Bells |
01-06-2008 09:18 AM |
I tend to agree with Simon the most when it comes to opinions, and I think he can bring humour to the show in his own way. He seems to have commanded a lot of respect, which is a good thing.
Amanda annoys me. I'll look past the fact that I had no idea who she was before BGT, and only knew her for cheating on her husband (Les Dennis, for those of you that don't know). Anyone who cheats on Les Dennis after years of marriage can't be the most likeable person. Anyway, based on her judging skills, the way she behaved with Strike made uncomfortable viewing - although the same could be said for Simon and Sophie Mei, I agree. She seems to have a fairly decent head on her shoulders compared to other female judges I've seen - I'll give her that. But her annoying shoulder dance and constant 'agreeing with Piers' starts to bug me after a while.
And Piers is just cringeworthy in general - won't even go into details. But overall, I think all three are a good panel (when they're not bickering too much), and add their own unique perspectives to the show. I just really don't agree with some of the acts Piers/Amanda jointly agreed to put through, that Simon stood against. That's another reason why I prefer Simon.
|