ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   NHS worker punched & thrown from Tube train/confronted passengers for no masks... (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=371220)

bots 28-10-2020 01:59 PM

Proper protection requires the mask to be moulded and shaped to your face, otherwise it wont be a perfect seal. Medical masks will probable be better than your average mask, but the intention of public mask wearing was always to protect others arounf you rather than yourself

Crimson Dynamo 28-10-2020 02:01 PM

its to stop water droplets from coughing and speaking

user104658 28-10-2020 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicky91 (Post 10941680)
:umm2: no, i see that on the boxes of the masks we got, protection up to 96%



still wearing a mask protects you more than no mask (i know you still need to be careful of course, but with a mask you are more protected for example in stores within crowded areas of that)

"up to" 96%, with 96% being when both you and the people you are in contact with are wearing the masks.

Yes obviously wearing a mask is better protection for yourself than not wearing one - but most of the protection is from the infected person wearing one.

The only way you'd get 90%+ protection for yourself would be wearing full PPE (medical mask, goggles, full body suit and gloves).

A lot of the rhetoric about masks being magical near-full protection is coming from the US and is a lie. If masks worked that well there would be no need for any distancing or lockdown.

Tom4784 28-10-2020 03:05 PM

Anti-maskers are scum.

Zizu 28-10-2020 03:20 PM

NHS worker punched & thrown from Tube train/confronted passengers for no masks...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicky91 (Post 10941668)
no it also protects yourself



some masks protect up to 94% and some others up to 96 or 97%



Not the wearer though as we understand anyways..unless you’re wearing the top range surgical masks

Also those figures look ridiculously optimistic given that there you can fit 1/4 million (250,000) Covid19 particles on a PIN head !!!

One microbiologist recently compared us wearing the normal cheap masks to closing the farm gates to keep an ant from walking through ...

( it won’t)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Nicky91 28-10-2020 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10941693)
"up to" 96%, with 96% being when both you and the people you are in contact with are wearing the masks.

Yes obviously wearing a mask is better protection for yourself than not wearing one - but most of the protection is from the infected person wearing one.

The only way you'd get 90%+ protection for yourself would be wearing full PPE (medical mask, goggles, full body suit and gloves).

A lot of the rhetoric about masks being magical near-full protection is coming from the US and is a lie. If masks worked that well there would be no need for any distancing or lockdown.

you need masks, as well as social distancing and a lockdown, neither can work effectively without the other

yes you are correct about that, but these measures all help of course, so those nutjobs of anti-maskers need to keep their mouths shut, stay home and don't protest anymore what only wastes our time

Dogeatdog 28-10-2020 04:10 PM

Hope he gets some justice. The people that attacked him could’ve easily just explained why they were exempt (which I don’t think they were but is possible) from wearing a mask, there’s no justification for getting violent.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.