ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Whodunit: The Royal Family Edition (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=374073)

Cherie 09-03-2021 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denver (Post 11014101)
I'm thinking William as Harry said it would publicly ruin the person and Charkes is universally hated already while the future King William is being presented as Squeaky clean

yesterday you were convinced it was Charles, see what Harry has done there?

if if were William given how well the two of them got on before the Wedding it might have been part of a jokey conversation that Harry then relayed to Megs who then pointed out he should have been outraged, and he duly complied :skull:

I hope whoever it was comes forward if they can even remember the conversation that is

UserSince2005 09-03-2021 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11014106)
yesterday you were convinced it was Charles, see what Harry has done there?

if if were William given how well the two of them got on before the Wedding it might have been part of a jokey conversation that Harry then relayed to Megs who then pointed out he should have been outraged, and he duly complied :skull:

I hope whoever it was comes forward if they can even remember the conversation that is

This would make sense.

UserSince2005 09-03-2021 10:42 AM

Brotherly bants?

Cherie 09-03-2021 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UserSince2005 (Post 11014109)
Brotherly bants?

Maybe he would like Wills to abdicate so he could one day make Megs Queen :laugh:

AnnieK 09-03-2021 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11014110)
Maybe he would like Wills to abdicate so he could one day make Megs Queen :laugh:

He'd have to hope that George, Charlotte and Louis abdicate as well. He's well down the pecking order now.

Cherie 09-03-2021 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 11014115)
He'd have to hope that George, Charlotte and Louis abdicate as well. He's well down the pecking order now.

Oh is that how it works, I thought he would be next!

joeysteele 09-03-2021 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 11014115)
He'd have to hope that George, Charlotte and Louis abdicate as well. He's well down the pecking order now.

Exactly Annie.
Plus of course there's Prince Charles above Prince William too.
IF Charles becomes King and lives as long as the Queen, with all the rest in line after him too.

I think it a tall order if not impossible for Prince Harry to ever be near the throne.

AnnieK 09-03-2021 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11014117)
Oh is that how it works, I thought he would be next!

He was until William had children, with each subsequent child, Harry moved down a peg so barring an absolute tragedy....his chances are pretty slim.

joeysteele 09-03-2021 11:06 AM

This poll has a massive inaccuracy on it.
It states SHE is making it up for attention.

SHE never heard it, it was the HE who heard it.
It was ONLY said to Prince Harry as he confirmed in the interview.

So it's staggering anyone can now accuse HER of making it up.

jet 09-03-2021 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 11013997)

Well, he has form....:oh:

Crimson Dynamo 09-03-2021 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 11014124)
This poll has a massive inaccuracy on it.
It states SHE is making it up for attention.

SHE never heard it, it was the HE who heard it.
It was ONLY said to Prince Harry as he confirmed in the interview.

So it's staggering anyone can now accuse HER of making it up.

Harry said that the comment was made once to him

SHE said "Meghan said she would answer 'honestly', before going on to claim there were 'concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he's born'"

so she even made up that it was said more than once


The lies trip off her tongue so easily she even made up conversations in the actual interview :shocked:

LukeB 09-03-2021 11:21 AM

Camilla
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OkGdzJrssAU/maxresdefault.jpg

Zizu 09-03-2021 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UserSince2005 (Post 11013983)
Who supposedly raised their "concerns" over how dark the skin of Meghan and Harry's the baby will be?



Harry has ruled out Prince Philip and the Queen.



My money is on that shameless hussy who help ruin Di’s marriage and life ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Zizu 09-03-2021 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11013991)
I am going for Camilla





We need context for how it was said though, and Harry is a turd for just throwing it out there and then saying he will never say who it was, then later back tracking and exonorating the Queen and Philip, because of how bad it would look on him, he knows Charles and Cam aren't popular



Great minds


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Zizu 09-03-2021 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11014135)
Harry said that the comment was made once to him



SHE said "Meghan said she would answer 'honestly', before going on to claim there were 'concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he's born'"



so she even made up that it was said more than once





The lies trip off her tongue so easily she even made up conversations in the actual interview :shocked:



Well nobody knows for sure how often it was discussed or mentioned..

It’s rather unlikely that once that particular bombshell had been dropped that everyone just carried on regardless and never mentioned it afterwards..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

rusticgal 09-03-2021 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11013991)
I am going for Camilla


We need context for how it was said though, and Harry is a turd for just throwing it out there and then saying he will never say who it was, then later back tracking and exonorating the Queen and Philip, because of how bad it would look on him, he knows Charles and Cam aren't popular


I completely agree....The fact that they have exonerated The Queen and Prince Phillip and left speculation over the others was a deliberate retaliation against those they have fallen out with...

Niamh. 09-03-2021 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11014144)
I completely agree....The fact that they have exonerated The Queen and Prince Phillip and left speculation over the others was a deliberate retaliation against those they have fallen out with...

For good reason it seems like

rusticgal 09-03-2021 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 11014035)
I'm disgusted to see people dilute racism. No context dismisses the fact a person was concerned about a child's skin colour. If the child is healthy who gives a **** what colour their skin is.

Literally seeing so many people in a different light.



No one is diluting Racism...if it was said in a racist way then thats clearly not acceptable. However 'concern' and 'curiosity' are two different things...and this is one persons one sided view of the conversation that could easily be taken out of context.

rusticgal 09-03-2021 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11014145)
For good reason it seems like



I dont see it as a good reason at all....in fact its vindictive. If you are going to make a serious accusation regarding racism say who it is that actually said it and let them answer to it.

rusticgal 09-03-2021 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11014081)
You should have made the poll public, I want to know who is with me on Camilla


Me....I can imagine her saying it very tongue in cheek as she draws on her cigarette :laugh:

Amy Jade 09-03-2021 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11014150)
No one is diluting Racism...if it was said in a racist way then thats clearly not acceptable. However 'concern' and 'curiosity' are two different things...and this is one persons one sided view of the conversation that could easily be taken out of context.

Yes you are. Harry stated the concern was for the child's skin colour and how it may effect the royal institution.

You'll say anything to try and interpret it differently and that is diluting racism. I've got no time for you.

rusticgal 09-03-2021 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11014100)
nothing more than an unfounded allegation by people who cant even get their story straight in the actual interview

she said it was said several times

he said no, only once

:facepalm:


Amongst many other inconsistences....

joeysteele 09-03-2021 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11014145)
For good reason it seems like


For very good reason indeed, in my view.

rusticgal 09-03-2021 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11014105)
Dont forget this is the Harry who thought that The Nazis were funny and called someone a "little p*k*" (a man from Pakistan)

SO lets just agree he isnt the most reliable person to judge on racism

:skull:


I know...the hypocrisy is unreal.

Zizu 09-03-2021 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11014081)
You should have made the poll public, I want to know who is with me on Camilla



Yep


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.