Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper (Post 11314473)

We have a royal who paid off a girl he never met, to the tune of £12m of mommies money, and yet it's a constant spewing of H&M, H&M, H&M. That's not an accident.

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11314521)

No it isn’t, and it's obvious why. Andrew hides away and keeps his gob shut so there is nothing ongoing to say. H&M had Megxit, and an Oprah interview, and mag interviews, and a Big Apple visit with bells and whistles, and more mag interviews, and a Netflix series, and a Spotify bore fest, and a tell - all book which entailed another round of interviews, and a 'near - catastrophic' NY car chase which hilariously wasn't and had New Yorkers rolling their eyes. I’ve left out many attention seeking stunts, too numerous to recall them all. People who constantly seek publicity, especially controversial publicity want to be talked about. Simple really.

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11314521)

No it isn’t, and it's obvious why. Andrew hides away and keeps his gob shut so there is nothing ongoing to say. H&M had Megxit, and an Oprah interview, and mag interviews, and a Big Apple visit with bells and whistles, and more mag interviews, and a Netflix series, and a Spotify bore fest, and a tell - all book which entailed another round of interviews, and a 'near - catastrophic' NY car chase which hilariously wasn't and had New Yorkers rolling their eyes. I’ve left out many attention seeking stunts, too numerous to recall them all. People who constantly seek publicity, especially controversial publicity want to be talked about. Simple really.

Originally Posted by Swan (Post 11314515)

And this your problemo dawg. You need to be smarky on a ratio about 1/2 posts. You think you look cool, you don't. Just say what you feel without smarmy bollocks you add to every other post. I know you think it's cool, but you're the only one who think it is.

If you like H/M fine, just say it.

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper (Post 11314656)

Another southern belle loses their sh1t because I posted something

https://media.tenor.com/Avxsk6MXOT0AAAAC/funny-girl.gif

There is zero snark in that post, but let me return the favour by telling you what I think your problem is, dawg. The fact that we were cool until I jokingly called your thread cringe, and here we now are. None of what you've written has any relation to what I wrote, or to the thread title, so it's cool that your unrequited love led you on a personal journey towards preciousness, but I can't be arsed listening to your whining.

PM James, Josy, MTVN, or Niamh about me,

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11314400)

The BS and insincerity is off the scale and they fake call young Americans who vomit the same pointless worthless woke bilge that harry and meghan do

Watch the video for a real treat

Grinning Harry and Meghan put on a united display in surprise calls to young
people amid questions over Brand Sussex and their plunging US popularity - as
Archetypes source blames 'too much red tape' for £18m Spotify deal failing

• Couple call recipients of first Responsible Technology Youth Power Fund grants
• Video filmed in garden of Harry and Meghan's £12million mansion in California

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/08...0983848441.jpg

Harry, 38, also mentioned their children Archie, four, and Lilibet, two, telling
one winner in a call: 'Thank you for doing everything that you do. Our kids
especially are incredibly grateful.' Meghan, 42, then added: 'They don't know
it yet, but they will!' 🙄

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art....html#comments

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper (Post 11314586)

I like my paedophiles to be well mannered, too.

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11314562)

You’re right jet, Harry and Meghan are far worse than an actual peadophile.

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper (Post 11314586)

I like my paedophiles to be well mannered, too.

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11314832)

Bonking underage teens is far from being well mannered. Shame on you. :nono: :smug:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 11314851)

She looks like a zebra crossing.

Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 11314843)

She was seventeen. It makes him creepy af, but it doesn't make him a paedo.

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11314864)

Agree, which is why I said 'underage teen' and not paedo.

Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 11314868)

Fair.

Though even "underage" is relative - in the UK (where Andrew is from) and even in some states in the USA sixteen is legal; I actually think that is too young, and that the age of consent should be eighteen, but regardless, she wasn't underage by UK terms.

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 11314873)

he wouldn't have paid out millions if he was innocent

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 11314851)

She looks like a zebra crossing.

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11314832)

Bonking underage teens is far from being well mannered. Shame on you. :nono: :smug:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11314563)

precisely

its a false comparison

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/2N8_5LDkZwY/maxresdefault.jpg

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper (Post 11314913)

You spoke about the virtuous silence, my brother.

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 11314851)

She looks like a zebra crossing.

Originally Posted by arista (Post 11314849)

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/08...1100648239.jpg

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...d-display.html