ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   The import of US chlorinated chicken, beef with growth hormones and GM produce (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=354736)

Twosugars 02-03-2019 10:31 PM

Brexiteers are free marketeers, Fox wants zero import tariffs. That'd wipe out British agriculture and manufacturing.
All these factory workers voting for brexit are like turkeys voting for Christmas.
I'd laugh if it wasn't so tragic
People were conned. Nothing was said about that, only immigration.
And non eu immigration is already soaring.
But that's ok according to Gove bc now we have a democratic control. Bollox. UK always had control over non eu immigration. People were expecting reduction in numbers. One big con.

MTVN 02-03-2019 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10463165)
That not the point though, we shouldn't be importing sub standard products after Brexit just to get 'a deal' otherwise the UK is being held hostage to an even worse scenario than we currently have....I thought the whole point of Brexit was that we held our own destiny in our hands, not that you best take this sub standard crap otherwise we aint playing ......the idea that Brexiteers are even on board with this scenario is pretty laughable...looks like a case of well obvs I won’t be eating it but some other mug can have the pleasure

Well Brexit does allow us to accept chlorinated chicken where previously the EU barred it. Whether we want to or not is our own decision but I find it odd that it can excite passions so much when people very rarely look into the background of the food they eat, when they'd probably never known about this aspect of farming before now and when it's not exactly had disastrous effects in the US

Imo this is a completely trivial issue which has become a lightning rod for anti Brexit campaigners

joeysteele 03-03-2019 07:00 AM

It is an issue because as the USA is indicating trade deals with the USA could have some reliance on accepting these meats.

Which our governments have refused to do in line with EU guidelines on the issue.
If we do start breaking down our standards as to any food, just to acquire new trading deals.
What does that really say about us.

It's actually quite an issue, a choice too, however it is an issue relating to possible welfare of those pro or anti brexit who eat these types of meat.

No one has made much noise of even wanting USA imports of these meats before.
Being content with the standards we already have and not liking much the USA standards at all.
So is clearly an issue, for all meat eaters.

MTVN 03-03-2019 08:09 AM

Yes but people act as if we'd be adopting some barbaric practice which will be disastrous for our food quality which is all just hyperbole. The US would strongly disagree with the EU that it lowers food standards so its within our gift to approach the issue independently and make our own decision now rather than being bound by what the EU had decided. If you actually read what the US ambassador said its quite reasonable:

Quote:

This week the United States published our objectives for a future trade deal with the UK. We are now ready to negotiate the most ambitious and comprehensive trade deal in the history of our special relationship. And of course we want agriculture to be part of those negotiations – it is a great opportunity for both of us.

You have been presented with a false choice: either stick to EU directives, or find yourselves flooded with American food of the lowest quality. Inflammatory and misleading terms like “chlorinated chicken” and “hormone beef” are deployed to cast American farming in the worst possible light.

It is time the myths are called out for what they really are: a smear campaign from people with their own protectionist agenda. There is a difference between American and European agriculture. It is not a question of quality but philosophy.

The EU approach prizes history and tradition over innovation and science. In the United States, we look at the bigger picture. We have to. We export more food than any other country. We take our responsibility to produce safe, affordable food for the rest of the world incredibly seriously.

We cannot overlook the fact that the world population is expected to reach almost 10 billion by 2050. Global food security is absolutely critical. We have to face up to the full range of health, resource and environmental pressures that come from a growing population. It is not sustainable for the whole world to follow the EU’s “Museum of Agriculture” approach. We have to look to the future of farming, not just the past.

American farmers are using all the scientific and technological tools at their disposal to address the challenges ahead. We have developed crops which are more resistant to drought. We have bred innovative new varieties of fruit and vegetables which can stay fresh and help us combat food waste. We have boosted the ability of our animals to fight devastating diseases. We have developed agricultural tools which radically cut the amount of carbon emissions on our farms.

American farmers are making a vital contribution to the rest of the world. Their efforts deserve to be recognised. Instead, they are being dismissed with misleading scare-stories which only tell you half the story. The reality is, as ever, a lot more nuanced.

Take the case of so-called chlorinated chicken. It is true that we wash our chicken to eliminate harmful pathogens – just as European producers do with their fruit and vegetables.

There is very good reason for doing so. The EU’s own Food Safety Authority has found that doing these washes in the processing plant is the most effective and economical way of dealing with potentially lethal bacteria like salmonella and campylobacter. It is not only safe to wash our chicken like this – it is a public safety no-brainer.

