Yes indeed,where WAS he mother?10 years old?I'm shocked,I was still playing with dolls then,I found the comments on the site worse than the video

Good lord .... did you read post #197!

I can't get sound on the video shown, so don't know how bad that is. But the vid itself :o


My goodness, the reading stuff is bad, but why oh why was she not supervised at such a young age or taught morals of some kind? if it's true that is. I can't understand that? I can now understand more her release of h*te towards people on that site linked, maybe she realised her life style was not right and was rebelling?

Wasn't Alex's mother supposed to be a member of this forum at some point? I'd be interested to hear her thoughts on this latest bit of publicity, featuring her daughter at fourteen years old. She must be so proud, and also lucky this vid didn't end up as Exhibit A in a court case.

I don't see a problem with it either, I agree, they're just mucking about. I was just correcting MTVN who said it wouldn't be rape if Alex had consented to sex.

I wouldn't believe everything you read on there. One of the names mentioned, Dave The Rave is well known in the North East and the allegations on there about him and Alex are very hard to believe. He's a bit, how shall I phrase this - mentally challenged, but essentially a really nice bloke, devout Christian tee-totaller but really into dance music and totally harmless. I find the idea that he had any kind of sexual relationship with Alex quite frankly laughable, if it wasn't such a horrible slur on them both.

At 14??? :shocked:

Not 100% sure, but I think it's 12 years and younger when it's classed as that.

Its awful reading - the 2007 forum speaks of very much the same thing ..... her reputation in the NE is just awful. I actually feel sorry for the girl if she has indeed really been sexually active since 10 :(

I didn't say that though, I was just responding to the person who said "Isn't that rape" saying that we can't call it that when we have no idea if they even had sex with her or not

written about Jay

"Ha ha jay will get pist start mcing to himself start to tell storeys about good old days at hangar and monkey then rip his top off do the peck dance and maybe start a fight ha ha its what he does every night he goes out.

Be funny watching jay his a good lad. " :o

I'm fairly sure it's 16, which is why 16 is referred to as the age of consent - up to that age you're deemed incapable of giving consent, so any sexual act would be rape. This site confirms it too:

http://www.avert.org/teens-sex-law.htm

My apologies then, I interpreted your post saying "Think it would only be rape if they, well, actually raped her" as implying that it wouldn't be if she'd consented. Perhaps you should have said "had sex" and not "rape" in your original post. That would have made it clearer and less open for misinterpretation.

I need subtitles.:conf:

Yes some stuff about Jay too,they must be quite well known round there

She is/was a member of the ultimate buzz forum, she was a very popular forum member for various reasons. Mostly for being very ditzy, but there are some scandalous allegations about her as other people have posted.

Her & Jay are not well known in the North East, put were definately popular in the rave scene. Alex was going to events, private parties since she was very young. Jay was mcing at some of the events Alex probably went too.

Right, and that seems obvious TBF

I've picked up somewhere where the law states that having sex with someone under the age of 13 it's automatically statutory rape. Whereas sex between two people over 13 and under 16 could be seen as not rape.



http://www.fpa.org.uk/professionals/factsheets/lawonsex

Absolutely - It's mind boggling. Like you, I still thought it was for weeing out of at that age :shrug:

It all hindges on whether those she had sex with were over 16 or not.

By what I read .......and yes, sadly I read the lot, they were 18

It doesn't matter what the ages of the person are if the girl's under 16, it's still statutory rape, it just means that in cases of girls aged 13-16 a defense can be entered stating that they thought they were over 16.

"There is no defence of mistaken belief about the age of the child, as there is in cases involving 13–15 year olds. "

I don't think so, they can still be charged with statutory rape even if they're under 16, though the ages are taken into consideration with sentencing.

are they the same pink shorts she has in the house lol

Urg I don't like her
 

I saw this online the other day and it was similar to the video - Z-Lister


I just think she's well fake!

:elephant:

Alex obviously got involved with the wrong crowd...people she trusted betrayed that trust, hopefully BB will change her life forever so she never has to be around ****wits like that again...I'll be voting for her