What is the point in this? Really?

I've ripped into this show before on here. I dont know why anyone would watch the full version never mind this monstrosity.

The show they're using to spread this 'message' is one of the worst on TV. We're really trying too hard in certain areas and not using the best resources to educate young people

well said Girth

Most of them ‘kids’ have likely watched porn also. Let’s not pretend kids are sensitive to this sort of thing.

It’s only gone and happened
Me and Glenn agreeing on something

Presenter on GMBHD itv Kate Garraway
is not comfortable,
with Teens in front
of Adult Naked Bodies at 8PM on Ch4HD.

Of Course
Anna's age is given
as it is public.


She is a Journalist.


Her photo with that wig
makes her look younger.
So it is good to give her Real Age

On the one hand, promoting body acceptance* is fine. Everyone should be comfortable in their own skin.
*I say acceptance, not positivity. There's nothing positive about looking like you can't climb a flight of stairs without hyperventilating.

On the other, we don't need overweight people to remove their clothes to know they have rolls.

And they've almost certainly seen a fictional character die in a film or tv show, but that doesn't justify making them attend a live execution.

(They literally are kids, and wrapping airquotes around that word is a little troubling)

What is going on with all these weird naked shows? Before I opened this thread I saw two adds on TV for other shows where the contestants are Naked and Naked attraction wasn't even one of them. So grim. And this one is seriously odd

Another 5 shows to go.


They are teens
all Nude people were checked.

Kids with internet access can and do watch violent sex, straight sex , gay sex, basically any form of sex .

Like me and Glenn have both said, I know don’t fall over !

Those involved are mature young adults

Adults will watch this show more than children and hopefully they will learn to accept people for who they are.

Yes, they may well have seen performed depictions of sexual encounters, created in controlled environments. And if they've seen Star Wars, they'd have watched multiple shootings and forced amputations.

I don't get the obsession with nudity either, and why is there this attitude of "oh well kids have already seen worse" , isn't that alarming?? even if it's true ?. Plus it doesn't make it ok .

When I was that age in sex education ,we never had live adult models rocking up to classrooms and stripping naked. I understand teaching them about different body types,but this just looks weird.

Also this isn't the first time Anna Richardson had done a 'sex education ' for teens. I remember a while back she was showing teens how STDs are tested and that was pretty graphic . Some of the kids looked traumatised and embarrassed.

Millions of people have sex and issues with there bodies and people accepting their choices than the few people That are killing each other .

Since when was 14 considered adulthood?

The fact that they can (and will have) seen it online isn't the point at all. For one - the issue isn't even kids WATCHING the show, watching something on a screen that features nudity is very different to a child being in the physical presence of a naked adult.

The aim here seems to be to normalise (stranger, non-familial) adult nudity in front of children. It's literally a classic part of grooming tactics. There's also no need at all for it - it's been done to be deliberately provovative. No need at all for any of the people in that room to be under 16, preferably not under 18.

13 and 14 year old kids?

"But it's OK because they look at porn on their phone anyway" so Mr Smith from down the street might as well get his cock out for them I suppose. :facepalm:

To clarify Sheriff as it seems like you might have misunderstood what my issue was with this show;

It's not that they're encouraging teenagers to watch the show - it's that there is a section of the show where there are young teenagers physically in the room while the adults get naked and they're invited (or prompted) to comment on/ask questions about them.

Again that's very different to seeing nudity on-screen at home.

I see what you are saying but their parents will have given their permission

Teenagers know more today than we ever knew when we where growing up.

The police can arrest a ten year old or ask them to attend an interview with a responsible adult

So basically a ten year old is viewed as being old enough to know right from wrong and be responsible for their actions

That still doesn't make them an adult though, they cant vote, get married, drink, get a mortgage, they are children..


If they wanted children to be accepting of bodies they could have looked at other children as that would have been a bit more relatable though still doesnt make any sense .... to me any way

:clap1: :clap1:

"Old enough" is a dangerous mindset , as it will just continue to give perverts a green light to expose kids to all-sorts.

And I agree with soldier that teens watching it on TV is different to being present in the room with naked adults .

Mr smith getting his cock out would be without permission from parties involved. These teenagers are on the show with permission and consent.

And there it is.

The idea that a 14 year old can consent. That's the slippery slope that makes this a massive safeguarding problem -- the idea that the only difference between a flasher assaulting a teenager and a perfectly legitimate encounter is consent.

In other words ... do you think it would be OK for Mr Smith to get his cock out for a group of teenage girls if he asked them if they want to see it first and they said "Sure lol" ...?