ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Explicit art in public - allowed or not? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=337417)

user104658 15-04-2018 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maru (Post 9959827)
It's a penis, not the American flag [emoji23]

Potayto potahto... :laugh2:

waterhog 15-04-2018 07:13 PM

art has to push barriers and provoke a reaction to keep it interesting. this examples are not to my taste but I still feel the artist has the right to do them as he or she may have a reason to why they are doing this.

Kizzy 15-04-2018 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twosugars (Post 9959803)
More "vaginas". There's this in Rzeszow, Poland. It's a communist era 2 world war memorial. The locals call it affectionately Big C*unt.
It's not meant to be erotic, the labia shaped concrete is just unfortunate background to the memorial sculpture in the middle of it.
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...pictureid=3574

We have a national monument who is a massive **** too, except his actual title is 'Foreign Secretary' :hee:

Kizzy 15-04-2018 08:17 PM

Wasn't there a suggestion that great works like the 'Venus De Milo' and 'David' were too lewd?

Brillopad 15-04-2018 08:26 PM

Oh how men love to talk about their bits! :bored: It never ceases to amaze me how the mere mention of a willy adds a bundle of non-sensical and pointless posts to a thread.

Twosugars 15-04-2018 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 9960365)
Wasn't there a suggestion that great works like the 'Venus De Milo' and 'David' were too lewd?

True. Here is some examples I found re. David

Quote:

When the 5.17 meter tall David (called Il Gigante) of Michelangelo was installed in the Piazza della Signoria in Florence in 1504, authorities immediately placed a garland called a ghirlanda made of twenty-eight copper leaves around his waist in order to cover his nakedness.
Quote:

In 1857, when British queen Victoria first saw the six-meter-tall replica of Michelangelo's statue David in the Victoria and Albert Museum, London, she was shocked by the sight of his genitals. A detachable fig leaf was immediately commissioned and kept handy for future royal visits.
most worringly this controversy in Russia happened in 2016!
Quote:

Residents in St. Petersburg, Russia, will vote on whether or not to censor a 16-foot-tall plastic copy of Michelangelo‘s David, which has become the source of controversy in the city in recent days.
It now stands in front of St. Ann’s Lutheran church as part of the exhibition, “Michelangelo: The Creation of the World,” which also includes animated recreations of the Renaissance master’s Sistine Chapel frescoes, as well as works by Leonardo da Vinci and Raphael to Giotto, Sandro Botticelli, and Titian, according to the exhibition press release.
“How could you put this bloke without any trousers on in the center of St Petersburg, next to a school and a church?” wrote a local women in a letter about the 16-foot statue, quoted by Lenta and translated the by the BBC. “This giant spoils the city’s historic appearance and warps children’s souls.”
“Children are around, looking at this giant nude man. Is that normal?” she added. Although local school director Maksim Pratusevich reportedly insisted his students were “sufficiently cultured and educated” to deal with a little artistic nudity, the matter will still be put to a vote.

montblanc 15-04-2018 09:26 PM

allowed

Twosugars 15-04-2018 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maru (Post 9959818)
My thought is, if these etchings are meant to stretch open our minds beyond the pornographic/dirty interpretations of these images... I don't think the urban setting facilitates that message all that conveniently. A lot of graffiti in the US are penises, vaginas, etc (I love graffiti)... though in places like downtown here or in Baltimore, you see people put up airbrush of "cool" or "metro art", cute little monsters, etc. It's a way to transform the city to something less depressing. Here they make "eco art" with manmade materials, like scrap metal, old stone, unique landscaping, random rock gardens/koi ponds etc.. that kind of changes the common narrative of urban settings being a dirty/sterile/static place to a setting that feels more organic, full of life, more keen to project a more naturalized philosophy of urban life...

Propping up a penis in the middle of a city on it's own wouldn't do much to change the narrative around sexual symbols in those settings. On the other hand (pun unintended), if it included other references to natural science and brought in a bit more "warmth", then I could see some interesting reinterpretations of that...

The best example I can think of off the top of my head is the art car parade here during the Gay Pride parade. I've seen some crazy reconstructive nudes riding in the back of those... :laugh:

We also have a local festival called Mardis Gras, which is family friendly in the beginning, but after the parade, women and men start flashing and start giving away the beads... you can buy plastic penises/vagina necklaces during that, even during the family friendly portion but lots of families still take their children... which I guess would be a shock to some there?



Just as a quick example of those crazy Asians...


:laugh:
Thank you for that, Maru.
I see your point about putting some of these things in bigger context and making them about something more than just profanity.

Twosugars 15-04-2018 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9960380)
Oh how men love to talk about their bits! :bored: It never ceases to amaze me how the mere mention of a willy adds a bundle of non-sensical and pointless posts to a thread.

Aw, sorry the thread is not to your taste, Brillo.
But, I hope you agree, since it is displayed in such prominent locations in some major cities, it deserves to be discussed. We are not giggling here over some graffito genitals in the dark corner of a seedy street.
And you are too hard on the contributions to this discussion. All the post so far made sense and had a point.
Do you see any merit in explicit art in public spaces or such art existing at all?

Marsh. 15-04-2018 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 9958832)
I don't want to explain to my children what the pervy art is ,no theres a time and place for everything

Aren't your children grown adults?

I'm sure they know what a penis looks like.

Smithy 15-04-2018 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 9960527)
Aren't your children grown adults?

I'm sure they know what a penis looks like.

:joker::joker::joker:

Brillopad 15-04-2018 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twosugars (Post 9960525)
Aw, sorry the thread is not to your taste, Brillo.
But, I hope you agree, since it is displayed in such prominent locations in some major cities, it deserves to be discussed. We are not giggling here over some graffito genitals in the dark corner of a seedy street.
And you are too hard on the contributions to this discussion. All the post so far made sense and had a point.
Do you see any merit in explicit art in public spaces or such art existing at all?

Sorry I wasn’t really talking about this thread but the nonsense that was going on in another thread - that has now disappeared, although I stand by my comments on how obsessed many men seem to me with their bits. :hehe:

Twosugars 15-04-2018 09:51 PM

It seems to me that there's nothing vulgar or filthy about our external reproductive organs, after all, thanks to them our species survive. They should be depicted and even celebrated as symbols of good things like fertility etc.
I'd blame our Judeo-Christian religions, or even wider, Abrahamic religions (judaism, christianity, islam). Starting with Adam and Eve story when they were happily frolicking naked in the garden of Eden until their sinned (snake and apple stuff) and god cursed them with feeling shame among other things. So they started covering up.
Since then religion has made us view genitals and sex as something unclean.
As Maru illustrated, the Far East has different view of things. Also, African tribes etc had no problem with nudity until missionaries arrived.

Twosugars 15-04-2018 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9960542)
Sorry I wasn’t really talking about this thread but the nonsense that was going on in another thread - that has now disappeared, although I stand by my comments on how obsessed many men seem to me with their bits. :hehe:

:hee: Ok. Yeah, the other thread disappeared when I was reading it so never got to know how it all ended.

Re. men and their bits, yes, we are. It's at the centre of our gender identity. What about women? How do you see the importance of your bits?
I know that women can go through tough time when losing breasts to mastectomy, feel they may be seen as less of a woman. But how important your bits are on day to day basis?

Brillopad 15-04-2018 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twosugars (Post 9960550)
:hee: Ok. Yeah, the other thread disappeared when I was reading it so never got to know how it all ended.

Re. men and their bits, yes, we are. It's at the centre of our gender identity. What about women? How do you see the importance of your bits?
I know that women can go through tough time when losing breasts to mastectomy, feel they may be seen as less of a woman. But how important your bits are on day to day basis?

I guess as important as you want them to be. Too many obsess on their bits, often based on insecurity in my opinion - for example too many young attractive women risk their health for bigger boobs when most look great as they are and men do nothing but talk about the size of their bits. I find the reasons behind why so many obsess more about one part of their body more interesting.

Kizzy 15-04-2018 10:14 PM

I blame Freud!

Maru 16-04-2018 02:35 AM

In my experience, women do tend to talk a lot more about their own body (especially health and hygeine) more-so than the men, with fewer boundaries... but that may be a cultural thing here in the US.

I wouldn't say that is necessarily compensation when a woman does it. I think it's pretty natural to be fascinated with our own human form and other bodily functions. Children are the same way, and I think that's a lot of how they work out their early insecurities about their body (from puberty, etc) and graduate to a more self-confident view of their own bodies ...

So essentially we start from a very infantile perspective towards the physical early on and it takes a number of years (and perhaps some extroversion) to chip away any insecurities that come up from the major physical/emotional/mental changes during early adult years/development... so when an adult can talk about their body, can joke about it... that's possibly a good sign they've developed a positive relationship with their own body.

I'm quite happy with my own body. I don't really care what people think of me with regard to my attitude towards it, I'm never intentionally 'vulgar'. I'm conservative in many ways (including in dress), but my comfort with my own body and being able to talk about it, all but. I think that when friends have been self-conscious of these topics during conversations in the past, they hear me and realize I wouldn't pick a bone over their wording or insecurity, so it's helped them to be more open about other more sensitive topics (like sexual health) that otherwise would never come up at all...

We also go through a bit of re-conditioning in Studio Art with reference to nudity. I've met some interesting folk in there, people who are quite professional and take that past-time quite seriously. I don't think of them as dirty for coming into an art studio and allowing other folk to view them or draw them. They have burlesque/costume workshops as well where we can draw nudes/live figures if people want experience with dressing the human form in drawings/paintings... some people are quite proud of that craft. I don't think that is childish at all. I think the artistic approach is quite mature and encourages self-composure actually.

Anyway all random thoughts.

Marsh. 16-04-2018 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9960559)
I guess as important as you want them to be. Too many obsess on their bits, often based on insecurity in my opinion - for example too many young attractive women risk their health for bigger boobs when most look great as they are and men do nothing but talk about the size of their bits. I find the reasons behind why so many obsess more about one part of their body more interesting.

You mustn't know very interesting men then.

Twosugars 16-04-2018 10:54 AM

I think that although we like to think of ourselves as rational beings, a lot of our behaviour is driven by primal instincts, e.g. our reproductive behaviour. Each sex tries to impress however they can. In humans, female of the species is more decorative and wears "colourfull plumage". But men are not immune from that either. It's getting more equal on that front lately (men are more body conscious & strive for perfection in their looks - que quest for six pack, steroid use, insecurity, etc).
Sorry to be ellitist, but it seems to me, people with less education or intelligence, tend to follow the crudest ideals of beauty e.g. some women trying to look like blowup dolls or porn actresses through plastic surgery. I guess in men the equivalent would be also plastic surgery and steroid pumped muscles.
Re. cock size, like it or not, studies and anecdotal evidence shows that, given a choice, women prefer a bigger one.
I'm generalizing for the sake of argument of course. Majority of people avoid these superficial extremes and prefer other, more sophisticated means of wooing a partner or not giving a sh*t (or say they do).


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.