dude ... your not hearing me...
it's biased because the supporters of most hms couldn't be assd voting where as those supporters of more "controversial" hms are MUCH more likely to enter a poll thread because they've had to spend so much time defending their favs.
So they don't won't to think all that time was for nothing... so they always vote in these dumb polls..
Hence these polls are a waste!
You'll learn this if you ever do statistics at uni ... this is "skewed" data.
It's the same reason why telephone voting on"current affairs" shows is pointless ... only the passionate are assed to pick the phone hence the results aren't a true reflection of what the public really believe.

Obvs she was going to be fave on there, she had been for weeks,. she was fav to win on there too. :rolleyes:

I voted 32 times for Rachel, other Rachel's fans voted 50 times, 10 times, 5 times ect.

All fans of all the HM's could vote as many times as they wanted, nothing was stopping you voting for Mikey as many times as you life.

Rachel won fair and square.

like*