| bigbr0ther |
05-08-2008 10:01 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by dupin
Nikki & Luke were more popular than many of their other housemates, but also they were more unpopular than most of them, hence their eviction. If Nikki was widely popular, she would have cruised through the opening weeks, but she only beat Sam (not a popular housemate) by 53% - 47%, which indicated she had a lot of people that disliked her. Luke is the same, and I think he would have gone over Dale, because whilst with Nikki vs Sam, Sam didnt have many fans, Dale does, and so the act of Luke's fans voting to evict Dale would have been cancelled out by Dale's fans voting Luke, and overall, Luke was more unpopular than Dale.
|
Hm, that's fair. What annoys me is people saying Nikki was popular and Luke wasn't, when Luke was 2nd favorite to win and Nikki only 3rd. But if Nikki was unpopular than perhaps Luke was as well.
Quote:
Originally posted by Marcjswp
8 nominees would be expected to get 12.5% of the public vote each. Luke got 37% thats almost three times the average for that eviction!
|
What, because 100/8=12.5? :laugh:
Luke was a very big character. Most of the people up for eviction weren't even noticed because they didn't really do anything, like Rachel, Mohamed, Maysoon, and Kathreya. If it had been voting to save, there's no way Luke would have gone.
And, as I've said before, Nikki also got 37% of the vote when she was up with the whole house.
Quote:
Originally posted by SammyAyee
Yeah he got a great reaction but i don't think he would have stayed if he was up against Dale because that proved it when he was up against everyone last week
|
I understand the first part, but I don't see how the fact that he went last week shows that he would have gone if he were up against Dale. All it means is more people for his fans' votes to be divided up between. |
