Shaun |
22-09-2008 05:03 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by Lauren
Quote:
Originally posted by Shaun
Well it is really if you have less athletes to defeat in order to contend for one.
|
In the actual contention of the medal, there is the same number of athletes for the medal.
Furthermore;
Able bodied people in the World Vs. Able bodied people competing in the Olympics is lower than the number of Disabled people Vs. Disabled people competing in the Olympics.
Anybody able-bodied can train to the standard of Olympians, whereas disabled athletes have to endure excruciating pain when training, and take the extra step to compete.
The standard is still high... for example. Oscar Pistorius is "good enough" to compete against able-bodied athletes. This would obvious take more effort than that of ablebodied people.
There's also Natalie Du Toit who can also compete in the Olympics.
|
Taking Natalie Du Toit as an example; she won a lot at the Paralympics and decided to compete in that 5000m swim at the normal (hate to say that word because it implies...abnormality) Olympics [which GB got silver & bronze IIRC].
This goes to show the standard of the Olympics really, if (probably) the best Paralympian only managed 16th in an Olympic event.
And I find the claim that "any able-bodied athlete" can train to Olympic standard to be silly, really.
Although I applaud Kenny for his successes, and the other Paralympians, I think that it'd reek of PC if he won Sports Personality of the Year.
|