Exactly !!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Meaning - those horrible people …


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Wasn’t that done in jest as part of his Downton persona?
That’s what I thought as he has already revealed that he is the product of a single parent family and he went to a pretty rough comprehensive school.

…I thought I recalled a comment from another housemate about some group chats being centred around sexual stuff etc…/…quite one dimensional and crude, type thing…it’s a natural thing to gravitate toward conversations and groups who it’s felt more comfortable to take part in…a more expansive conversation….it’s snobbery, it’s something that many of us do…like when we open a thread and don’t have anything to add so we move in elsewhere and something we feel more engaged in….

Yes,I think it was said in jest,you just have to get his humour,he seems a nice caring person from what I have seen.

What is the alternative to what you decry as Trish and two others displaying their 'superior intellect' gratuitously to the detriment of .other housemates?
Are you suggesting that, in order to conform to the stunted abilities of the others, they should patronize and belittle them by pretending they are confined to the same intellectual and cultural milieu in which several of the house's other residents fester?
Should they seek popularity and acceptance by agreeing to discuss the art of lighting farts with Paul or engage in conversations that, clearly, provide insuffiient stimulus. There is nothing wrong with being bright, and the law of averages suggests that for every bright spark there is a dying flame,, as so ably demonstrated by this BB community.
It is far more honest and conducive to a healthy atmosphere to behave exactly like the person you are, rather than to adopt the guise of an intellectual -also-ran in order to fit in. It is patronizing and dishonest and it demands that you compromise your values and your integrity .

P.S. You provide a fine example of toxic anti-intellectualism

Thank you for the compliment :hee:

Being able to mix with a diverse set of people is a fine trait to have and the whole point of BB. If you find yourself unable to have a conversation with someone then it's always worth considering how you can change that rather than just sneering at them for being 'confined' to a lower 'intellectual and cultural milieu'. People are rarely the two dimensional characters that they are made out to be and everyone has something different to offer.

I'm a council estate boy and I'd be snobbish about Paul.

…filling the quota for TiBB staff toxic anti-intellectualism minorities ….tick….

The only reason James keeps me around tbh

They are coming across that way a wee bit tbf yeah

Trish was correct about Paul. Okay to look at but no substance to him.

Half right … definitely no substance


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Trish likes to give advice but does she take it?

I think she would from her friends, she's not going to take advice from Kerry .

Would any sane person?

she is a very unattractive person

a bully and delusions of grandeur

and someone tell her that greasy red wig is disgusting

No need to attack looks. You haven't changed one bit in 84 years, LT.

Nope...except those that are paid to.

Yeah I think a chocolate teapot would give better advice :laugh: .

""Being able to mix with a diverse set of people is a fine trait to have and the whole point of BB"". Are you for real?? BB thrives on confrontation, encourages it, arranges it. Read the messages and listen to the audience in the in the show that follows BB. It is a key component for attracting the key BB demographic.

""If you find yourself unable to have a conversation with someone then it's always worth considering how you can change that.......""
Good grief, is THAT what you think BB wants and what attracts the key BB audience to the show? Love and peace, man!! Spliffs on the house. The show would fold in the second week;
Look how devious, dishonest, dissembling so many of the housemates are and how much attention is lavished on the miscreants. They were selected as housemates BECAUSE they are unpricipled and none-too-bright creatures of the night.
I am not sneering at them, I am merely telling it as it is.
Mind you, if I felt like sneering - and looking at Paul, Hallie, Olivia and the rotten Kerrie - I would not feel morally compromised in doing so.

""People are rarely the two dimensional characters that they are made out to be and everyone has something different to offer.""
What, pray tell, does Paul have to offer. A repertoire of fart-centric anecdotes
and space for rent in his cerebellum? What does Hallie have to offer apart from infantile histrionics and a self-serving approach to inter-personal relationships - she's a user of people and grows a cancer where her social conscience should be.

Your .suggestion that "people are rarely the two-dimensional characters they are made out to be". tells me nothing.. If you wish to make a point, you have to support it. Equally banal is the claim that "" everyone has something different to offer"", as it is made to look undernourished when the answer is "yes, and in the case of Hallie the something else that's on offer is malice, perhaps delusion, certainly an inexplicably massive ego". But then you declined to define the norm against which the "something else" you refer to is to be measured. A substantial omission.

Your post is undermined by a lack of clarity and consequently by a failure to support your contentions.

.

I disagree, conflict and confrontation should be only part of the show. There is very little confrontation currently anyway.

Spliffs on the house is the main part of your post which made sense to me and certainly seems like a good idea.

Both Hallie and Paul have lived vastly different lives to Jordan and Henry - that is what they have to offer

Your final paragraph reads just like the teacher's comments on my A-level history essay :sad: