No.

The similarity is that she chooses to offend. Not to give helpful criticism.

For someone who claims this on his Twitter account > "Genius is an insult to my intelligence!" it seems you are simply looking for arguments.

Last night you were saying that Lauren had contact with a member of her family, there was no evidence last night. I said that my speculation was safe, because there was evidence of my speculation. Today there is evidence that Lauren spoke to her mom, I now go with that safe evidence. That is how science works. It is the correct way to do things. That is intelligence.

There was no intention of offending Lauren. She said she has a boyish figure because she is too thin and that if she gained some weight she would be more curvy, to which Lauren agreed. She (Carol) then went on to say (as I have already said) that she too has a boyish figure.

So there is no similarity and besides Sophie does have a trout pout and Lauren does have a boyish figure.

You're baiting but I'm not biting.

We can all insult people with honesty, it is no excuse.

More speculation with no facts.

So you agree that Carol did not mean it as a deliberate insult then.

Well done!

Deliberate yes, but honest yes. Why do people have to change what I say?

I actually think Lauren has quite a feminine figure, she has a small waist and she looked good in the dress she wore when she went in the house. I think for a transgendered person she is quite fortunate. I think if it wasn't for her height and very odd appearance she could go unnoticed.

I think what Carol said was pretty rude, I'm all for honesty but a unsolicited comment on someone's appearance really isn't necessary

what do you mean filtering my comments? Like I said earlier, I would never have said that in the first place because I could see how it may offend and I'm the sort of person who doesn't like to upset people, I think of others feelings before I speak. I just don't think the comment was necessary.

I agree.