OK Fella
you are now free from this
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/...37_964x523.jpg

It would certainly be an interesting system if either the accused or accuser went to jail :laugh:

The woman would need to have been held in contempt of court if her testimony was deemed to be full of falsehood. Clearly that was not the case here.

I do like the system where there are 3 possible outcomes; Innocent, Guilty and not proven, but unfortunately not proven has now been associated with got off with it, so from a who sues who perspective, the clear either or choice is the only system that currently works.

Remember what paul gambaccini said about the flypaper trap, him and jim davidson both said in there books, and it exposed what the police and the media where doing, because they are all sitting in the same room, everyone of those guys have been hounded, persecuted, and called everything, and I mean everything, the police have wasted public money, for a PR machine, their seems to be a culture of compensation, these days, because people will do anything for money, and even go this low for it, these guys have now had their lives ruined, and put through hell, because the police put up a website that says, have you been tapped on the bottom, or hugged by a celebrity, years ago, then we will believe you, and we will take him to court, the british public have this sick perversion in them to hear what the media tells them, I believe dj fox is a victim of the flypaper trap, these drumhead trials must stop, calum best was nearly thrown into the flytrap by a money grabber, who wanted more than just a few notes spread on the bed, I believe the future for celebs, is that their agents and PR teams will tell them not to hug or kiss, their fans, or put their arms around them for a photo, because it will lead to a false accusation, being made, and their is the price of a loony world we live in today,

but even if that was the case, ACTUALLY raping someone is still a million times worse than lying about someone raping you.

I don't like how some people seem to be implying that being accused of rape is just as bad as actually BEING raped. because it;s not. it's not even in the same universe.

The two aren't comparable but one thing they do have in common is they can both ruin a persons life

well done Foxy

Foxy now for Strictly Come Dancing. Obviously the foxtrot.

he doesn't look well....lets hope he sues these lying scumbags for a fortune

From what I heard in the news, there where alot of female obsessed fans who where a bit nutty, they camped outside the studio, even followed him home, and yes stalked him, it raises questions about why this was brought to court, some of them seem madly in love with him, but he rejected them, I think some of them need professional help,

And the men who stalked him too.

trouble is that wastes even more millions of tax payers money

Heres a snippet from the long suffering innocent jim Davidson, falsely accused by a pack of gold digging liars who got off unnamed unashamed and unimprisoned...jim lost 100s of thousands of pounds, 2 years of his career, reputation in tatters life destroyed


"It was once that in merry old England you got a fair trial. Not any more. In their rush to increase the conviction rate, the government of the day, with David (himself the subject of sex scandal) Blunkett as the Justice Minister, decided to breach Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, by taking away the presumption of innocence. This was achieved in subtle fashion by taking away the warning to Juries, "about the dangers of convicting a person on the unsupported say so of of a claimant." Thus, any person making a gold-digging [false] claim of abuse, will be believed, because the trial judge has not told them differently. After that little ruse and other amendments in the Sexual Offences Act 2003, the conviction rate soared - filling our prisons with many innocent men in the process. Did you say "prats?", If you did, we tend to agree. So come on all you claimants, why not accuse a politician of giving you one up the rear? Give them a taste of their own medicine. There is no need for proof and it won't matter if when they inspect your anal passage that they find no evidence of trauma - believe us, that will be put down to some incredible healing power. Bull****! But that is what is happening out there today. It's true."



When it come to historical allegations, there is almost no chance of mounting a defence. Any witnesses to provide an alibi will long since have forgotten about dates and times. Your own diaries will have been thrown away and other information such as telephone bills, etc, will be long gone.

are you saying that if a girl loves a boy she can't be raped by the boy she loved? do you know that the vast majority of rapes happen from a man that a girl trusts?

mot rapes hoopoe between a woman and a man that she trusts. most rapes happen from a husband raping his wife or a boyfriend raping his girlfriend.

people still have this silly idea that rapes happen in dark parking lots, or back alleys, but it's not true. a woman is most likely to be raped in her own bed by someone she trusts.

so what if they were stupid and naive, do stupid and naive people deserve to be raped?

this man is a celebrity, and many women felt like they could trust him, or like they knew him, the way we all feel like we know celebrities.

even jimmy tarbuck, got the trick treatment, a woman said that he and his road managers, sexually assaulted her in his dressing room on top of the pops, in london, in 1963, but most people will know, that TOTP, started in 1964, and the studio was in the city of manchester, for three years, and tarbuck never appeared on the show, this was backed up by records and people who worked on the show, this person got the city, year, studio address, wrong, and the police failed to catch on, for nearly 12 months, jim davidson like tarbuck, and others, got police raids at 5am in the morning, with 14 officers and yes, the media standing near their homes, then the mock trial begains, with computers, and other things taken away, in plastic boxes, the police say that they can't crack down on crime, but they seem to have the manpower to do a PR maneuver to do this for along time.