American beef has also been unfairly attacked for decades. The EU claims the moral high ground for its choice not to use growth hormones in cattle production. But again, there are good reasons American farmers choose a different path.

They want to produce meat using fewer resources at a lower cost to both the environment and the consumer. The scientific consensus has been very clear that it remains completely safe to eat meat from animals raised in this way. There is no reason to limit imports of American beef – which is why the World Trade Organisation ruled we were fully within our rights to take action against the EU for not complying with its obligations.

The picture you are being painted of American agriculture bears no resemblance to the reality on the ground. The fact is that farmers in America have the same priorities as farmers in Britain. They pass on their farms from one generation to the next. They care deeply about their land and livestock and they take tremendous pride in the food they produce.

You will find the highest quality food in the world in the United States – from our wild salmon, to our world-beating wines, and beef used in only the finest restaurants. If you want food made to the highest standards of sustainability, animal welfare or organic farming, America can offer all of that.

It is always worth hearing the full story. It would be a genuine missed opportunity to buy into the idea that the EU’s traditionalist approach to agriculture is Britain’s only option for a quality and efficient agriculture sector moving forward. You now have the freedom to make your own choices about the way you farm and fish, the products you import, and the technology you utilise. This is the country that once changed the world with the innovations and revolutions that took place on British farms. You could do the same thing again now and together we could shape the agricultural revolution of the future.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...m-agriculture/

Cherie 03-03-2019 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 10463197)
Well Brexit does allow us to accept chlorinated chicken where previously the EU barred it. Whether we want to or not is our own decision but I find it odd that it can excite passions so much when people very rarely look into the background of the food they eat, when they'd probably never known about this aspect of farming before now and when it's not exactly had disastrous effects in the US

Imo this is a completely trivial issue which has become a lightning rod for anti Brexit campaigners

Well that is certainly a spin on we are in control....

its very patronising to say the British consumer is not conscious of where their food comes from, since the BSE scandal consumers are very keen know where their food comes

Its all very well saying consumers will have a choice of what to buy, but this food will find its way into school dinners, hospitals and care homes where cost is the bottom line

Cherie 03-03-2019 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 10463260)
Yes but people act as if we'd be adopting some barbaric practice which will be disastrous for our food quality which is all just hyperbole. The US would strongly disagree with the EU that it lowers food standards so its within our gift to approach the issue independently and make our own decision now rather than being bound by what the EU had decided. If you actually read what the US ambassador said its quite reasonable:


The Americans saving the environment by pumping their cattle with hormones, wow that's some claim, I assume everyone washes their own vegetables before they eat them? so what they were previously washed in is immaterial? The advice is never to wash chicken before cooking

Kazanne 03-03-2019 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 10462947)
I have done Kazanne.
I've been moving to it since my late teens anyway.

Good for you Joey,you soon get used to it,they have some lovely veggie foods now.

user104658 03-03-2019 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10463272)
The advice is never to wash chicken before cooking

The reason for that, though, is that it invariably leads to "splashback" spreading the bacteria from raw chicken to the sink area / any nearby dishes or cutlery and that's where contamination occurs whereas if chicken is in date and properly cooked through there shouldn't really be any risk of food poisoning. Although a lot of people undercook chicken.

As you know Cherie I'm firmly anti-Brexit but I think this particular issue is a red herring; I have some concerns about American farming METHODS such as overuse of pesticide / use of pesticides banned here but that's an environmental concern. I honestly don't think there's anything at all wrong with the quality of US produced fresh food. The American health crisis (just like our own) is down to what's done with those products afterwards... i.e. their processed foods, which are full of vast quantities of high fructose corn syrup, MSG, hydrogenated fats and other chemical additives. That "extra-specially fat American" image that you see, that seems to be far less common across the rest of the world, is largely down to snacks full of corn syrup and hydrogenated fats being widely available and very cheap.

Cherie 03-03-2019 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10463295)
The reason for that, though, is that it invariably leads to "splashback" spreading the bacteria from raw chicken to the sink area / any nearby dishes or cutlery and that's where contamination occurs whereas if chicken is in date and properly cooked through there shouldn't really be any risk of food poisoning. Although a lot of people undercook chicken.

