ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Has anyone taken advantage of the Government's Eat out to help out scheme? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=369276)

user104658 17-08-2020 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam- (Post 10897285)
The name of the scheme will never not be stupid, it’s ****ing ridiculous :joker:

Cardi B suggested it?

Smithy 17-08-2020 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 10897065)
Going McDonald’s tomorrow to make the most of it :pipe:

THE BASTARD WAS CLOSED

Opens on Wednesday though so gonna go then :hee:

Ammi 17-08-2020 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 10897521)
THE BASTARD WAS CLOSED

Opens on Wednesday though so gonna go then :hee:

...welcome to the U.K. ...:laugh:..

Ammi 19-08-2020 05:47 PM

Restaurants pull out of Eat Out to Help Out scheme over rude and ‘hostile’ customers...



Several restaurants have pulled out of the government’s Eat Out to Help Out scheme because of “unwelcome behaviour” from some diners.

The initiative, which was introduced at the start of August, sees restaurants take 50% off the bill, which is then claimed back from the government.

Some 85,000 restaurants signed up, but now several owners have spoken out about levels of “hostility” towards staff since the scheme started.

Kelly Hill, who runs the Tavern Inn in Newquay, told the BBC she had pulled out of the scheme because the demand has brought them “nothing but negativity”.

She said: "People are ordering big, big meals; they are not willing to wait for their food; our staff are being shouted at for having no tables, or for the service being slow. It's put an awful lot of strain on our waiting staff and kitchen staff.”

Waitress Claudia Casey, 22, described a recent experience during the campaign as the “worst night of my eight years in the hospitality industry.

...full article...
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/eat-out-he...070521346.html

MTVN 19-08-2020 07:10 PM

^ That's a shame but it must be a very tiny minority that have those problems, in general there seems to have been so much positivity about the scheme.

I went for lunch yesterday and would normally never even have thought to book on a Tuesday but I phoned up three places in advance and they were fully booked and eventually got in the forth place. I also went for a big breakfast today and the place had reservations on most the tables through the whole morning, was lucky to get in without booking

Cherie 19-08-2020 07:20 PM

Yes I think that’s an odd case..went for costa coffee and cake today..it was lovely, socially distanced ....and everyone was acting normally :laugh:

caprimint 19-08-2020 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 10897155)
No we’re in the middle of a pandemic. Eating out isn’t essential when you have food at home away from other people

:facepalm:

Kizzy 19-08-2020 08:27 PM

I can't understand why it's not drive through too, surely then you're isolating and supporting the economy?..

MTVN 19-08-2020 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 10898572)
I can't understand why it's not drive through too, surely then you're isolating and supporting the economy?..

They don't want people isolating anymore, it's about encouraging people to dine out and reassure them that it's safe

Dogeatdog 20-08-2020 02:22 PM

Only over the last couple days because when this scheme first started the queues for places was absolutely ridiculous it just wasn’t worth the wait.

user104658 20-08-2020 02:56 PM

Having worked a kitchen, I can see why it would be a problem. People probably aren't actually paying less when they're getting half price... they'll pay the same and order double. Kitchens only have so much capacity and it can "tip over the line" very easily in unusual circumstances and as soon as you get a backlog, meals start taking ages to get out to tables, things start going cold, and you have the knock-on of reduced table availability because it's taking so long to feed the people who are already there. I was a pub-chef while I was at Uni and one year the bar manager managed to forget that it was St Patricks day... in a Uni town... with a high Irish student population... and staffed for a normal Thursday... on one of the busiest nights of the year. It was horrendous. I still have flashbacks :worry:.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 10898572)
I can't understand why it's not drive through too, surely then you're isolating and supporting the economy?..

I think the issue is that it was designed to support businesses that haven't been doing OK, i.e. those without delivery/drive-thru capabilities. Fast food places - based on the queues - have been doing fine since they were allowed to reopen and would be doing fine even without the dine-in option.

To be honest I think if the govt. had had the option, fast food franchises wouldn't have been included in the scheme at all, but I imagine they couldn't legally exclude them because they are technically still "eat-in dining" if you go in. But yeah, the scheme really wasn't designed to help out McDonalds and KFC, who don't need it.

Kizzy 20-08-2020 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 10898584)
They don't want people isolating anymore, it's about encouraging people to dine out and reassure them that it's safe

Well not isolating but you have the option to eat in or out then if it's busy.
It's not actually 'safe' is it? They didn't have to introduce the half price thing imo as in a socially distanced place they would've got the capacity at full price. This as said encourages risks like queues and places ignoring social distancing guidelines.

