ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB12 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=586)
-   -   Now that Jay has been put up for eviction when he wasn't nominated... (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=188971)

spitfire 26-10-2011 10:23 PM
Say bye bye to the Waggot on Friday.:xyxwave:

flamingGalah! 26-10-2011 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 4690052)
The point remains though, that if they really were intent on Jay winning or reaching the final, they very easily could have avoided putting him up for eviction this week
They couldn't though could they? They already have it in the ear about their favouritism towards Jay & their treatment of Aaron (they have mentioned the fans anger about this previously on BOTS) so they had no choice but to do this...

Jedwardhater 26-10-2011 10:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 4690975)
Jay did crap in the freezer Mr Rochester as BBBOTS confirmed it a couple of weeks ago.
Said poop is now taking bids on ebay.

MTVN 26-10-2011 10:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr rochester (Post 4690900)
without prejudice.

There were fairly large legal ramifications here which is why 'nothing has been said'. In addition to this there are various controversial issues vis. health and safety - I suspect (although I might not be right) that Production have possibly intervened here and advised that a line should be drawn under this episode asap. This is the stuff that (potential) production nightmares are made of in some cases. Having said that - the likelihood of anyone's safety being compromised as a result of this (if indeed it did happen) is fairly remote. I am sure channel 5 adhered to toxic waste disposal laws to the letter, should this have become necessary. It's all unfortunately unsavoury - if it happened. If it did not then there is no problem whatsoever but possibly Jay will sadly be remembered for an untrue 'allegation'. Probably time for everyone to move on from the notion. The legal team would have this boxed off before you could say Tom, Dick or Harry to win.
Interesting post, wouldn't disagree with any of that

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamingGalah! (Post 4691031)
They couldn't though could they? They already have it in the ear about their favouritism towards Jay & their treatment of Aaron (they have mentioned the fans anger about this previously on BOTS) so they had no choice but to do this...
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't it the norm to cancel the eviction in this situation? Would make a lot more sense to me considering we have already had one house mate leave this week, or if they didn't do that I think it would be fairer to put the whole house up, at least then it's a collective thing, just doesn't seem right to punish Faye and Jay because Jem decided to walk

StraightEdge695 26-10-2011 10:41 PM
dont split votes...

boomoo 26-10-2011 10:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 4689553)
Can we stop all the "BB want him to win, they're protecting him, he's the chosen one" crap?

Edit - and I know that he did receive nominations, but not enough to be up for eviction and less than Harry, if they did really want to keep him there they would either make it an Aaron vs Harry head to head or just cancel the eviction like most people would expect
Too scared to have Aaron and Harry in case Harry stayed.

Mystic Mock 26-10-2011 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by boomoo (Post 4691236)
Too scared to have Aaron and Harry in case Harry stayed.
Incase Aaron stayed more like.

boomoo 26-10-2011 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 4690975)
Jay did crap in the freezer Mr Rochester as BBBOTS confirmed it a couple of weeks ago.
Get it right. He did it in a box which he put in the freezer.
When you are on the bowel cancer rota you will find that pooing in a box and sending it through the post is routine event.

Putting it in the freezer is a health and safety issue.. as it can cause the spread of e-coli.
But the freezer is an upright not a walk in freezer.
Mark was a major player in these disgusting pranks and he has been crude everytime he has been on TV since, usually nude. He is obsessed. That is why he left because Jai became interestred in Louise and bored with his pranks.

Jesus. 26-10-2011 11:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by boomoo (Post 4691303)
Get it right. He did it in a box which he put in the freezer.
When you are on the bowel cancer rota you will find that pooing in a box and sending it through the post is routine event.

Putting it in the freezer is a health and safety issue.. as it can cause the spread of e-coli.
But the freezer is an upright not a walk in freezer.
Mark was a major player in these disgusting pranks and he has been crude everytime he has been on TV since, usually nude. He is obsessed. That is why he left because Jai became interestred in Louise and bored with his pranks.
I don't think fag packets are a preferred method for the transportation of substances hazardous to health. What Jay did was thouroughly disgusting, and there is no excuse that can be made for him, but the blatant cover up also equally disturbing.

I ado agree about Mark though, he's a complete twat and another thoroughly disgusting individual.

Pyramid* 26-10-2011 11:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pimpslapper (Post 4689758)
They've given up with Jay. Alex is now the new chosen one.
I'm going with this..... they realise Jay is a dud. Note: note DUDE, but dud. As in damp squid.

