ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB15 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=647)
-   -   The only twist that would shock the nation and the house would be (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=249616)

Josy 13-05-2014 07:38 PM
Horrible Idea IMO. And definitely one that would put me off watching after all these years.

The public are what keep this show going, they have so much interest because they are allowed an input, watch to form opinions on the hm's and then enjoy getting the chance to get rid of the ones they class to be arseholes, not to mention the money that's generated through the votes..

Also this is not the US and I don't want our BB to be anything like that one, if I did I would watch the US one.

armand.kay 13-05-2014 07:39 PM
The us format is flawless because the final is hardly ever boring even though the public don't vote.

Marsh. 13-05-2014 07:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willbrick1999 (Post 6844821)
I think A big twist, that would blow the nation, would be to have a young housemate, like 15 or 16. Im 15 and would definitely go on. I think it would be great if the housemates voted out each other.
No, there are valid reasons the underage can't go in.

Teen Big Brother being one of the obvious. :yuk:

Niamh. 13-05-2014 07:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 6826193)
That would just cause the public to have less interest if anything
I agree, losing control over the "baddies" would just annoy people

reece(: 13-05-2014 09:13 PM
The public cannot be trusted, ditch their vote

daniel-lewis-1985 14-05-2014 01:32 PM
The public **** up every year. You have to admit the public almost allways kick out the entertainment and almost allways vote for the bore to win.

Take the control out of their hands and make them learn their lesson for abusing their power to vote all these years lol.

Scream 14-05-2014 02:02 PM
they just need to STICK to three people up in a vote to save and not make silly mistakes like letting the public vote on week 1 who should be up for eviction and then be evicted... (Sallie, Gina, Dexter!?!)

It seems really crap...I also would expect people to be less argumentative with each other because they'll get votes against them and be off. It seems weird.

Apple202 14-05-2014 02:06 PM
no imagine if this was BB13 Conor would have won

Marsh. 14-05-2014 02:07 PM
I enjoy people like Sallie getting booted first.

They are not entertaining. They take over the show with their attention seeking, selfish antics.

daniel-lewis-1985 14-05-2014 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 08marsh (Post 6845754)
I enjoy people like Sallie getting booted first.

They are not entertaining. They take over the show with their attention seeking, selfish antics.
Yes because Sam was far more entertaining than Sallie.

I have no words lol.

Marsh. 14-05-2014 02:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985 (Post 6845775)
Yes because Sam was far more entertaining than Sallie.

I have no words lol.
Where did I say that in my post?

Oh yes, I didn't. :idc:

Doogle 14-05-2014 02:51 PM
This would be such a good idea but the public wouldn't like it sadly

I'd be so here for it though, it'd be even more explosive. They would have NO idea if they were liked

daniel-lewis-1985 14-05-2014 03:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 08marsh (Post 6845778)
Where did I say that in my post?

Oh yes, I didn't. :idc:
You said you enjoyed when people like Sallie are evicted first.

That would mean you would prefer a character like Sam to stay would it not?

If Sallie and Sam were up for the chop and you had to evict one odds on you would evict Sallie.

Marsh. 14-05-2014 04:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985 (Post 6845876)
You said you enjoyed when people like Sallie are evicted first.

That would mean you would prefer a character like Sam to stay would it not?

If Sallie and Sam were up for the chop and you had to evict one odds on you would evict Sallie.
I didn't even mention Sam so this is all assumption. For the record, no I didn't like him. But at the same time, in week 1 we didn't get a chance to see anyone else other than Sallie and Gina.

Getting rid of Sallie who only has the argumentative "are the cameras on me?" streak in her was great in my view and we had a chance to watch some of the others interact.

If you found her act entertaining then great, but I didn't. After 15 years, her act is old and tired.

Mystic Mock 14-05-2014 04:45 PM
Well after watching BBUSA6 the entertainers definitely stand more of a chance of lasting longer with this twist than without it.

Mystic Mock 14-05-2014 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 6826170)
The US/CAN live feeds aren't all noms/votes talk though, yes there's a lot of it (and it's very interesting) but there is still downtime where they just chat usual stuff. The main show is mainly strategy stuff yes but there are still little bits that focus around relationships/friendships

I don't think that format would work if they couldn't discuss things

I mean they could always adopt a Survivor-esque format and just do a weekly immunity comp and then have every housemate cast a vote live on eviction night and then if there's a tie give the immunity holder the deciding vote. I'd prefer the US format but at least that'd be a bit more creative
That BB is a disgrace with all the twists they did to guide Jeda to the top 3.

Trust me if you hate showmances like I do avoid BBCAN as the producers aid them into the top 3.

Mystic Mock 14-05-2014 04:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 6826291)
Not really. BB14 had a mix of entertainment and bores in the final, the public vote keeps it balanced.
The only one in that BB14 final that was still entertaining was Gina, Dexter was a shadow of his former self, and the other three aren't even worth mentioning.

Marsh. 14-05-2014 04:56 PM
Gina was boring by the end. Her snotty attitude act had worn very thin by the final.

