Their was nothing wrong with the way I responded to him, provided you have the mental capacity to handle such confidence crushing terms as 'bugger off' and 'high horse'. Dont confuse the fact that I like to make occasionaly long, critical posts for being pissed off.

Again, your just cheesed off. Funny to watch :joker:.

What was this then?

Honestly, what were you expecting? A rubdown and a foot massage?

so, anyway
yeah
i really miss the sunday night psychology show

Well, I do have the mental capacity. :pat:

I just feel you can say those things in a better more articulate way.

Of course, you can say it how you want to. But I just think there's no need for it, as there's better ways of explaining the same thing to people.

But hey ho, I know I'm not going to change how you talk to people. But just offering some advice: Take it or leave it. I don't really care :bigsmile:

Im not cheesed off at all :laugh:. I'm actually laughing at how stressed out you seem :pat::laugh3:

Turn that frown
upside down.

If you were not cheesed off you would never have bothered to send me retarded U2U's. Honestly, I just fear for peoples mental capacity when they think someone who they cant see or dont know is stressed. Me disagreeing with you does not equate to me being stressed. Me making long, critical posts on forums does not equate to me being stressed.

Congratulations though. You almost covered up your patronisation in that post with your little concerned counsellor character.

Dont get me wrong. Just because I think your being this gigantic dick does not mean I have any intention of suicide or feelings of fleeting depression.

Your just red faced because I pointed out, quiet obviously, that you were attempting to plug one of your newly created threads in here. And you have spent every post since acting like a child over it.

Yeah i miss that too, remember "on the couch" i much prefer that to BBLB or BBBM.

I just needed confirmation that you hate me. I'm 100% certain now :thumbs2:.

Oooh, thanks for caring :wink:. I don't know how mental capacity and concern are related to each other, but oh well... :joker:

Of course not. :hugesmile:

Okay, for sure. But sometimes there seems to be an underlying attitude within your posts of annoyance.

I'm probably wrong, eh? AT the end of the day you're going to defend yourself. Good for you :bigsmile:.

As I said before, I'm not concerned. I don't care if you take my advice or not. :pat:

Of course :laugh3:

I'm not red faced at all :laugh: . I'm smiling, laughing, cheerful atm :spin: .

I was only joking around when I plugged my thread anyways, hence the ";" and me being sarcastic by saying "top class analysis". If you got so stressed over that, I do feel sorry for you. Lol :hello:

So me making a one line post pointing out that I thought you were thread plugging is stress. But you having to send me a PERSONAL MESSAGE to wonder if I hated you and then follow it up with a subsequent smear campaign is nothing stress/paranoia related at all? Oh ... okay.

Well done on the great arguments you have constructed though. Saying 'of course' and tacking on a few hundred smileys always works a treat when your losing your rag and trying to appear more at peace with yourself than the other guy.

Nope it's not the one line post at all. It's the subsequent comments you've made.

Lol. I'm not losing my rag atl all. I'm finding this quite amusing actually.

Someone to actually debate with, who stands their ground. It's been a month since I joined, and at last it's happened. Cheers :bigsmile:

I'm going to the pub.

Well of course I am going to follow it up with comments if you start sending me creepy U2U's. And of course I am going to defend myself if your trying to slam me as being stressed just because I think you are a dick. Which I have only been thinking for an hour, mind you. All just because you had to send me an OTT U2U because of ONE SIMPLE POST that I made. Can you not see how retarded you have let this play out? It's pathetic.

Think I am going to join you :wink:.

it's for over 18's

My U2U was not only because of that one post you made. I've just generally had a bad vibe from you, therefore asked you whether you hated me or not. Simple as.

I didn't really "slam" you when I said I think you're a bit stressed out. It just seemed that way from point of view. Not a "slamming".

You make it sound like a Daily Star headline: "The President slams little Stu" :laugh2: .

Hey, if you do really think I'm a dick, put me on your "Ignore" list. It'll be a pleasure.

Nice one mate! :thumbs: :wink:

well, not really, it was a bit cheap.

Well then I can honestly say, hand on heart, I have NO idea where you got this vibe from. People disagree with each other on forums. Get over it. I may have disagreed with you in the past. It did not mean I hated you. If you really felt the need to tell me I was stressed out, you could have put it in a U2U like most other normal people tend to do. It's not exactly something you call somebody out on in the middle of a public forum discussion to use as some sort of daft ammunition from your ill fated argument. Like it or not this is a problem you have created, and I think you secretly know at least a part of that is true. I am simply fighting my corner, as anybody would.

