Where on earth did you get that conclusion from.

1. I stated in post 1, these are provisional schedules.
2. The title has a question mark in it, implying uncertainty.

That text in the press pack is practically the same ever year.

You could have been more specific for instance "live feed maybe scrapped" it's not hard or did you just want more people to read your thread.

The launch date has yet to be formally announced so the schedules will be tentative.

All the overnight crap in those schedules are repeats that can be ditched without anyone caring as nobody watches them anyway.

I posted this before seeing or replying to your reply in the other thread. Your attempts to discredit me are getting slightly desperate now.

Only time will tell as regards if it's scrapped on E4 though. I highly doubt it though.

Yep. Pointed that out on the D.S. thread.

It's a typical Digital Sid post unfortunately.

Building hopes up and talking the talk, but not delivering with conviction.

He even covered his tracks by making sure he edited the word "provisional" into his Opening post after I told him that the schedules would not be confirmed until Wednesday. For someone who claims to have "a lot of media knowledge" that was a pretty big howler. :cheer2::pat:

Proof? :sleep: :bored:

Guys, let's not fall out before the show starts!

C4 are the enemy. Unless they surprise us with extra coverage.

Well I did read your opening post around the time you first posted it.

It didn't have the "provisional" word in there.

Of course I can't physically prove this, as I don't do print screen shots of everyone's posts. But I know I'm not lying, and that you are being a fibber.

Pardon me for assuming my fellow posters were able to read.

Stop argueing you lot. I thought this forum was here for mature and grown-ups to discuss Big Brother.

I added it 5-10 minutes after posting when I worried people might assume this to be a final decision and panic. Mods can clarify this if they so wish :thumbs:.

I don't want to cause any argument, but this problem has been caused by the opening poster.

They really should be more careful about what they post, because it can be a let-down very often.

It is but unfortunately some oiks slip through the net. Perhaps time to tighten up ristrictions on these forums?

It is no wonder the forum I shall not name is so reviled around here when some of the more immature posters on it would probably get ripped to shreds on there.

All i could see was e4 covarage scrapped aswell tell me how that's not misleading.

If you've got problems with another poster, please take it to the U2U facilities.

I do agree. Sometimes it's annoying when they claim to know an insider or say that they are one.

I call them trolls. :eureka:

Don't worry Max. You're in the right. As usual Digital Sid posted something which failed to deliver, and now for some reason he's blaming you which is ridiculous.

I've no problem just people posting misleading titles.

Again, the question mark at the end of it :rolleyes:.

President already did.

How about you make up, it was a simple missunderstanding between you both. It happens all the time. I hope you sort out your differences, because I for one, don't want it happening from here until September. I come here to have fun and discuss Big Brother. Do I make sense?

Hmm, yes. I've been on here more than usual this week because DS has become very negative and I want to feel enthusiastic, at least until we see if the Housemates are any good.