Mystic Mock 14-05-2014 05:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 08marsh (Post 6845998)
Gina was boring by the end. Her snotty attitude act had worn very thin by the final.
I still liked Gina, the others in the final did not deserve to beat her at all and the fact that two of them did is really bad imo and shows that the public need to either learn from their mistakes or completely have their vote took away from them as they kill every Big Brother off by the time you get to week 8.

Marsh. 14-05-2014 05:17 PM
I don't really care who wins.

I can understand people wanting their favourites to be there until the end, or the entertaining ones to be there throughout the series.

But as for who actually takes the prize money home makes no difference to me. If I enjoyed the series, those last 5 minutes of someone winning isn't going to change the previous 3 months.

daniel-lewis-1985 14-05-2014 05:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Mockinator (Post 6846005)
I still liked Gina, the others in the final did not deserve to beat her at all and the fact that two of them did is really bad imo and shows that the public need to either learn from their mistakes or completely have their vote took away from them as they kill every Big Brother off by the time you get to week 8.
100% agree.

Josy 14-05-2014 06:42 PM
I would agree with Marsh and no it doesn't mean I like boring people to stay but constantly overly bitchy annoying people are HELLISH to watch and it all comes down to the same old argument, not everyone finds the same personalities or things entertaining.

Mystic Mock 14-05-2014 06:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 08marsh (Post 6846038)
I don't really care who wins.

I can understand people wanting their favourites to be there until the end, or the entertaining ones to be there throughout the series.

But as for who actually takes the prize money home makes no difference to me. If I enjoyed the series, those last 5 minutes of someone winning isn't going to change the previous 3 months.
But if you've watched a BB for 3 months wouldn't you want it to go to someone that actually did stuff? I know not to expect my favourites to always win but I would like someone that did stuff to come out as the winner and I don't get the public when they give the win to Housemates that have hardly featured in the series like your Rachel Rice's and Sam Evans.

waterhog 14-05-2014 06:52 PM
i think this is a brill idea.

daniel-lewis-1985 14-05-2014 06:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Mockinator (Post 6846192)
But if you've watched a BB for 3 months wouldn't you want it to go to someone that actually did stuff? I know not to expect my favourites to always win but I would like someone that did stuff to come out as the winner and I don't get the public when they give the win to Housemates that have hardly featured in the series like your Rachel Rice's and Sam Evans.
The reason I vote on finale night is literally for the person who has entertained me all summer kind of a thank you lol.

Mystic Mock 14-05-2014 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985 (Post 6846235)
The reason I vote on finale night is literally for the person who has entertained me all summer kind of a thank you lol.
Exactly, I know we all can't agree on who's the most entertaining but someone entertaining should win imo and I will never understand a lot of the winners that we have had on Big Brother over the years.

Marsh. 14-05-2014 06:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Mockinator (Post 6846192)
But if you've watched a BB for 3 months wouldn't you want it to go to someone that actually did stuff? I know not to expect my favourites to always win but I would like someone that did stuff to come out as the winner and I don't get the public when they give the win to Housemates that have hardly featured in the series like your Rachel Rice's and Sam Evans.
Not really because a) It's not my money they're getting :laugh: and b) It makes no difference to the series.

The winner gets the last 30 seconds of the series with a few fireworks (or sparklers nowadays).

The eventual winner just means nothing to me. I can pick someone I'd like to win if it was my choice, but it's not something that bothers me whatsoever.

Like with Anthony in BB6 wouldn't have been my preference as the winner but it doesn't change that series one iota for me, it was still brilliant from start to finish.

Samm 14-05-2014 06:56 PM
Why does every thread about BB15 turn into a BB14 discussion

Marsh. 14-05-2014 06:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam <3 (Post 6846245)
Why does every thread about BB15 turn into a BB14 discussion
Well it's kind of a general discussion about winners/evictions not confined to BB14.

And it's all we have to discuss unless you have some news?

Mystic Mock 14-05-2014 07:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 08marsh (Post 6846244)
Not really because a) It's not my money they're getting :laugh: and b) It makes no difference to the series.

The winner gets the last 30 seconds of the series with a few fireworks (or sparklers nowadays).

The eventual winner just means nothing to me. I can pick someone I'd like to win if it was my choice, but it's not something that bothers me whatsoever.

Like with Anthony in BB6 wouldn't have been my preference as the winner but it doesn't change that series one iota for me, it was still brilliant from start to finish.
I loved BB6 as well but it still has that tainted feeling because none of the big guns won.

Saph 14-05-2014 07:05 PM
I like the idea of the public not voting, however I dont like the idea of the HMs choosing who goes

Mystic Mock 14-05-2014 07:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saph (Post 6846268)
I like the idea of the public not voting, however I dont like the idea of the HMs choosing who goes
Then the other idea could be that you have two tasks to finish, say you have 16 Housemates the top 13 go through to next week on the first task, and for task 2 the one that does the worst gets evicted.

What do people think of this idea? Could it work?

daniel-lewis-1985 14-05-2014 07:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Mockinator (Post 6846295)
Then the other idea could be that you have two tasks to finish, say you have 16 Housemates the top 13 go through to next week on the first task, and for task 2 the one that does the worst gets evicted.

What do people think of this idea? Could it work?
Defo, the bottom 2 should be made to fight for their survival if the other housemates or the public aren't going to choose who leaves.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:06 AM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.