![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
*wonders if Patrick earns a few bucks based on piece-work for how many insults and swearing he can manage in one thread* :D As for the bit in red - that's hysterical (literally !!) - all things considered! Deary me....... !!! Straight back on topic ..... It will probably receive rubbish ratings, probably won't be as good as the earlier years and will most likely never to reach the heights that it did years ago. Why do I say that? It's my view on it. Negative or not - it's my view that I'm putting up on the subject of Big Brother 12 being on Channel 5 - WITH OR WITHOUT DAVINA. ;) |
The topic was about Davina possibly returning not what the show will be like.
|
Quote:
|
I wouldn't know I am always right first time ;)
|
Quote:
Now. What was that you were saying about, [sic] "...Always right first time" :laugh2: |
:bored:
This conversation is over. |
I really cannot see it failing on Channel 5, it will obviously not get the ratings it got on Channel 4 but the ratings it will get will be deemed a big success for Channel 5.
I don't really want her to do it again but I do feel if they had Davina presenting then that would actually help the ratings at least for a while. |
Quote:
:hugesmile: |
No, I let you have this one it obviously made you feel better about yourself. :wink:
|
Quote:
It's even more amusing, watching them trying desperately to cover it up. :D Ten out of ten for effort. Zero out of ten for effect. ;) Hey, the world loves a trier though !! ps. Thought you'd ended 'this conversation', 2 posts ago? And they say women are fickle !! LOL |
Quote:
Now back on topic... to something unrelated. Okay :laugh: |
omg 08marsh u are such a bad BB fan xxxx u should be blindly looking forward to a channel 5 show on the basis of JohnnyBB's wild guesses!!!!
|
Quote:
You dreamer How can she she has 2 contracts a big one with Ch4 and another with ITV1. May Have Implied? No she said with Dermot Ch5 will be great for Big Brother how do you get so confused. |
Quote:
*checks back posts* Nope, not me. I just happened to give my opinon on some of the posts on the thread. (Which, bizarrely, this being a forum, I am permitted to do so). I also added in my own view. Unlike your good self who seems hell bent on being troublesome for the sake of it. ;) |
This thread. <3
|
Quote:
Sorry for thinking the topic is what is in the OP and title. :joker: And im not being troublesome just pointing out a mistake you made whilst been catty to a member who cannot reply atm. My following posts to that are irrelevant. I should have known you cannot tell the difference between a serious post and ones that are in jest. ;) |
Quote:
As long as they remain on the thread, I and anyone else, can refer to them (or indeed, any other post that has been made and is able to be read).Re BIB. Your use of the winky smiley shows clearly what your intention has been..... less than jovial, and more with jags. Now, perhaps you'd like to allow the thread to continue in the manner that it was raised for - rather than trying to perhaps be seen to be trying to 'bait' and antagonise another member? Thank you. |
Quote:
If I am infact only trying to bait then you took to it very well didn't you. :shrug: |
Quote:
|
Couldn't help but notice you swear Patrick so I'm just going to point it out to you again!!! :blush: :hugesmile: :shocked: :wavey: :nono:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
_ |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.