I can't help but feel that this has all come round and bit Big Brother on it's rather ample arse. I for one am happy to see it. I will be even happier once Faye, Jaye and Louise are kicked out.

rusticgal 27-10-2011 12:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 4689592)
He got less nominations than Harry, really they should have cancelled the eviction, that's what most would be expecting and if they wanted to keep Jay in they would either do that or make it an Aaron vs Harry head to head

They cancelled Jems boyfriends vote which meant that Harry..Jay and Faye all had two votes.

Pyramid* 27-10-2011 12:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 4691586)
They cancelled Jems boyfriends vote which meant that Harry..Jay and Faye all had two votes.
Correct.

MTVN 27-10-2011 12:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 4691586)
They cancelled Jems boyfriends vote which meant that Harry..Jay and Faye all had two votes.
Yeah I know, but I don't really see any reason for that being done, it's not the norm to have walker's nominations cancelled, but even so it is normally the case that the eviction would be cancelled this week. Like Harry was saying on BOTS it's not fair that they'd be led to believe they were safe for the next week and then to suddenly be told you're up for eviction because Jem decided to walk.

It's just BB trying to get more money out of people imo

Rawrbear 27-10-2011 11:09 AM
Emma Mentioned the freezer on bbots when introducing Vanessa Veltz

joeysteele 27-10-2011 11:29 AM
The nominations of Jemma's boyfriend were discounted so that meant Jay, Harry and Faye had the same figure, however,I agree mostly with MTVN in that if Jay was still the golden boy, they would have likely found a way to avoid him being put up, likely by some other nominations twist.

For me, since they didn't plan a double eviction and one up for eviction walked anyway,the best thing to have done would have been to cancel the eviction.
The far more sensible thing to have done though was to 'not' have the relatives nominate anyway, especially 2 sets of nominations from connections to one family too.

Phil 27-10-2011 11:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 4692271)
The far more sensible thing to have done though was to 'not' have the relatives nominate anyway, especially 2 sets of nominations from connections to one family too.
Precisely! I'm not even rooting for Aaron to win but, by the time Endemol has finished trying to twist the nominations, I'll end up voting to help him out of a sense of injustice on his behalf. Stop laking about Endemol & let the public deliver all the surprises; we're good at it - ask the bookmakers.

Flamingjoe 27-10-2011 12:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 4689592)
He got less nominations than Harry, really they should have cancelled the eviction, that's what most would be expecting and if they wanted to keep Jay in they would either do that or make it an Aaron vs Harry head to head
They made Jem's nominations null and void which was fair, meaning that Jay was technically nominated.

mr rochester 27-10-2011 12:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamingjoe (Post 4692415)
They made Jem's nominations null and void which was fair, meaning that Jay was technically nominated.
I have never understood why BB does not make it a contractual rule that if anyone walks they have to nominate 3 other housemates to go up for eviction (this might stop the walkers walking) or even make it a rule that the entire house go up for eviction.

This would serve two good purposes;

1) There would be enormous peer group pressure NOT to walk...

2) If someone did walk it would then allow the public to vote out those who get under the radar and stay in until the end having not made terribly interesting watching.

Sometimes it's quite hard to wait until a HM is nominated to get the chance to cast a vote for them.

In addition to all of the above - the Production team would not come under so much heavy fire for 'having favourites'. I believe this would make it a much more even playing field.

Raven 27-10-2011 01:10 PM
It should have either been cancelled (Which they don't make money from) or been Aaron Vs Harry (Which might have ment Aaron going)... neither of which they wanted, so they decided for the FIRST TIME EVER to cancel a walkers noms in order to make it a four way.... totaly unfair on Faye and Jay, one of which is being sacraficed.

flamingGalah! 27-10-2011 03:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raven (Post 4692534)
It should have either been cancelled (Which they don't make money from) or been Aaron Vs Harry (Which might have ment Aaron going)... neither of which they wanted, so they decided for the FIRST TIME EVER to cancel a walkers noms in order to make it a four way.... totaly unfair on Faye and Jay, one of which is being sacraficed.
I very much doubt that they did it to save Aaron, who they have been screwing over for weeks!

It wasn't just that Jem was a walker that her nominations wre cancelled, but the fact she was up for eviction herself, so that completely changes things. It would have been even more unfair if Harry had simply been put up. They did actually mention this would happen to Jem before she decided to leave for good as well & let her know that if she walked her own sister would be put up for eviction, so maybe it was a ploy by BB to stop her from walking...


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27 PM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.