Good then, because I am 18 :thumbs2:.

I shall take on your advice, and next time U2U you when I think you've gone too far :thumbs:[/quote]

Nope. I didn't cause any problem. You called someone to "bugger off".

I thought it was out of order, so I told you that what I told you in defence of Chuckyegg. :hugesmile:

Bugger off is hardly something violent, is it? And I know for a fact you would NEVER have stood up for him and called me out on my bugger off comment if I had not of rattled your chain about five minuets prior. Dont even try to deny that one. You simply saw opportunity and you grabbed it.

Nope not forgotten that bit. But I've already explained why I said I thought you were stressed. No need to go over it once again. Just read my previous posts for my explanation.

Noted, in my previous post.

I never said it was "violent". Can you provide me proof that I actually said it was "violent" :puzzled: ?

Incorrect. I would have done the same thing. In fact on another thread, a troll was saying something rude to someone else and I tried to help that person out.

The U2U thing didn't affect this situation at all. I would have reacted the same way, I really would have.

I don't expect you to believe me obviously, but hand on heart I would have done the same thing irrespective of a U2U or not.

Your right, I dont believe you. Because I think it is FAR too much of a coincidence. One minuet after a U2U that left a bitter taste in your mouth, you 'backed up' another member because I told him bugger off, which of course as you have now said yourself, is not violent in the slightest.

But hey, this is a no win situation for me, because your going to do your best to make me look like the biggest tool on the planet whatever the cost. And all because I thought you plugged a thread.

*sigh*

I don't want to make you look like a tool at all, in all honesty.

I'll just defend my case, that's it. You're entitled to defend your side of the argument (which you have), so fair enough.

And what exactly is your case, then? Because the focal point of your 'back up' seems to me is that I am stressed, and the focal point of your argument against me seems to me is that apparently, you got bad vibes off me all along.

Do you even have a case? Because I have absoloutely no idea where your going with this. You just got cheesed off that I thought you were plugging a thread, and subsequently blew you off in a U2U, didint you?

My initial argument was:

"Lol chucky, ignore him. He always seems p****d off for some reason"

This was after you said the following to chucky:
"Oh bugger off, will you?...Get off your high horse. It's a soft landing. "

After that, you responded to me to bring up the whole U2U conversation: "I dont like you because you send me annoying, attention grabbing U2U's".
---

From then on, I've simply debated my case against everything you've said to me. That's all.

Yeah, I brought up the U2U convorsation because, lets face it, thats why you responded to the bugger off comment. And at the time you gave absoloutely no other evidence as to why I might be stressed/P.O'ed.

Again, what exactly IS your case you have defended ever since? That I am stressed?

This is getting insane. And if you call some of those earlier, multi-quote, choc-fulla-smileys posts 'cases' and 'debates' well then ... I give up.

To be honest, I think you overeacted and landed yourself in a situation we are still stuck in. All because, like I said, I blew you off in a U2U because I think you sent me a daft message. And ALL because, like I said, I made a one line post depicting you as a thread plugger.

This is going nowhere fast. But I can see the pits you have fallen in to. Your were just over reacting and babbling nonsense. Thats not worth hate. Bah, I dont hate you at all.

As I've noted already, your U2U did not affect whether I reponded to your comment or not.

In hindsight, yes perhaps I should have wrote a reason as to why I thought you were pissed off. I shall be more thorough the next time I make an accusation to anyone.

I have just answered back to all the comments you've made in response to me, every single quote you've made. There's no core case, but just various opinions from you to which I've answered back to.

Fair enough.

I don't think I've over-reacted. I just want to make my points clear to you in response to your comments. At the end of the day, it was you who firstly overreacted with the following comment:

"Apart from the fact that I dont like you because you send me annoying, attention grabbing U2U's explain that statement for me please?

So not liking the psychology show makes you a bit pissed off? And defending yourself from someone who says you just want to watch people sunbath all summer makes you pissed off?

Have you any idea what the term actualy means? "
---
You basically asked me a load of questions, and so I answered them.

Nope. As I have said numerous times, that hasn't affected anything on my part. Maybe to you it has, I don't know.

If you insist.

I don't think I've fallen into any pits at all. I'm alright at the moment, completely fine.

Once again, I don't think I over-reacted. At the end of the day, it was you who asked me loads of questions in the first place. So I answered them.

That's fundementally where this whole conversation stemmed from, I believe.

It's nice to know that :wink: