What utter crap LT ~ just wooden spooning again ~ cos you enjoy.

The poll results :joker:

Ever the contrary Mary.

:clap1:

Oh for sure, I don’t believe the story but at a push it could be true, it’s more likely it was Easter holidays they had booked the time off anyway as school would be closed, it was a Friday night so they headed off :joker:

Obv really Cherie, all booked for mummy and wifes birthday ,but so what we'll just lie our arses off and 90% of government will back us up. Good times

But...you realised the dangers and turned around. Good old Dom was prepared to sacrifice his nieces for a laugh. Don't defend people that don't have your integrity.

As I have always stated I was defending what he did..cause If :wavey:I had a motor I'd be in it now heading north..

Ain't it funny how a thread goes quiet for a good 20 to 30 minutes, then all of a sudden it's a flurry of attacks on certain members...

Are you all bored or something...go have a walk fgs...or a wank if you cant be bothered...

I wasn't attacking you? I was saying you have more integrity than cummings.

I'm. not on about me or you...I'm on about the sustained attack on lt for having an opinion by other members...look at the usual group post timings of posts..ita obviously still being discussed by others before they flurry post together.

Blimey you're paranoid.

That’s what was advised...however there was an exemption if childcare was an issue. Going 260 miles to his mothers therefore was not a rule break, it’s not his fault they live so far away...and that was his only option for possible childcare.
The rule break was the drive out to the castle...

I don't know anything about that, but I will say there have been times when I've posted stuff that's caused a "debate" between you and I, or Liv and I, or LT and I, and then you all suddenly rush in together. Now, I don't believe you're all whatsapping for the right moment to come at me, but it does look that way, so maybe affording others the same chance of coincidence wouldn't be a bad thing?

The exception for young children was but in place to safeguard children in abusive and negligent households, it wasn’t meant to be abused by those in power do they could have a family holiday for some family birthdays, it was all against the rules

His wifes sister lived nearby, and they didn't have any emergency or childcare needs. His family didn't provide a childcare at all.

Tbf, that's something else he didn't properly explain as when questioned about the family he had living in London, even just a street away he responded he "hadn't considered it".

His trip to Durham had zilch to do with requiring immediate childcare for coronavirus reasons IMO. Did the child even make contact with the nieces or grandparents?

I don't know why I'm shocked, but I am, that the advisor to the bloody Prime Minister can't seem to get his simple story straight (whether it's truth or make believe) and just digs a deeper hole with every word he speaks. :joker:

:joker:

Parm says... having been posting all day long.

Stepping back and looking again I think you are correct...I've had it too so maybe I was judging on the way I felt at the time...even tonight I've had an incident via PM for the first time since toy soldier asked people to PM something about themselves..right out of the blue so I guess I am a bit paranoid jax...

I've stood back now though.. and put the kettle on.

You have no evidence to say that

Yeah Morgan where is your evidence to say driving with eyesight impairment is wrong?

Lol, that is somewhat paranoid. It's also not true

Me and lt never talk..hes a fifer, and to young.

It's the opposite of paranoid. It's saying that it's a coincidence if you all pop on together, and maybe that's the same for others too. You're really struggling to read what I'm writing recently - you need a 30 minute drive with a kid in the backseat :smug: