ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB12 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=586)
-   -   Channel 5 in trouble with Ofcom (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=193071)

King Gizzard 19-12-2011 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samuel. (Post 4825813)
What kind of forum has mods that don't post? :suspect:

DS if I remember correctly

Samuel. 19-12-2011 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jingle Bellend (Post 4825818)
DS if I remember correctly

Weird. I don't see how having posters as mods would be problematic; it's worked for every other forum I've been on.

How boring for the DS mods. And what's to say they wouldn't be just as opinionated as a poster would be.

thesheriff443 19-12-2011 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Little Donkey (Post 4825726)
So the job of a mod is to read every thread and look out for any insulting posts, and they're not allowed to voice their own opinion on post anywhere?

Piss off back to DS or wherever you're from.

thanks for your insult! i rest my case!

Doogle 19-12-2011 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesheriff443 (Post 4825845)
thanks for your insult! i rest my case!

No problem. :love:

Hold on, how does that rest your case, I'm not a mod.

thesheriff443 19-12-2011 10:20 PM

my case is,if you cant put your opinion across without haveing to insulting me!,
then you show your ignorance to all on here,

Incensed 19-12-2011 10:21 PM

PC gone mad, and if you think kids don't know swear words then I give up!

Quite how this thread has become a mods v FM's is another point I don't understand.

You can be the best parent in the world and vet your childs viewing habits, but they will still hear it in the big bad world out there. Much better imo is to acknowledge real life, and educate your children about what is acceptable and what isn't! Don't try and wrap them in cotton wool and pretend it doesn't exist, it does, deal with it appropriately.

Omah 19-12-2011 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Incensed (Post 4825870)
PC gone mad, and if you think kids don't know swear words then I give up!

You can be the best parent in the world and vet your childs viewing habits, but they will still hear it in the big bad world out there. Much better imo is to acknowledge real life, and educate your children about what is acceptable and what isn't! Don't try and wrap them in cotton wool and pretend it doesn't exist, it does, deal with it appropriately.

Erm, isn't that the Watershed is all about ?

Swearing is not acceptable before the watershed but is acceptable, under certain conditions, thereafter .....

Whether you let your young children watch programs with swearing in after the watershed is your business .....

Jack_ 19-12-2011 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omah (Post 4825613)
No ..... the watershed guidelines are there to protect the under 14's, who, nominally, are under the control of a parent or guardian

Still don't understand what that's got to do with my example that chances are that an 18 year old man wouldn't complain.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omah (Post 4825613)
As I said, your reality, not mine ..... we obviously move indifferent social circles with different social standards ..... as for being "stupid", I would suggest that only the "stupid" swear, since they lack the education, the inclination or the imagination to construct expressive and meaningful sentences from the wealth of words that the English Language has to offer ..... :idc:

You know it's funny, I refrained from insulting you on your quite frankly prudish, ignorant views on the basis that I thought you wouldn't sink to such petty levels, how wrong was I?

If I, and people around me choose to swear that doesn't mean we have low social standards, it just means we aren't as uptight as you are about such irrelevant issues. There are many excuses for swearing (not that anybody needs excuses for saying a word anyway), one of them being when you've hurt yourself or you're annoyed, going by what you're saying if someone fell over in the street, snapped their leg in half and blood was shooting everywhere and they shouted '******!' you'd look down upon them with disgust and disregard them because they have 'low social standards'. It's such a pathetic stance to take upon such a silly issue.

And no, swearing doesn't mean you lack a wide vocabulary either, that's another overused, ignorant cliche. Stephen Fry swears but he certainly isn't some ill-educated Essex chav.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom (Post 4825628)
Completely get what you're saying but the watershed isnt an immediate time for things to happen, e.g. a graphic sex scene isn't appropriate for 9.01pm just because its after the watershed. I've got no problems with the content personally but I do think this is the reason why BB is more suited to a 10pm slot, the slot it had for years and the slot it had when BB was at its height.

Fair point I suppose, although there are varying degrees of severity. A graphic sex scene compared to a few uses of the word '******' aren't really on the same level. I do agree 10pm works better for BB though, but it still annoys me how '*****' is bleeped out at such a late time, not only in BB but in other shows too.

Omah 19-12-2011 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 4825931)
Still don't understand what that's got to do with my example that chances are that an 18 year old man wouldn't complain.

18 year old "boy", in many cases, but still nominally adult and therefore free to make lifestyle choices, for better or for worse, uninhibited by experience .....

Quote:

You know it's funny, I refrained from insulting you on your quite frankly prudish, ignorant views on the basis that I thought you wouldn't sink to such petty levels, how wrong was I?
Regrettably, you sank to the petty insult level first ..... and you're at it again - ...... :nono:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 4825931)
.....
more abuse
.....

:idc:

Niall 19-12-2011 10:52 PM

That's just silly. Oh for **** sake. :bored:

Jack_ 19-12-2011 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omah (Post 4825944)
18 year old "boy", in many cases, but still nominally adult and therefore free to make lifestyle choices, for better or for worse, uninhibited by experience .....

I'm sorry but you're really not making any sense. My original point to Niamh was that, although there'd be exceptions to the rule, I expect (as I'm pretty sure most people do) that the large majority of those who complain are either elderly or parents who are concerned about the type of content their children watch, not 18 year old guys. What 13 year olds and younger children have to do with that, I have no idea. The point I made was about who was complaining, not who people were complaining about the protection of.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omah (Post 4825944)
Regrettably, you sank to the petty insult level first ..... and you're at it again - ...... :nono:

I don't recall insulting you once before that post of yours in this thread :conf:

Kerry 19-12-2011 11:13 PM

Keep ontopic please

calyman 19-12-2011 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omah (Post 4825639)
The "watershed" is NOT an immediate concept - it's a flexible one (see the guidelines issued by OFCOM and all the terrestrial TV channels) to allow viewers without the benefit of your unwavering and lightning control of all the TV channels on all the TVs, PCs and media servers in your house to make their own (somewhat slower, maybe impeded) decisions about equipment and programs in their house ..... ;)

Flexibility cuts both ways. For those offended by unwarranted combinations of vowels and consonants, coming up to nine should be the time to prepare yourself to switch off or switch over. Most progs do not finish at 9pm exactly, you can expect your show to finish with a few minutes to spare. So use this flexibility to the best of your pre-watershed ability. There are always killjoys telling the rest of us what we should see, hear and what we should think.

A handful of moaners and complainers should not have undue influence.

Omah 19-12-2011 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calyman (Post 4826074)
Flexibility cuts both ways. For those offended by unwarranted combinations of vowels and consonants, coming up to nine should be the time to prepare yourself to switch off or switch over. Most progs do not finish at 9pm exactly, you can expect your show to finish with a few minutes to spare. So use this flexibility to the best of your pre-watershed ability. There are always killjoys telling the rest of us what we should see, hear and what we should think.

A handful of moaners and complainers should not have undue influence.

OTOH, extremists should not hold sway ..... ;)

calyman 19-12-2011 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omah (Post 4826084)
OTOH, extremists should not hold sway ..... ;)

When you mentioned extremists, I immediately thought of Mary Whitehouse......and of course, others of her ilk. The hypocrisy of faux morality is not for me.

Omah 20-12-2011 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calyman (Post 4826092)
When you mentioned extremists, I immediately thought of Mary Whitehouse......and of course, others of her ilk. The hypocrisy of faux morality is not for me.

Some morality is better than none at all ..... :idc:

MTVN 20-12-2011 03:53 PM

It's odd that it's fine that for Channel 4 to televise full frontal nudity at 8pm yet Ofcom are kicking up a fuss at swearing happening after the watershed

Omah 20-12-2011 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 4826503)
It's odd that it's fine that for Channel 4 to televise full frontal nudity at 8pm yet Ofcom are kicking up a fuss at swearing happening after the watershed

What was the incident of "full frontal nudity at 8pm" ..... ?

