ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Do we really want Queen Camilla? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=375359)

Zizu 07-05-2021 09:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet (Post 11043288)
I was a big fan of Diana’s, but having affairs with married men who were hurting their wives when she knew how that felt isn’t something a pure spirit would do, more of a flawed spirit really.

But her genuine warmth and compassion made it easy for most of us to overlook her faults and failings which in many ways were due to the lack of true love in her marriage, imo.

Btw, Diana’s affair with the single James Hewitt started in 1986 and ended around 1991, she didn’t split from Charles until 1992, but of course Charles was having his affair with Camilla before and after these dates.


... before and after Charlie Boy married Dinas well ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

jet 07-05-2021 10:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zizu (Post 11043293)
... before and after Charlie Boy married Dinas well ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Whether Charles continued his affair with Camilla after their marriage is disputed. It is widely accepted (the Andrew Morton book which was aided by Diana) that their affair stopped on marrying Diana and didn't resume until several years later when, as Charles said "the marriage had irretrievably broken down".
However, throughout all this time, Camilla remained his confidante and they were in constant touch which was nearly as bad as far as Diana was concerned.

For those watching, this series of the Crown is really ramping it up for dramatic effect rather than the truth; the fact that the producer is an anti - monarchist tells its own story. :hee:

Marsh. 07-05-2021 10:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 11043093)
Thankfully, she will never be queen. I can't remember the correct term, but it will be something like kings consort
She would be Queen Consort.

Marsh. 07-05-2021 10:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mokka (Post 11043202)
verb
/kənˈsôrt,ˈkänˌsôrt/
habitually associate with (someone), typically with the disapproval of others

Yeah... that sounds like the right descriptive term for her
:joker:

Alf 07-05-2021 10:42 AM
They're all at it like rabbits, on our taxes! The dirty devils.

jet 07-05-2021 11:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alf (Post 11043325)
They're all at it like rabbits, on our taxes! The dirty devils.
Seems like being connected to BUCKingham Palace does that to one. :hehe:

Zizu 07-05-2021 11:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet (Post 11043318)
Whether Charles continued his affair with Camilla after their marriage is disputed. It is widely accepted (the Andrew Morton book which was aided by Diana) that their affair stopped on marrying Diana and didn't resume until several years later when, as Charles said "the marriage had irretrievably broken down".

However, throughout all this time, Camilla remained his confidante and they were in constant touch which was nearly as bad as far as Diana was concerned.



For those watching, this series of the Crown is really ramping it up for dramatic effect rather than the truth; the fact that the producer is an anti - monarchist tells its own story. :hee:


Harry said The Crown is fiction but ...

Says all you need to know


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

jet 07-05-2021 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zizu (Post 11043354)
Harry said The Crown is fiction but ...

Says all you need to know


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
What does it say? I'm not getting what you mean. :conf:

bots 07-05-2021 12:01 PM
the crown can dramatise inter relationships, but it can't change factual history. I think if we understand that, it puts it in context

rusticgal 07-05-2021 12:02 PM
I dont have a problem with it at all. I adored Diana and I despised Charles for treating her the way he did...and like most I didnt think highly of Camilla as the 'Other woman'.
However...its quite clear how suited they are as a couple. They wanted to be together long before Diana came on the scene. Camilla has dealt with the situation as the vilified Mistress in a very dignified way over the years..she has kept herself to herself and I believe she has made Charles a better person.

Livia 07-05-2021 12:17 PM
Diana was a wonderfully caring woman, but deeply flawed. Charles should never have married someone so young, but we've all been advised against stuff we've gone on to do. I have no problem with Camilla at all, I think she's down to earth and quite unassuming. No one on this thread, nor anywhere else, knows fully what went on; it's all just gossip and speculation. Half of marriages fail, I see no reason why the Royals should be different.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:16 AM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.