I agree with you Sticks, she said that her children were her biggest priority and they meant the world to her. If that was so true, why would she leave a seven month old baby? Who is looking after it? She said she doesnt get on with the dad so he clearly doesnt have the child.
This baby is at the stage where its growing the most in its life and its mother isnt going to be around. And we all know that she is going to get upset and cry about it, saying she misses it and then wont even be an entertaining housemate.

Unfortunately she became a full HM

Oh well her little baby will develop VERY well without her.

obv the kids are still seeing their dads.

The children are being looked after, so whats the problem?

In my oppinion, the children are so young that they will easily adapt to her not being there, and then will easily adapt when she comes back. I don't see what the big problem is.

I'd just like to point out to Sticks that whilst I appreciate his concerns regarding social services, with regard to the Fran Lyon case and along with the rest of the media and many others who have decided to throw in their t'penny worth, he knows nothing about the real issues in the case, Fran's history, or the reasons behind the action taken by social services, and what their plans really were (as oppossed to what Fran and the media reported their plans were).

I am in a position to know what took place and would appreciate if Sticks did not perpetuate myths that he has no evidence for other than what is printed in his morning newspaper.

It is not just the Fran Lyon case.

I am in contact with others who problems with social services as well as John Hemming MP.

Since Northumberland Social Services have signed off on the Fran Lyon Case, maybe you could reveal what you have.

This was the final word in the press on the Fran Lyon case

Apologies for the thread hijack

I find it interesting that the above was Mollypapa's first post on the TiBB forum.

I would like to hear "The other side", because the SS usually hide behind some kind of "We can not discuss individual cases" rhetoric so we can not challenge their reasoning.

How about taking this discussion here

ffs, is it a social workers meetin in here or somethin? she could be doing it to make a better life for her kids, i am sure she has left them with a loving grandparent or somethin, when ur the top person on bb that says who can and cant become a house mate then u can say she shouldnt be a housemate

This.

To be honest i dont think she seems a very nice person in general so will surely be booted out soon enough and then maybe she will realise her priorities in life

You have a few facts wrong there Sticks. It's not good to embellish the truth to get your point across.

Get a real life.

Saffia should become a housemate because shes good contribution to the show. and shes not realy that bad

I don't think Sticks should air his views on here, although he is entitled to his opinion. Well, here is mine. I have no doubt that BB would check Saffia had arranged for child care before she went in. I think Sticks is wrong to accuse Saffia of neglecting her children by going in the house. So by Stick's reckoning, no-one with children should be allowed to go into the house then. What does he think about men and women with children that are in any of the armed forces. Suppose he would frown upon that. This is a light-hearted forum for people interested in BB, whether we want to moan about them or rave about them.
Sorry, I have gone on a tad but he wound me up! Anyway that aside, I like Saffia and don't particularly like Sopia ( for moaning at Saffia) or Sree (cos of what he said to Carly in last nights show)