![]() |
Quote:
https://uploadir.com/u/w9e2z1n7 |
She means the US format right?
We've already got the Canadians scripted elements and their Showmances. |
No thx
|
As long as this show is on Channel 5 and produced by the people it is, it is beyond recovery.
|
Quote:
How is that good voting?:conf: |
Marco contributed nothing though?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Is there any reason a brand new show couldn't take the BBCan format, but not be called Big Brother?
|
Quote:
Emma and Charlie have given me nothing to want to discuss about them other than what are they still doing there when the public could've just simply voted them off? Don't get me wrong Marco nor Natalie should've won, but they shouldn't have been the first two that the public voted off. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I doubt he could even spell it. :smug: |
Quote:
|
They can keep it.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Everyone knows the higher the volume, tHE BETTER THE HOUSEMATE!!!!! |
Quote:
All contributing to one of the worst series of BB ever aired. |
Quote:
It's like watching Game Of Thrones and wanting the Lannister's off the screen before the story calls for it just because they're not "nice" but they're sure as hell more entertaining than a lot of the other characters on the show and it would be duller if they went before the show ended. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also, the people in Big Brother are real people. Comparing it to enjoying evil characters in a show about dragons isn't really relevant. :hee: |
Quote:
Housemates like Emma I cannot stand as there's nothing to discuss about her other than she's "nice" which on BB translates as doesn't speak or argue. If we had more Housemates like Emma and Charlie instead of the Marco's and Natalie's then there wouldn't be a TIBB, and there certainly wouldn't be anything to discuss. As I've said as long as Marco and Natalie didn't win the show but last a certain distance then they don't offend me. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ok. We will end the discussion there. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And I've honestly never heard Charlie tell a joke have you? If so I must've missed it.:joker: She's like a poor man's Lea from BB7. |
Quote:
Charlie was in your list of housemates who would offer nothing to discuss? Blatantly not true, she's one of the higher profile housemates in terms of discussion this series. And it doesn't matter what topics are made as long as they are? Again, load of rubbish. We could have the forum filled with discussion on similar pancake related drama and it wouldn't in anyway, shape or form be a good thing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You honestly think that having a show full of Emma's that give out nothing is better than having threads at all? Even if it's about Pancakes or whatever other mundane thing that you can think of? Pancake arguments remind me of the Ch4 days actually so I kind of like it. And Charlie's high profile is the same as Jason's, a Showmance, yes admittedly it does give out more discussion on the Forums which gives her more of a pass than Emma because she's also behaving like a Bunny Boiler in the whole affair, but that's one thing. |
Quote:
Can't say I did. |
Quote:
Apart from being a twat obsessed with poorly re-enacting scenes from pornhub, what did Marco offer? |
Quote:
But yeah being scripted a blatant Showmance does give her slightly less credit than someone that had that, and behaved like a deluded twat, argued on Georgina and saw right through her, did have discussions on how hyper he was, and how aggressive he could be towards other people in arguments, and how annoying that he could be. Charlie it's just her thing with Jason in the house, and that she likes kicking Dogs, oooh what a character. |
Quote:
In fact the only time that I can think of it was Conor in BB13. |
Quote:
Also, Charlie being a hateful bitch = great housemate according to your criteria. :smug: |
Quote:
Emma and Alex are taking that title as they offer zero to the show, and ironically will probably be the final two despite being so dull. |
But yeah I think even most Marco detractors wouldn't say that he had no personality whatsoever, otherwise there wouldn't have been people disliking him so badly like he was the male Helen Wood otherwise.
|
Quote:
I just think that if you're trying to use an objective approach to determine who The Best Housemates are, you're making an assumption that all contributions and entertainment are equal and it just matters that you're doing something rather than considering what you're actually doing. If that's the case, you can just count sentences in each episode and whoever speaks the most is The Best Housemate. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.