MTVN 20-12-2011 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omah (Post 4826505)
What was the incident of "full frontal nudity at 8pm" ..... ?

How to look good naked & Embarrassing Bodies are always allowed to do it

Omah 20-12-2011 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 4826508)
How to look good naked & Embarrassing Bodies are always allowed to do it

OFCOM say :

Quote:

The inclusion of nudity, sexual behaviour, sexual imagery and references to sex should be editorially justified and defensible by the context in which they appear.

Before The Watershed

Nudity in a sexual context is unlikely to be acceptable before the watershed unless strictly limited, whereas nudity in the context of an item about health or education e.g. a beauty treatment or medical examination, is less likely to exceed viewers' expectations, for obvious reasons, although a flagging should be considered.

Full frontal nudity (both male and female), even in a non-sexual context, is unlikely to be acceptable before the watershed, unless there is a serious educational reason for showing it.
Since I've seen neither of the programs you mention, I can't say whether they stick to the guidelines .....

arista 20-12-2011 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 4826503)
It's odd that it's fine that for Channel 4 to televise full frontal nudity at 8pm yet Ofcom are kicking up a fuss at swearing happening after the watershed



Yes Ofcom are Odd

MTVN 20-12-2011 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omah (Post 4826523)
OFCOM say :



Since I've seen neither of the programs you mention, I can't say whether they stick to the guidelines .....

Not that bothered what the official Ofcom stance is, but given that those programs still get aired I'd presume they don't consider it a problem, just pointing out a strange inconsistency in their guidelines

thesheriff443 20-12-2011 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 4826539)
Not that bothered what the official Ofcom stance is, but given that those programs still get aired I'd presume they don't consider it a problem, just pointing out a strange inconsistency in their guidelines

same as there is on this forum!, it all depends if your a jay or aaron fan!

MTVN 20-12-2011 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesheriff443 (Post 4826551)
same as there is on this forum!, it all depends if your a jay or aaron fan!

Well I'm a Mod and a Jay fan while some other Mods are Aaron fans so I'd say not

Omah 20-12-2011 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 4826539)
Not that bothered what the official Ofcom stance is, but given that those programs still get aired I'd presume they don't consider it a problem, just pointing out a strange inconsistency in their guidelines

I see no inconsistency - nudity is not the same as swearing - nudity can be educational or artistic - swearing can be neither

bananarama 27-12-2011 12:50 AM

The raving idiots at Ofcom have generated a broadcasting code that broadcasters have to second guess if or when they are braking it......Ofcom have the intelligence of a rotting rat.

A water shed should be just that clear and defined. It should be the resposibility of parents to ensure a transition time for their children.......But no Ofcom in their usual stupid wisdom creat a set of ifs and buts and what evers for broadcaster to trip over and some moaning half wit that complains to ofcom give the stupid gits the chance to play at being stupid gits......

Ofcom half wits have not yet caught on to the fact of life that young children behind their parents back and some times in front of them swear like bloody troopers.......

The Ofcom silly dick heads are protecting no one from anything........The corruption of the young is already truly embedded in our crazy drug taking knife weilding society.....To late to shut the stable door the horse bolted decades ago.......

Jack_ 27-12-2011 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bananarama (Post 4833660)
The raving idiots at Ofcom have generated a broadcasting code that broadcasters have to second guess if or when they are braking it......Ofcom have the intelligence of a rotting rat.

A water shed should be just that clear and defined. It should be the resposibility of parents to ensure a transition time for their children.......But no Ofcom in their usual stupid wisdom creat a set of ifs and buts and what evers for broadcaster to trip over and some moaning half wit that complains to ofcom give the stupid gits the chance to play at being stupid gits......

Ofcom half wits have not yet caught on to the fact of life that young children behind their parents back and some times in front of them swear like bloody troopers.......

The Ofcom silly dick heads are protecting no one from anything........The corruption of the young is already truly embedded in our crazy drug taking knife weilding society.....To late to shut the stable door the horse bolted decades ago.......

First real case of some sense I've seen in this thread.

