Why cant we all debate politely anymore :chloecry:

Austin had the most valid points in the argument so he won the row.

Chloe just attention seeked as usual, she's spent 18 days in the house and was fine with it so why start complaining now?

People going against Austin just because he lost his temper is not looking about how you are suppose to win an argument which is about who has the most valid points which was Austin.

And what was Bobby doing patronising him?

Why cant we all debate politely anymore :chloecry:.

spill it mock

As much as i can't stand her at all.Why the **** should she go and toast his dead brother if she does'nt want to?It's not compulsory.

Because Austin said so, duh!

When everyone else makes the effort to pay their respects obviously it looks bad on her

With the greatest of respect we see 45 mins a day and I can't recall her ever being around alcohol for prolonged times and she is entitled and bound to have down days, my mum is an ex smoker and she would be ok with it one day but if she was craving she could not be near a cigarette.

I didn't hear him make any valid points, I also felt it was low of him to mention his dead brother to shame her. Remember his reaction was to her carrying 2 unopened cans to Stevi and Bobby...was his reaction really appropriate?

He went a bit ott, but I think he made valid points.

Bobby gets involved in everything. He's annoying me. I can't stand people who always try to be funny. I was even Team Jenna and Farrah the other day when they were arguing with him.

Not at all, he was 100% in the right during every point of the argument.

Should she have stolen the cans? No, if she wanted take the alcohol for them, why didn't she ask instead of just running off with them in a sneaky way?

Austin was correct in saying that she's been around alcohol every day in the house and she hasn't seemed to have an issue with it before. Plus, Big Brother wouldn't let a real alcoholic into the house to begin with, so she's lying.

She should have come outside to toast to Austin's brother with everyone else, why is she letting Janice tell her what to do as if she's her mother or something? Or at least spoken to Austin about it, but seemingly she didn't which looked extremely disrespectful.

She then continued to cry and play the victim. A typical day in the life of Chloe. :sleep:

This.

Those valid points were, Mock?

I'm trying to understand your point of view :)

Asking would have been the best thing to do instead of stealing which can be seen as being sneaky and i don't think she's an alcoholic at all, i love her but i think that's a lie...Big Brother would not let her drink if that was the case.

Valid points have been made over 3 pages. If you're gonna dismiss all of those Mock may as well not waste his time.

She did ask. Rewatch.

Michelle on BOTS speaking sense. I think I like her now.

Let him decide that :pat:

Wait, are we still arguing about this lol

Edit, nm I'm on the wrong thread

Lets be honest this was just another way of Austin making everything about himself...

I'm wondering why Amy made the title a question since she clearly didn't wanna hear both sides :pat:

Well I feel that Chloe was faking it because she craves attention for herself at all times, she's been around Alcohol every day (I know that we don't get to see everything) but Chloe did seem to be okay with it every other day except for tonight for some strange reason.

Did Austin go a little aggressive? Yes, but his always been like that so I don't see why it's so bad now that his doing it to Chloe?

Janice does need to stop treating Chloe as a child to be honest, I think she;s acting like her mother rather than a friend.

:joker:

Everyones been stealing alcohol. Getting 2 people a can each from the stash of booze is hardly stealing.

Big Brother does let alcoholics on, off the top of my head Paula Hamilton, Jim Davidson, Heidi Fleiss and Michael Barrymore.

Chloe is way more attention seeking than Austin will ever be if we're bringing that card into it.

Yep

If that's the case, it worked. Saving the show!

I know and it's not okay when any of them do it, not just Chloe. Natasha I've noticed in particular doing it numerous times. She could've at least checked people were okay with it first instead of just running off with them. Even she looked like she had something to hide. :joker:

Paula Hamilton and Heidi Fleiss were clearly not all there, but they were ex-alcoholics, no?

I didn't think anyone was an attention seeker tbh but claiming to be an alcoholic could be seen as that because i don't think she is, She is around alcohol most of the time and BB would have done something about this because health and safety.

I've never seen her around the heavy drinkers, infact every time there have been clashes over it I don't recall her or Stevi being around.

I don't really understand what her being an attention seeker has to do with it but I'll simply give her the benifit of the doubt and put it this way, IF she has had issues with drink in the past is it not really inappropriate for Austin to suggest she join the group or shes effectivly heartless, I'd say thats quite dangerous to try and force somebody who has issues to confront their demons for his selfishness.

I still fail to see what points her made that were winning ones either. Sorry.

[2]

BB do nothing. Michael Barrymore was a recovering alcoholic when he went in and they gave the house booze every night. I recently watched the series so I am quite confident in saying as such.

Sophie Anderton is another recovering alcoholic they allowed in with no health and safety precautions.

I'm guessing that's a good thing Makosi stans?

Me at some of these opinions

http://cdn.thisisbigbrother.com/cust...r77153_106.gif

Ex alcoholic implies that you've been cured when in reality you're always in recovery.

Contribute something better then.

I'm bored of the same old debates going round and round and ending in something un BB related.

But this whole thread is an Austin debate, anyone bored by it has no obligation to post tbh.