The defence chap is pretty calm and reasoned, good opening so far

Its Live again
But No news channels are carrying it
except the Pop up Sky channel

This Link has it LIVE
Derek Chauvin trial

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJvcJ1KFLfo

Now CNN HD are showing it
Also SkyNewsHD

I have been watching....it’s an interesting watch.


I think all the Lawyers involved have been very good.

George Floyd is not on trial, so I don’t know why that is their headline?

Overdose?

Likely to have swallowed his drugs when he saw the Police turn up?

It's all gone a bit quiet, it does seem like the original narrative we were sold doesn't have much confidence left in itself.

The Expert yesterday was amazing...so far there is no substantial evidence to prove the drugs had any effect. However we are only seeing prosecution witnesses so it’s all very incriminating against the defendant...

Backfire: A VERY Bad Day For Prosecutors In Chauvin Trial
 

Sure
But that Cop's
knee on his kneck, killed him.

that has not yet been established in the court

unbelievable

The expert for the prosecution said even if he hadnt had pressure on his neck..the pressure on his back sandwiching him against the road was enough to put the pressure on his lungs and stop him breathing..along with his hands behind his back.
What seems to have caused confusion is that GF was saying he couldnt breathe when he was in the back of the Squad car...
I think Defense witnesses are in court next week.

Live, again


CNN HD, SkyNews Online YouTube
and their Pop Up Channel 524 (SkyOnly)



Witness is a Heart Specialist Doctor.

At this time, also Live on SkyNewsHD

Will Derek Chauvin Be Convicted? — NYC Trial Attorney Provides Her Analysis
 

i'm sure court will say he is not guilty as they always protect their own

Its back on TV.

CNN HD

to get a guilty verdict on any of the charges requires unanimous agreement of the jury. If the defence have done their work properly, they will have ensured that someone made it on to the jury that won't find him guilty

Derek Chauvin trial judge says 'abhorrent' comments by US congresswoman
Maxine Waters could jeopardise verdict

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/...eg?imwidth=960

A California congresswoman's comments about Derek Chauvin's murder trial
could have given the former officer grounds for an appeal, the judge in the
case said.

Judge Peter Cahill called Maxine Waters's comments "abhorrent" as he
exhorted elected officials to stop disrespecting "the rule of law".

Ms Waters joined protesters in the area over the weekend and suggested
they should "get more confrontational" if Mr Chauvin was acquitted.

The 45-year-old faces manslaughter and murder charges after pinning
George Floyd to the ground for more than nine minutes in a fatal arrest last
May.

As the jury began their deliberations on Monday afternoon, the defence mad
a last-minute request for a mistrial based on "intimidating" comments from
Ms Waters.


Defence lawyer Eric Nelson also argued the huge amount of news coverage
over the case meant it would have been impossible for jurors to avoid
consuming some of the press around the trial.


Judge Cahill rejected the motion for a mistrial, but told the defence:
"Congresswoman Waters may have given you something on appeal that may
result in this whole trial being overturned".

Visibly irritated, he said: "I wish elected officials would stop talking about this
case, especially in a manner that is disrespectful to the rule of law... their
failure to do so is abhorrent."

But he added: "I don't think it has prejudiced us with additional material that
would prejudice this jury. They have been told not to watch the news. I trust
they are following those instructions."

Ms Waters, a Democrat, had joined protesters on Saturday outside
the Brooklyn Center Police headquarters, just 10 miles from where Mr Chauvin's trial is taking place.

Ms Waters told the crowd she wanted to see a murder conviction against Mr Chauvin.


When asked what should happen if the ex-officer is not convicted on
murder charges, she replied: "We gotta stay on the street, we've got to get
more active, we've got to get more confrontational, we've got to make sure
that they know that we mean business."



https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...congresswoman/

that woman is a complete nutter, it was her and her cronies that stopped Biden winning by a massive landslide

This is why Limited terms in government is a must, otherwise they spend their whole life there, and turn out like Gropey Joe and Mad Maxine

Jury Has Reached a Verdict.

Soon announced

eek, it could be mayhem there shortly then although the quick verdict probably means he is guilty of at least 1 charge

Whatever the verdict there is going to be trouble I would imagine

He has to be declared guilty, he was literally caught on camera in a 9 minute long video... If he isn't guilty on all counts than there is no justice.