Mystic Mock 27-12-2011 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omah (Post 4826561)
I see no inconsistency - nudity is not the same as swearing - nudity can be educational or artistic - swearing can be neither

Nudity is worse for TV as it offers nothing.

thesheriff443 27-12-2011 10:01 AM

its never too late,to learn right from wrong!

Kazakh 27-12-2011 10:31 AM

That Ciaran Ferguson certainly had something to say. Probably too forthright for BB. Stick on a ****** and a 18 year old with NICE HAIR!

Omah 27-12-2011 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bethlehem (Post 4833772)
Nudity is worse for TV as it offers nothing.

.... and swearing offers ?

Pyramid* 27-12-2011 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 4825369)
This is beyond pathetic. There's already a ****ing watershed, what more do they want? It doesn't matter whether it's 11 seconds after or not, they adhered to the 9pm watershed guideline and that's that. I wish they'd stop pandering to the wishes of old women who instead of allowing their children to watch these evidently adult programmes which also include prior warnings of such content (if they're really that dim),should do the right thing and either change the channel or send their children to bed, it really isn't that hard.

Censorship in this country is going too far now and this report is utterly laughable.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christmas Neeve (Post 4825377)
As a mother, I find this very insulting Jack. That article doesn't mention anything about "old women" complaining or anyone else complaining for that matter.

It is very insulting and I suspect, a comment purely designed to be exactly that.



Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 4825383)
Well I'm sorry if it offended you then, but let's be honest the chances are that most people that complain to OFCOM about anything are either elderly people or the mothers (perhaps fathers) I guess who are supposedly 'worried' about the content their children view. I seriously doubt there is a lot of 18 year old men that complain if they hear the word 'sh*t' at 9:01pm on Big Brother.

I know there'll be exceptions to the rule and I'm aware that yes it's most likely a generalisation, but we're all aware that I'm not the only one that thinks this and that's probably for good reason.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 4825392)
The same for me, but that doesn't mean they don't exist. Pretty sure there's been stories in the paper about parents/the elderly complaining :p

Re the complaints: it's after the watershed - so I'm not sure why anyone should have issues either way. If they don't like it - turn it off - the show always comes with a warning.

With regards to all your other comments Jack: it's about time you got rid of this chip off your shoulder you have when it's about anyone who is over the age of 16........ if you were making sexist, homophobic or racist comments: you'd be infracted - but it's fine to make ageist comments right left and centre just because you feel like being a bit contraversial.

You have NO idea of the demographics of those who complain to OFCOM - but I bet there are plenty stuck up younger generations without kids who are quick enough to do it - just because they can - most mothers/fathers of young kids will be too busy working & running their family lives to spend time phoning/writing/emailing OFCOM.

It's about time you grew up a bit - and realised that some of the ones complaining about those reporting to OFCOM - such as yourself - fall into the teenager bracket - and you are in effect: doing the same thing yourself as you are accusing the older generation of doing.

Bit of irony there Jack - given that you are moaning about the older generation moaning. Time you got that chip off your shoulder: the world is a far nice place without having to lug it around. With or without the expletives that you found it necessary to include in your posts.

Mystic Mock 27-12-2011 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omah (Post 4833832)
.... and swearing offers ?

Well sometimes it can be funny if used in the right context imo,but no overall I dont think it adds much either but it certainly adds more to a show and in real life than nudity does,like I wouldnt be seeing strangers naked in real life would I.:joker:

RichardG 27-12-2011 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bethlehem (Post 4833950)
Well sometimes it can be funny if used in the right context imo,but no overall I dont think it adds much either but it certainly adds more to a show and in real life than nudity does,like I wouldnt be seeing strangers naked in real life would I.:joker:

Depends where you go. :evilgrin:

Stu 27-12-2011 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bethlehem (Post 4833772)
Nudity is worse for TV as it offers nothing.

http://userfiles.steadyhealth.com/si...production.jpg

Mystic Mock 27-12-2011 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardG (Post 4834017)
Depends where you go. :evilgrin:

:joker:


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.