As you know Cherie I'm firmly anti-Brexit but I think this particular issue is a red herring; I have some concerns about American farming METHODS such as overuse of pesticide / use of pesticides banned here but that's an environmental concern. I honestly don't think there's anything at all wrong with the quality of US produced fresh food. The American health crisis (just like our own) is down to what's done with those products afterwards... i.e. their processed foods, which are full of vast quantities of high fructose corn syrup, MSG, hydrogenated fats and other chemical additives. That "extra-specially fat American" image that you see, that seems to be far less common across the rest of the world, is largely down to snacks full of corn syrup and hydrogenated fats being widely available and very cheap.

Should we not be learning from our past mistakes? Obesity in Britain is down to our love and import of many things American in particular their fast food chains, in this new dawn, and when 'we are in control of our own trade deals' the brave thing to do would be to pick and choose what we import, I don't know why you are saying its a red herring I was just listening to Liam Fox talking about this, and the alternative to not taking this type of product is to import more American organic but of course that wont be a money spinner now will it and won't be taken up by our Acadamys, hospitals and care homes, and again I reiterate not sure why everyone is foccused on chlorination when the other two issues are a far grimmer prospect

user104658 03-03-2019 10:26 AM

I disagree Cherie; obesity / diabetes crisis is caused by a combination of abundantly available processed food in supermarkets (which didn't used to be available), and poor mental health (which has always been a thing but is increasing). Emotionally healthy people don't become obese no matter what food is available. It's not the food.

MTVN 03-03-2019 10:52 AM

Fox also agreed that it's not a safety issue, even if this food did start being used in schools and care homes etc I'm not sure it's any worse than the current cheapest alternatives that they use now. And with an ageing and growing population I think it's legitimate to look at how different methods could help with that. The obesity link is a bit tenuous imo, agree with TS that there are much more important other factors

Fox was suggesting that we probably wouldn't accept these methods anyway and that it was standard stuff for the US to request at the start of a negotiation but not necessarily a major sticking point

Northern Monkey 03-03-2019 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10463165)
That not the point though, we shouldn't be importing sub standard products after Brexit just to get 'a deal' otherwise the UK is being held hostage to an even worse scenario than we currently have....I thought the whole point of Brexit was that we held our own destiny in our hands, not that you best take this sub standard crap otherwise we aint playing ......the idea that Brexiteers are even on board with this scenario is pretty laughable...looks like a case of well obvs I won’t be eating it but some other mug can have the pleasure

Who’s saying US meat is “sub standard” though?

Different farming methods to the EU doesn’t automatically mean bad.
If anything you’d think chlorine washed chicken would be safer than just water washed chicken?

As for growth hormone,Is there any evidence that it gets passed on to humans through consumption and if so that it’s in any way harmful?

Maybe the US’ farming techniques are actually ahead of the curve?

Maybe all countries will adopt these practices soon enough anyway?

Alot of this stuff to me seems like project fear 3.0 tbh.

bots 03-03-2019 05:32 PM

British farmers are getting jumpy because they have been protected for decades in the EU. The biggest concern will be that they get priced out the market

Cherie 03-03-2019 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey (Post 10463487)
Who’s saying US meat is “sub standard” though?

Different farming methods to the EU doesn’t automatically mean bad.
If anything you’d think chlorine washed chicken would be safer than just water washed chicken?

As for growth hormone,Is there any evidence that it gets passed on to humans through consumption and if so that it’s in any way harmful?

Maybe the US’ farming techniques are actually ahead of the curve?

Maybe all countries will adopt these practices soon enough anyway?

Alot of this stuff to me seems like project fear 3.0 tbh.

thats alot of ifs and buts, will you be feeding your children the beef full of hormones?

also how do you feel about American dictating the terms of the deal because that is how its looking from where I am sitting

Cherie 03-03-2019 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 10463311)
Fox also agreed that it's not a safety issue, even if this food did start being used in schools and care homes etc I'm not sure it's any worse than the current cheapest alternatives that they use now. And with an ageing and growing population I think it's legitimate to look at how different methods could help with that. The obesity link is a bit tenuous imo, agree with TS that there are much more important other factors

Fox was suggesting that we probably wouldn't accept these methods anyway and that it was standard stuff for the US to request at the start of a negotiation but not necessarily a major sticking point

The obesity link is tenuous :joker:

MTVN 03-03-2019 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10463695)
The obesity link is tenuous :joker:

Well yeah the only place I've seen the two linked is on here, what's the evidence that these methods contribute to obesity?

Cherie 03-03-2019 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 10463756)
Well yeah the only place I've seen the two linked is on here, what's the evidence that these methods contribute to obesity?

