do you advocate terminating the lives of all disabled people you deem to not have a great quality of life? thats what I love about the left, they dont believe in God so they decide to play God themselves in matters of life and death and who they say deserves a chance to live. innocent disabled babies dont usually make the cut

What is happening now is playing God. If all medical intervention was removed and charlie was left to the will of god and nature he would die. He is only currently breathing because a machine is doing it. If they allow him to be kept alive the chances are he will never communicate and so will never be able to indicate if he is in pain or not. The parents have the worlds sympathy and I wouldn't wish what they are living though on my worst enemy but in my opinion they are fighting this more for their sakes than Charlie's as quite understandably they don't want to lose him

The fact is you can keep pretty much anyone alive indefinitely with life support. You can keep a heart pumping and lungs inflating even with the brain being completely dead. So you're going into really complex morality if you say that turning off life support in someone who will never recover enough to be OFF of life support, is "killing them". Hospitals would be full of hundreds of thousands of people attached to machines for years after death?

That's got nothing to do with anything I have said but okay?

Today
they were outside the Hospital
Parents saying his
brain damage is not so bad
and the new USA oral
treatment can improve that
this is why they have 360,000 signatures
for the child to go for treatment in USA.


http://news.sky.com/story/charlie-ga...tment-10942716

http://e3.365dm.com/17/07/1096x616/8...20170709143141