![]() |
Quote:
|
This makes the vote pretty much "to save" instead of "to fake evict", seeing as both will stay and the one will stay next week
|
It's interesting how people think they've got a right to vote Charley out regardless if she's up. The producers fix it for Charley because the audience have proved several times that they can't help themselves from voting out the entertainment catalysts. People don't seem to get it that Charley creates a fire in the other housemates which makes them more entertaining aswell as Charley and her indivdual entertainment qualities.
Preventing Charley from being up for eviction is much the same process as a parent not letting a child eat all the biscuits from the tin at once. Given the chance, the child would attempt it, so parent needs to stand in and put the tin high on the top shelf, out of reach. And yes, the child screams and stamps it's feet like it's not fair, but it's for it's own good. :thumbs: |
In other words, presuming the story is true, - voting to evict in "fake week" is also a vote for immunity next week.
Obvious move to save Charley ........ again, but interesting should people who have already voted decide they want to complain to C4 that they were misled regarding what they were voting for, as the two, fake eviction and following weeks immunity would clearly be seen to be related. That should have been announced before voting began .... |
.
Preventing Charley from being up for eviction is much the same process as a parent not letting a child eat all the biscuits from the tin at once. Given the chance, the child would attempt it, so parent needs to stand in and put the tin high on the top shelf, out of reach. And yes, the child screams and stamps it's feet like it's not fair, but it's for it's own good. :thumbs: [/quote] That was well put! Couldnt have found a better parallel! |
Dont forget guys, the immunity thing is just speculation. I just read it on the DSS forum, that it came from a reliable source, so wait for confirmation I would say
|
Just because people don't get their way they think it's "rigged" :rolleyes:
|
I think it makes it more exciting if they win immunity and makes them coming back in more outrageous. I think if it was peoples fave in that situation they would share another opinion but the fact that it could be Charley is annoying everyone.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If this is true, then Nicks out next week |
It's a clever move from BB because it would no doubt cause yet another stir amongst the housemates.
|
Big brother has always been edited and changed along the way if people have such an issue they should simply just turn off. Bringing back Nikki was what really opened peoples eyes and some no doubt did turn off but also still alot enjoy watching and aslong as they get people who tune in they will continue to switch things to suit themselves.
|
Quote:
Jeez,fixed,my arse! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Its obvious who will get fake evicted this week,.,.if they (bb) had planned on making the evicted hm this week immune from nominations next week they should have said something about it. Now if they actually go ahead with this then there is plenty of evidence to support bb "rigging" the game so charley can stay another week. They have done it before.
That being said I have to agree with alot of you that charley definatly brings the crowds in. but I personally dont enjoy her brand of entertainment. If I wanted to see trash like charley I would just turn on the Jerry Springer show. Loud mouthed, finger knawinging,. butt smoking losers are a dime a dozen on that show. |
I find it hillarious that Charlie keeps dodging the bullets prayed out by rent-a-mob.
I just like the fact she is still there as it rubs certain people's noses in it, inside and outside the house. It was appauling that they were shouting for her to be got out before she went in. Why? Could there be a racial element still in Rent-a-mob? (Check eviction patterns over the years) In the last few years, with the bile one has to endure here in cyberspace, inflicting Charlie on the perpertrators is sweet justice. As to this rumour, if it is true and keeps her in, so much the better. |
I'M beginning to wonder if they actually bother with public votes..even if this is true and nicky get the mosts votes i think bb will just put charley out anyway.:rolleyes:
|
Quote:
I clearly saw all of the people who nominated Charley for eviction this week, which happens to be a fake eviction. If this immune thing is true (even though it might not be).. does it REALLY ****ING MATTER??? I mean seriously, Charley isn't going to win, we all know that. If Big Brother DOES really rig the vote to keep more entertaining people in, I really can't be mad at them... it's the idiot public that always tries to get people like Charley out. Can you imagine the first 6 weeks without Charley!??! What would that be like? You'd have the twins running around giggling, Liam being boring, Nicky complaining, Tracey saying "ave it!", Carole crying, and "Chiggy" breaking up and getting back together again the next day... how fun. |
If it is the case that the person who is fake evicted is immune next week then I wish they would have told us last week so people know the full extent of the twist.
They would probably get more people voting if it's all about immunity next week. |
I think it is an interesting twist in the tale so to speak. I do think though that the viewing public should be made aware of what they are voting for and when. I agree that Charley is the catalyst for a lot of the entertaining moments in the house but I dont agree with the makers being so corrupt in the way they handle the situation.
|
Quote:
|
I love Charley but you can tell that they are bending the rules to keep her in. From an unbiased point of view, i do think its slightly fixed
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.