It could be seen as a herd immunity tactic, in an enclosed space maskless, touching chairs and things. otherwise what is the point?

Kizzy 20-08-2020 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10898982)
Having worked a kitchen, I can see why it would be a problem. People probably aren't actually paying less when they're getting half price... they'll pay the same and order double. Kitchens only have so much capacity and it can "tip over the line" very easily in unusual circumstances and as soon as you get a backlog, meals start taking ages to get out to tables, things start going cold, and you have the knock-on of reduced table availability because it's taking so long to feed the people who are already there. I was a pub-chef while I was at Uni and one year the bar manager managed to forget that it was St Patricks day... in a Uni town... with a high Irish student population... and staffed for a normal Thursday... on one of the busiest nights of the year. It was horrendous. I still have flashbacks :worry:.



I think the issue is that it was designed to support businesses that haven't been doing OK, i.e. those without delivery/drive-thru capabilities. Fast food places - based on the queues - have been doing fine since they were allowed to reopen and would be doing fine even without the dine-in option.

To be honest I think if the govt. had had the option, fast food franchises wouldn't have been included in the scheme at all, but I imagine they couldn't legally exclude them because they are technically still "eat-in dining" if you go in. But yeah, the scheme really wasn't designed to help out McDonalds and KFC, who don't need it.

Yep some forethought on the subsidy would have been good and gear it towards those only without the option of drive through or take away. Or have 50% for those without and 25% for those with.

Crimson Dynamo 20-08-2020 03:08 PM

did maccies at weekend and sat in. was fine

bots 20-08-2020 03:09 PM

restaurants that were already busy shouldn't have signed up for the scheme, they were being greedy

Cherie 20-08-2020 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10898982)
Having worked a kitchen, I can see why it would be a problem. People probably aren't actually paying less when they're getting half price... they'll pay the same and order double. Kitchens only have so much capacity and it can "tip over the line" very easily in unusual circumstances and as soon as you get a backlog, meals start taking ages to get out to tables, things start going cold, and you have the knock-on of reduced table availability because it's taking so long to feed the people who are already there. I was a pub-chef while I was at Uni and one year the bar manager managed to forget that it was St Patricks day... in a Uni town... with a high Irish student population... and staffed for a normal Thursday... on one of the busiest nights of the year. It was horrendous. I still have flashbacks :worry:.



I think the issue is that it was designed to support businesses that haven't been doing OK, i.e. those without delivery/drive-thru capabilities. Fast food places - based on the queues - have been doing fine since they were allowed to reopen and would be doing fine even without the dine-in option.

To be honest I think if the govt. had had the option, fast food franchises wouldn't have been included in the scheme at all, but I imagine they couldn't legally exclude them because they are technically still "eat-in dining" if you go in. But yeah, the scheme really wasn't designed to help out McDonalds and KFC, who don't need it.

No one I know that availed of it ordered double, they were happy to get the a meal at 50% off :shrug: the scheme seems to have worked well from what I can gather

MTVN 20-08-2020 05:13 PM

Yeah I mean surely not that many people are so gluttonous that they'll massively overeat by ordering themselves two meals just because they can.

The only way I'd think people are ordering more is they might now have a starter or desert as well as they're main

caprimint 20-08-2020 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 10899052)
Yeah I mean surely not that many people are so gluttonous that they'll massively overeat by ordering themselves two meals just because they can.

The only way I'd think people are ordering more is they might now have a starter or desert as well as they're main

*their

You've had one too many Matthew

MTVN 20-08-2020 05:20 PM

I never mix up my theirs :omgno:

Time to delete this whole thread

caprimint 20-08-2020 05:21 PM

:joker:

Ammi 21-08-2020 06:27 AM

...there is always so much conflicting contrast in media articles as well...another media source was reporting a similar article, which I read yesterday or the day before, I can’t recall which

‘Overworked and abused': Some hospitality staff can't wait for Eat Out to Help Out to end...


https://uk.yahoo.com/news/eat-out-he...075209676.html

...but I’ve also read an article in the last few days...(...apologies I don’t have a link for that one...)...which was calls from restaurants for the scheme to be given another month in September because it’s helping so much...

Ammi 21-08-2020 06:28 AM

...in before their conflicting stories are deleted with their thread...


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.