I'm dismissive of her not clearing a man who wasn't responsible.

I know there's a feeling between some people on here that I am not sympathetic to rape victims. That is of course, not true. This rumour came about because I suggested that women should take responsibility for their own safety because rape is a real threat and the legal system is not fit for purpose when it comes to sex crimes. This caused some people to suggest that I was blaming the victim for being raped. This is not true. If it ever gets to the point where men don't think they have some kind of right to a woman's body, then we can all stroll home topless if we like.

Please don't follow me around today calling me names and suggesting I'm a monster.

I wouldn't say it's a rumor, it's just acknowledging what's seen written on the forum.

Our last conversation was instigated by you solely to call me names, so please don't try and set up a false situation where you can claim to being followed around.

It's only a couple of people that perpetuate the myth and you're one of them.

Our last conversation was instigated by the fact that you, once again, tried to stop me from commenting because of who I am and I reacted to that. That's why you wrote it.

I don't want to have to go through this with you every time I come on here so please, won't you leave me alone?

Again Liv, please don't lie. That's all I said, and you followed it up with another lie.

Do you have anything to say about the actual topic? If you want to talk about me make a thread.

Maybe she also thinks Matthew is to blame? But Ulrika also is to blame for letting an innocent man go down.

Just because she holds her to account for not clearing an innocent man being falsely accused, which would take 5 seconds of her time with the cost being his whole career does not mean she thinks Matthew Wright is innocent, but she played a part also by being so selfish/lulling up the attention over the cost of a mans life/career

And by the same token, we have no idea what Ulrikas lawyers were telling her to do - they could have been telling her to keep quiet, and it's not a stretch to expect someone working within the legal sector to actually take that into consideration when discussing issues with potential legal ramifications.

Someone with actual legal knowledge could offer loads of interesting insights into these discussions.

And Liv, I apologise for discussing you here, but I'm just replying to a post your friend made about you in reply to me.

:hehe:

My specialism is international law. In any case, I can't imagine many solicitors would encourage anyone not to clear an innocent man. You don't have to have a legal background to know the moral thing to do.