ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   2 more LIES emerge and Markle sister drags Meghan on Mental Health claim! (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=374083)

Niamh. 09-03-2021 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11014331)
Another, er, inconsistency - Reverend David Green "Its not legal to have your own vows, you can't get married twice.

Meghan "Three days before our wedding, we got married. No - one knows that."

BBC - A spokesperson for the Sussexes' said it was a private exchange of vows
that had been 'incorrectly described' by Meghan
.

So they did have a private exchange of vows like she said, it wasn't actually a lie? It's just nit picking at how she worded it? fgs

jet 09-03-2021 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11014336)
So they did have a private exchange of vows like she said, it wasn't actually a lie? It's just nit picking at how she worded it? fgs

She said 'we got married 3 days before' though, not 'we exchanged private vows' which is a totally different thing as that isn't getting married.
Which made people think her big wedding 3 days later presided over by the Archbishop of Canterbury was a sham.

Niamh. 09-03-2021 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11014340)
She said 'we got married 3 days before' though, not 'we exchanged private vows' which is a totally different thing as that isn't getting married.
Which made people think her big wedding 3 days later presided over by the Archbishop of Canterbury was a sham.

Why would it be a sham? I've been to plenty of weddings where the couple had gotten married a few days earlier in a registry office just for the legal stuff and then had their own ceremonies with all the guests to attend, I never felt I was attending a "sham"

Anyway, what she said actually did happen, she did exchange vows with her husband a few days previous so they could have something personal and private which seems like the point she was making, that actually happened. It's nit picking to say she's lying

jet 09-03-2021 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11014343)
Why would it be a sham? I've been to plenty of weddings where the couple had gotten married a few days earlier in a registry office just for the legal stuff and then had their own ceremonies with all the guests to attend, I never felt I was attending a "sham"

Anyway, what she said actually did happen, she did exchange vows with her husband a few days previous so they could have something personal and private which seems like the point she was making, that actually happened. It's nit picking to say she's lying

There are many inconsistencies in what she and Harry said actually. If you are doing a 'tell all' interview and want people to believe your words, its imperative that you get all your facts straight and not 'incorrectly describe' events.

Zizu 09-03-2021 04:31 PM

The palace have just released a statement ... just damage limitation from what I heard ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

rusticgal 09-03-2021 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zizu (Post 11014357)
The palace have just released a statement ... just damage limitation from what I heard ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


I thought it was a fair and respectful response.

Crimson Dynamo 09-03-2021 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11014343)
Why would it be a sham? I've been to plenty of weddings where the couple had gotten married a few days earlier in a registry office just for the legal stuff and then had their own ceremonies with all the guests to attend, I never felt I was attending a "sham"

Anyway, what she said actually did happen, she did exchange vows with her husband a few days previous so they could have something personal and private which seems like the point she was making, that actually happened. It's nit picking to say she's lying

you cant legally get married in the UK without 2 witnesses

Zizu 09-03-2021 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11014364)
I thought it was a fair and respectful response.



That’s what I said ... damage limitation


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Jake. 09-03-2021 05:02 PM

So, no actual proof of lies then. Just sounds besotted with bitterness.

Jake. 09-03-2021 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 11014336)
So they did have a private exchange of vows like she said, it wasn't actually a lie? It's just nit picking at how she worded it? fgs

The grasping at straws is honestly ridiculous :joker:

bots 09-03-2021 05:06 PM

Meghan and Harry knowingly put the queen in an impossible position. Claim there was racism but not specifically identify the culprit. It means the queen cannot refute it, so the only option given that is that it is and should have remained a private family matter, it was the only line she could take.

They may say they are still much loved, but that certainly wont be true of all the family, they have burnt a lot of bridges that wont be repaired

rusticgal 09-03-2021 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zizu (Post 11014385)
That’s what I said ... damage limitation


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Yeah you did sorry :laugh:

rusticgal 09-03-2021 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 11014399)
Meghan and Harry knowingly put the queen in an impossible position. Claim there was racism but not specifically identify the culprit. It means the queen cannot refute it, so the only option given that is that it is and should have remained a private family matter, it was the only line she could take.

They may say they are still much loved, but that certainly wont be true of all the family, they have burnt a lot of bridges that wont be repaired



Sadly so true...

Beso 09-03-2021 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 11014262)
No evidence for this at all, just a bitter jealous siblings word

Bit like harry last night

rusticgal 09-03-2021 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11014331)
Another, er, inconsistency - Reverend David Green "Its not legal to have your own vows, you can't get married twice.

Meghan "Three days before our wedding, we got married. No - one knows that."

BBC - A spokesperson for the Sussexes' said it was a private exchange of vows
that had been 'incorrectly described' by Meghan.




Perhaps Meghan thought it was a wedding...but no one had told her otherwise :shrug:

jet 09-03-2021 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 11014411)
Bit like harry last night

Yep! :clap1:

Crimson Dynamo 09-03-2021 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 11014411)
Bit like harry last night

Yes

"someone said something 4 years ago that may be very mildly racist perhaps if said in the wrong way but i cant say who and i cant actually reemeber much about it


:facepalm:

GoldHeart 09-03-2021 05:46 PM

:umm2::crazy: Samantha & Thomas once again show how horrible they truly are.

Why can't they leave Meghan alone, this is appalling how they continue to make digs .

jet 09-03-2021 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11014413)
Perhaps Meghan thought it was a wedding...but no one had told her otherwise :shrug:

:hehe:

Beso 09-03-2021 06:01 PM

Heres another one .she said she knew nothing of harry before she met him, yet she was mates with eugene before she met him.

She also thought the royal family was what you saw in fairytales, even though she has been friends with eugene for a long time.

Shes a bit thick if you ask me...she didnt even know how to bend a knee for the queen...yet thought they only did that on official engagements so had obviously seen it.

And this is only 4minutes in

Cherie 09-03-2021 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 11014411)
Bit like harry last night

Oh ...:laugh:

Crimson Dynamo 09-03-2021 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 11014474)
Heres another one .she said she knew nothing of harry before she met him, yet she was mates with eugene before she met him.

She also thought the royal family was what you saw in fairytales, even though she has been friends with eugene for a long time.

Shes a bit thick if you ask me...she didnt even know how to bend a knee for the queen...yet thought they only did that on official engagements so had obviously seen it.

And this is only 4minutes in

I think she has lied so much in her life its now involuntary and she has no idea she is doing it

Smithy 09-03-2021 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 11014411)
Bit like harry last night

What exactly has he lied about?

rusticgal 09-03-2021 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 11014474)
Heres another one .she said she knew nothing of harry before she met him, yet she was mates with eugene before she met him.

She also thought the royal family was what you saw in fairytales, even though she has been friends with eugene for a long time.

Shes a bit thick if you ask me...she didnt even know how to bend a knee for the queen...yet thought they only did that on official engagements so had obviously seen it.

And this is only 4minutes in



So many inconsistances...I wouldn’t want her as a witness in court.

jet 09-03-2021 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11014498)
I think she has lied so much in her life its now involuntary and she has no idea she is doing it

We can tell though - her lips move. :hehe:


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.