Read and digest (pardon the pun) what I have actually posted, I never said these methods contribute to obesity, I said we should learn from what we have already imported from the US...ie Mc Donalds, KFC, hotdogs, doughnuts...etc.............ect.........etc......

what I actually posted, not sure why this wasn't clear to you?

Should we not be learning from our past mistakes? Obesity in Britain is down to our love and import of many things American in particular their fast food chains

user104658 03-03-2019 07:00 PM

The "supersize" obesity problem in the US is down to hydrogenated fats, HFCS and the culture of the food service industry supplying huge portions as standard. Oh and the weird tenancy to add sugar to products that don't need it, like bread and milk. There's not really any mystery around it, these things are already known. But sugar has always been an abundant and cheap energy source in the US so it's sort of baked into ( :hehe: ) their culture.

Cherie 03-03-2019 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10463815)
The "supersize" obesity problem in the US is down to hydrogenated fats, HFCS and the culture of the food service industry supplying huge portions as standard. Oh and the weird tenancy to add sugar to products that don't need it, like bread and milk. There's not really any mystery around it, these things are already known. But sugar has always been an abundant and cheap energy source in the US so it's sort of baked into ( :hehe: ) their culture.

we wont learn from that though will we, we NEED a trade deal, so lets just bring even more ****ty stuff in so we can stretch the health service even more, then we can buy even more of their over priced pharmaceuticals and privatise the NHS because the state wont be able to cope. YAY!

MTVN 03-03-2019 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10463810)
Read and digest (pardon the pun) what I have actually posted, I never said these methods contribute to obesity, I said we should learn from what we have already imported from the US...ie Mc Donalds, KFC, hotdogs, doughnuts...etc.............ect.........etc......

what I actually posted, not sure why this wasn't clear to you?

Should we not be learning from our past mistakes? Obesity in Britain is down to our love and import of many things American in particular their fast food chains

Stuff the whole world has imported, its not really relevant to this particular issue of farming methods so yeah it still seems pretty tenuous to me..

MTVN 03-03-2019 09:53 PM

Should we never import anything from the US ever again because some families got fat from eating McDonald's every day :shrug:

Marsh. 03-03-2019 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10463810)
Read and digest (pardon the pun) what I have actually posted, I never said these methods contribute to obesity, I said we should learn from what we have already imported from the US...ie Mc Donalds, KFC, hotdogs, doughnuts...etc.............ect.........etc......

This is a stretch. We have junk food and would have junk food regardless of if American franchises can sell their own junk food over here.

Most of it tastes and is made differently to how it is done in the US anyway so there is no connection to the type of thing they're proposing now.

user104658 04-03-2019 06:46 AM

Tbqfh good ol' British fish & chips are far worse than most meals from KFC or McDonald's... And things like Chinese and Indian take-aways aren't much better.

I just think this argument is off the mark simply because it misunderstands the reasons for bad relationships with food and related health / weight problems. People overeat for comfort and eat badly because of lifestyle. The type of food and where it came from is largely irrelevant.

The only slightly relevant factor is the price and availability; there is an issue in the US with huge portion sizes being expected for a reasonable price. But... Let's be honest here... No matter what else happens with Brexit, I don't think food getting CHEAPER is a realistic outcome. We'll in fact be very lucky if it doesn't become significantly more expensive.

Cherie 04-03-2019 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN (Post 10464359)
Should we never import anything from the US ever again because some families got fat from eating McDonald's every day :shrug:

You are missing my point, obesity is a huge drain on the NHS and a leading cause of cancer, whats the point of leaving one Union where we are dictated only to replace it by another even worse dictator, these foods are banned for a reason and not available in the EU, I thought the whole point of leaving the EU was so we could make our own deals, be in charge of our own destiny yadda yadda …..

also I have to laugh at all the...well I won't be buying it posts and the consumer will have the choice......there is a serious hint of I'm alright Jack raising its head there

Cherie 04-03-2019 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10464514)
Tbqfh good ol' British fish & chips are far worse than most meals from KFC or McDonald's... And things like Chinese and Indian take-aways aren't much better.

I just think this argument is off the mark simply because it misunderstands the reasons for bad relationships with food and related health / weight problems. People overeat for comfort and eat badly because of lifestyle. The type of food and where it came from is largely irrelevant.

The only slightly relevant factor is the price and availability; there is an issue in the US with huge portion sizes being expected for a reasonable price. But... Let's be honest here... No matter what else happens with Brexit, I don't think food getting CHEAPER is a realistic outcome. We'll in fact be very lucky if it doesn't become significantly more expensive.


