Ill bet they insist an having a slice of the cake though, bitches.

How dare they have a right to say they don't want their own eggs going in a cake? :umm2:

Fair enough they did go a little over to the top towards Joel and maybe they should have been a little more civil about the situation.

I'd be the same as them though I'd rather have boiled fried or scrambled eggs rather than having them put in a cake. There's nothing wrong with what they did.

sad part they both live with each other n probably wont even have separate lives smh

Finally another voice of reason in this thread :clap1:

They're on rations. They can't use all those kinds of ingredients on luxuries like cake.

Hey fatty bum bum will have to make do with carrots.

The twins just came and took their own ration, and they also took Eileen's ration who must have also wanted to keep her 1 or 2 eggs aswell. I remember them saying "and 2 for Eileen" but don't see many complaining about Eileen wanting to keep her eggs.

I didn't think they took eggs belonging to Joel and the others. And someone said the boys still made a cake anyways with the remaining eggs so they must not have even needed to waste the twins and Eileen's eggs.

If the boys haven't eaten any eggs so far in the house, then so long as nobody was stealing their portion then it's not exactly the twin's fault if the boys chose to not eat their own portion of eggs previously.

Everybody seems very hungry, food is low, I can see why the twins wanted to keep their 2 wee eggs for breakfast/lunch if it's one of the few foods they look forward to and had no interest in cake. :shrug:

They were in the right :clap1: