![]() |
Quote:
|
Not misogynistic at all
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
...it could have been ‘father in law’ just easily, but it wasn’t...because there hasn’t really been father in law ‘humour’ in the same way...as in, inferring father in laws are bit monstrous and stereotyping them in such a negative way...it’s not providing any ‘equal, why ‘in law humour at all’...and it’s definitely not progressing in any way by using a ‘humour’ that has become out dated for a reason...
|
they should have used "Chugger" instead as that would put the fear of God in most
|
Nah, sorry, ‘everyone hates/is scared of their mother-in-law’ is not demeaning an entire gender
|
...I mean, one of the very things that ‘father in law humour’ hasn’t been a thing is what should have told them that this was an awful regression...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
to say everyone hates them is just ridiculous |
Quote:
And not all mothers are monstrous in-laws. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I can see how some mother-in-law humour can be seen as sexist.
But this is literally "avoid people like you might avoid your mother-in-law". The number of people who actually do that is quite high. :hehe: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
If all mother-in-laws are women and some women are monstrous, which of these statements are true? A - All Mother-in-Laws are monstrous B - Some Mother-in-Laws are monstrous C - No Monsters are mothers |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.