See the above reply, and also the original post was not about the effect this has on the people ringing the numbers, but the effect it has on the result of the eviction.

Also I am reporting you to the mods for accusing me of "condoning fraud." Don't ever put words in to my mouth again.

Why don't you try actually reading my post instead of going off on one?
:rolleyes: Where have I accused YOU personally of condoning fraud?

"I cannot believe that people on this forum are condoning fraud"

This combined with the fact is was a rely directed to my quote was insinuating that the insult was aimed at me.

Please don't reply to my posts anymore unless you are going to be civil :wavey:

Aw Angus(shakes head)you didn't,why are people so quick to take things the wrong way:conf:

Why are people so quick to be aggressive and throw accusations around? :cat:

How on earth was that aggresive:conf:

I'm talking about Angus' initial reply to my initial post. not yours, you were cool :dance:

He came across quite aggressively.

I don't know why I bother with this forum sometimes. All I want is some conversation and banter about BB, but you can't post anything without someone jumping down your throat.

You can always put me on ignore:xyxwave: Meanwhile I shall continue to reply to all posts with which I agree or disagree since, last time I looked, this was a public forum.

BTW
"It's hardly worth worrying about." This was YOUR response regarding the scams, not mine.

That's cool. The point is you jumped right down my throat without even addressing what I had wrote. My original post was all about how in my opinion these scams have very little bearing on the overall result of the evictions. Nothing to do with the effect it has on people who fall for them.

However you quoted me and then went off on a rant about people being ripped off, which had nothing to do with what I had posted and then implied that I was 'condoning fraud.'

I welcome opposing views and disagreements and even being proved wrong. But I get pissed off with this forum sometimes when people start accusing you of things you have not even said, and have a go at you instead of debating properly.

Anyway let's leave it there shall we or we could end up going round in circles all night :spin:

I'm not bothered - I was actually referring to certain FMs on other threads who have been gloating at how brilliantly the scams worked. Having said that, I went back and re-read his post and my response and I noted that it stated that he didn't think it mattered in terms of numbers of votes, and yet all I pointed out was that it would matter to those who were out of pocket.

But read that in context of what i had wrote above it. It means it's not worth worrying about the effect it has on the eviction results. :wavey:

Fair enough. I enjoy a good debate and would just point out that I was actually referring to certain FMs who shall remain nameless who positively gloated on this forum about the scams after Ben was evicted. I realise you were talking in terms of the fact that the votes fraudulently obtained may be negligible, but I was referring to the money ripped off from naive people tricked into ringing these numbers. Just a misunderstanding I guess:spin:

That's cool. Guess there was a bit of miscommunication both ends. :blush:

If people on here were gloating about the scams then that is totally out of order

No :laugh:

Good:joker::joker: