She had a different one. The one in her sig with "censored" on it, but it didn't have censored written on it...

Was there any beaver? I'm sorry I missed it.

No, but also I think she's under 18. LOL.

I don't see other members displaying pictures of themselves with their legs wide open with "censored" plastered on top.

It is skank. I don't mean it against her, I just don't think its appropriate for this forum.

That settles it then. We are all agreed on the fact that it's "skank".

Meeting adjourned. lol

:laugh2:

Ewwww 'beaver'

Lmao!! :laugh:
At least that's settled.

Thanx for that It a looks less "in your face" now.

Marks out of 10? I'd give her 1.

And someone takes it a tad too far :)

Why am I not surprised Nurse.

:whistle:

From what I'm guessing was in the picture, I have to ask

Why would you want that in your avvy?

What was the avatar?

It's in the sig now.

yea the last one Legs open and the black bar over it.

So hers was not ok but bright-eyes can have a man with his legs open and his hands down his pants?

Have you read the theard no one said she could not.

Plus we all know dale is over 18.

Yes, but it was called into question, where as yours has not. I personally could not care either way.

We know she is 18. Why should we not believe her. Don't you have to be 18 to get a tattoo?

No. I knew people who had tattoos when I was in year 9/10.

"No. I knew people who had tattoos when I was in year 9/10."

Well who ever did it broke the law. Have just checked. You have to be 18.

So, they are both 18 or over and have a photo with their legs open. What is the difference?

Loads ofpeople in my year have tatoos and they are 15/16

My friend is getting a tatoo shes only 15, id like a small cross on the back of my shoulder but im scared lol. Or id get angel wings on my back x

Well thank you for researching. I do not have a problem with the sig right now (and I never mentioned the av myself) but there was a difference when the sig was well over twice the size it is now. I still think she could be underage and a tatto does not prove anything. But right now the fact it does not take up 1/4 of my screen means I do not mind as much.

i think its inapropriate,but if it is then bemji and brigh-eyes avatar is kinda to.but i supose thats not actualy pics of themselves.