Exactly TS,

https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-p...%3A839%2Csmart

He walked from a sinking ship and now he has the world at his feet

Poor sacked old man.

Piers embarrassed himself by storming off in a huff more like :hee: .

With his 20 million fortune. God help him. :bawling:

Honestly, I would’ve had no idea she used to be an addict had she not brought attention to it by doing this.

Streisand Effect.

I agree again, Piers' world is certainly at his feet. Someone pass him the superglue :worry:

Well colour me shocked that you put emphasis on money.

He could have billions and it wouldn't change the embarrassment he is to the public.

Only most of the public agreed with him, they don't like her either. :laugh:
Piers putting his finger up to the tiresome virtue signallers and their gullible and wokey emotions when they go all fragile at Meghan speaking her ‘truth’. How dare he be allowed free speech like our Megsie, cancel him! :fan:

I didn't ask for more diatribe and a repeat of your complete misunderstanding of what free speech actually is and what it entails.

Educate yourself then come back.

But 2 New Channels
in News, can hire him.

I don't understand how people can flat out ignore things that there is actual documented video evidence of. You know Piers liked Meghan (quite a lot), there's multiple videos of his saying how much he liked her. You know he was hurt/upset by her "cutting him off" and not speaking to him any more - there are multiple videos of him admitting that... And then you know he, following that, had a disproportionately passionate dislike of her verging on obsession. But some people won't concede that these things are obviously linked?

H... How does one lie to themself like that?

...is it that Meghan ‘cut him off’ as such, their worlds probably didn’t collide ...all of the stuff that I’ve read have said that he felt that he was ‘owed’ an invite to the wedding and didn’t get one...some kind of sense of entitlement for whatever reason in his head...

I mean she might have, but the idea is that she "met a better prospect" (than this older married man :umm2: ) and so gave him the cold shoulder even as a friend, when surely the sudden distance could just as easily be explained by her getting together with Harry, and Harry privately being clear about his dislike of the UK press from the outset. Piers Morgan has practically been the avatar of British Pressness for many years.

...yeah, it has to be said that Piers represents so much that Harry is completely repulsed by in terms of media, I hadn’t actually thought of it like that before...for Piers to see it like that, though and not ‘oh she’s just ghosted me, horrid woman...’...etc...he would actually have to hold a mirror to himself, wouldn’t he...bullying and controlling seems more in line with his personality...

good for her

I know what your definition of free speech means :wink:

Freedom of Speech certainly isn't a shield against criticism like you constantly think it is.

There is a world of difference between valid and rational criticism (patently obvious racism and homophobia for example) and overwrought, wokey, virture signalling, 'cancel 'em!) criticism which is running rampant these days.

It's the actual definition. Like I said, educate and then come back. These posts where you pretend to know something "but not sharing :fan:" are embarrassing.

And anybody with an iota of common sense knows that "patently obvious racism and homophobia" is not the only form of racism and homophobia. But, you know that.

I do...and then there is the kind of fake criticism I'm referring to......where the far leftie wokies have to look for something innocent enough they can put an 'ism' or 'phobia' etc onto the end of to be offended by on a daily basis or they'd lose the will to live.

But it's bye bye to you once again! :wavey:

I thought it might be. Can't handle anything that doesn't parrot your slogans.