Of course that's why they're doing it, however I don't actually see the issue with the doll either, end of the day it will either sell or it won't and they'll discontinue it if it's not selling for them :shrug:

Indeed. Matell is doing it to make money, and it also might make kids feel better about being represented in doll form. Both can be true.

I will never understand people who complain about things that are literally not doing any harm to anyone.

Councils
Would need a Discount.

I think it's a cynical, money-making ploy that tells kids, hey, you're different! I reckon it will have been a really short run of these dolls and not something that will continue because it will not be economically viable, even though there will always be diabetic kids.

I mean yeah of course they're doing it to make money but again I don't see the harm, if a kid has diabetes it's not like they don't know that and feel a bit different from their friends sometimes because they have to take meds etc, imo the doll is just normalising that a bit more, like if they had Barbie in a wheelchair (which i think they probably have done) and they have definitely had hospital barbie sets etc

What's different about a kid with diabetes? Nothing, except the meds they take and the food they eat. If Mattel was giving 10% of the profits to a diabetic charity I wouldn't think it was so very cynical. Yes there is a wheelchair Barbie and I have no problem with it. It probably helps kids with visible disabilities. Diabetes though? Any Barbie could be diabetic Barbie.

Again no idea what the harm in it is. All barbies are there to make money for Mattell :shrug:

I've read a lot of responses from people with T1D who are super happy with this.

I don't think you're being cynical in suggesting this is to make money, of course it is, but two things can be true at once: it can make money and it can make kids feel better about an illness they have.

T1D is visible to the person with T1D even if they hide wearable monitors electronic apps hidden from outsiders and is it visible on this Barbie?

It's just my opinion. If someone wants to buy one that's their business.

fair enough

Its just annoying that they pretend its for some altruistic reason and as you say its just to make them money and look good

But we can still call them out on it

Triggered by a Barbie. I thought this place had stooped to its lowest :laugh:

I think using a kids diabetes doll to have a swipe at members is a few degrees lower....

:spin:

Whatever helps you sleep at night big man

Glenn making his usual contribution to a thread.

Moaning about a kids toy? I’m sure that’s exactly the contribution this forum needs.

It's surely not for you to vet threads so they meet your strange criteria. It's certainly not for you to insult other members as your one and only contribution. But it's not wholly surprising.

Oh don’t flatter yourself, Livia. You’re acting like I burst into the thread swinging a machete when all I did was point out how ridiculous it is to be this emotionally disturbed by a doll. If that rattles you, maybe log off and have a juice box.

And let’s not pretend this forum is some sacred intellectual ground. Half the threads are people arguing over rainbow benches and whatever else theyve been told to be angry about. Calm down.

Number of threads made this year about "rainbow benches" = ONE

Number of posts that Glen made in that thread = 51



:whistle:

That wasn’t arguing hun, that was stating fact.

We’ll just add Diabetes Barbie to the long list of things that trigger the snowflakes :thumbs:

Oh, the company is being performative imo.

It's just is it really a big deal in this particular case?

We need Goth Barbie.:dance:

That'd be cool, or Grunge barbie for a special 90's edition :p

this Barbie made £300,000

https://www.canturi.com/blogs/news/b...tefano-canturi