Problems with this theory... they wouldn't know how many phone calls it would take to swing the vote as Channel 4 don't release the numbers - for all they know it could be millions of votes, and secondly there is no-way to prove other members of the syndicate are actually making the calls they say they are. Everyone could just leave it to everyone else.

God sake. Ulrika won.........get over it.

it is members only pay to join site, if you dont all agree to do it then its not going to work, it works im a member of the site and yes we wanted ulrika to win and we all phoned in to vote for her to win and gess what? she did! we done it for rachael last summer mikey was a clear winner, but we could not have that now could we? so we phoned for the winner with best odds :dance2: if you look at all the online polls you will see the winners are never the online favorites its our betting syndicate that determines who wins.

people are saying it is fixed because the majority of people do not like her as they (rightly in my opinion) believe her to be cheap, bossy, attention seeking trash

People always say its a fix when someone who wasnt that popular wins.

My advice is: GET A LIFE

Its not fixed, get a grip. Annie is right: GET A LIFE.

Errm.. that complete crap because Mikey was the bookie's favourite too win!

belive what you like the polls tell you other wise! i have personally made over £2,500 off the back of this BB dont forget mikey lost to the better odds! do not waste money on who will win unless you are in the syndicate and want t make money. i dont care who wins I dont even watch the c*ap> just pay me!

sorry for repost. the syndicate all made small bets on mikey to win> he was favourite to win 1 because he was blind 2 because we wanted him to be the favourite so the least favourite rachael would win better odds = more £££ for the members. if you think anything other than that you are a fool. we do it on every popularity contest we fix it so we make £££ we know its money in it unlike a horse race we are on to a sure fi winner with this tried and tested system!

The polls here and elsewhere show that Ulrika was much disliked by many who obviously made their feelings clear on boards, in the press and elsewhere.
She also ranked high in the "favourite to win" polls which is why she gained a lot of votes. In other words she strongly divided opinion and there were few neutrals.
Nut ... only a nut would tell everyone about that marvellous scheme.

according to nut its fixed mate

so the true winner never wins then if what you write is true. what a bunch of tw*ts:nono:

I guess they took a break in fixing the show when Nadia and Pete, bookie's favorites from early on, won?

the syndicate was not made untill just after Nadia. ask your self? how have the ppl that won ever since when they have not been the favorite? think about it:thumbs:

Was anthony hutton and pete favourites ?

and shilpa?

I like what nut is saying. The small number of phone voters for CBB makes his claim quite believable. Also, his point that the bookies faveorite never seems to win any more give his claims even more credibility

I've posted many times on this forum that I'm not bothered who wins these shows but I too think there was something fishy about Ulrikas victory. She even alluded to a fix as she was announced the winner.

I dout it was a fix! If people genuinely didn't want her to win they she wouldn't have - she got the votes so people obviously liked her. I personally wanted Koolio or Terry to win but just because Ulrika wasn't loud, caused arguments doesn't mean she couldn't be liked by the public.

Terry and Vern were favorites from day one right up until the last day the crowd whould BOO the **** out of Ulrika they are the voting public also there are a few 100 in that crowd wich should give you some idea of what the general public are thinking and along the lines of how the phone vote would sway it used to be like that for for years, but not anymore why??? CH4 are not fixing it or they would be found out and the show would be axed.