Yes and when the deals with India and China include sending banned foods or drugs to the UK I will raise it, I don't know what argument you are trying to make as you keep going off in non relatable tangents

bots 04-03-2019 08:07 AM

The only way the UK will benefit economically from leaving the EU is by reducing standards in order to reduce production costs. Give those outside of the EU the cheap **** they crave. This lowering of standards works both ways though in that we will be over run with complete tosh. You pay your money and you take your choice. I'm sure euro goods will still be available, just a lot more expensive.

Cherie 04-03-2019 08:11 AM

just seen this blog from DR and she has put it much better than I ever will....hope you don't mind me reproducing it here..

rexit was described by US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross as a “God-given opportunity” to take business from the UK, while Britain is facing a “period of confusion”.

We have outsourced ourselves for decades to the EU and subsequently have very little experience on how to make good trade deals and because of the imbalance of market size, that puts us in a terrible bargaining position. This could well end up as a game of bullying and when it comes to bullying, the larger guy usually wins.

What we are going to end up with is American rabid free traders because most people won’t be willing to pay for expensive cuts of British meat and dairy products. Our own prices will cripple the economic sustainability of large parts of our farming and that’s why the American food chain will move in with ease. The more we are forced to close down, the more unaffordable our meat and dairy products will become.

Remember what happened when Thatcher removed the tariffs from imported coal? This is going to be the same story again and again and for what… for some short term gain to a small number of people at the top.

And for those worried about chlorinated chicken (and so you should be), its not just food. Food labelling, in fact any labelling will have to be deregulated. Changes in our NHS system will almost certainly happen. Undermining our already crippled NHS by charging for pharmaceutical products more in line with America will ensure our NHS fails. It means changing our laws, our standards. Compromising our environment, giving up more and more control to the big boy.

Should we be scared, I mean could we be cleaned out like Wilbur Ross is so gleefully suggesting? As far as I can see it, we are jumping from one union straight into another… out of the frying pan into the fire. Its like we have nothing to gain and everything to lose.

Cherie 06-03-2019 09:00 AM

The Duchess of Sussex has entered the post-Brexit trade deal row over chlorine-washed chicken from America.
Californian-born Meghan yesterday expressed her clear unease about ‘industrial US food systems’ and how ‘badly wrong the US food systems are’.

arista 06-03-2019 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10466390)
The Duchess of Sussex has entered the post-Brexit trade deal row over chlorine-washed chicken from America.
Californian-born Meghan yesterday expressed her clear unease about ‘industrial US food systems’ and how ‘badly wrong the US food systems are’.



Of course she would

Cherie 06-03-2019 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 10466392)
Of course she would

well she is better placed than most of us to comment :suspect:

user104658 06-03-2019 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10466390)
The Duchess of Sussex has entered the post-Brexit trade deal row over chlorine-washed chicken from America.
Californian-born Meghan yesterday expressed her clear unease about ‘industrial US food systems’ and how ‘badly wrong the US food systems are’.

:nono: Has no one told her yet that the Royals aren't supposed to take political sides? Maybe after she has her baby she'll learn how to look pretty and stay quiet :hmph:. Harry needs to get his house in order and Kate needs to ramp up the Stepford lessons, this is unacceptable loud-mouthery.

Cherie 06-03-2019 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10466431)
:nono: Has no one told her yet that the Royals aren't supposed to take political sides? Maybe after she has her baby she'll learn how to look pretty and stay quiet :hmph:. Harry needs to get his house in order and Kate needs to ramp up the Stepford lessons, this is unacceptable loud-mouthery.

will someone tell her to play by the rules :worry:

user104658 06-03-2019 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10466436)
will someone tell her to play by the rules :worry:

I know Cherie! These Americans, coming in here, taking our princes, loudly stating their opinions. Chlorinating our chicken and Momo'ing our children:fist:

Cherie 06-03-2019 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10466442)
I know Cherie! These Americans, coming in here, taking our princes, loudly stating their opinions. Chlorinating our chicken and Momo'ing our children:fist:

:joker:

Livia 06-03-2019 11:53 AM

No one cares what Meghan thinks. Actresses are just there to say the words written by more intelligent people.

Twosugars 06-03-2019 02:00 PM

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...exit-standards

Quote:

Food fight: doubts grow over post-Brexit standards

Soil Association raises concerns over chlorinated chicken and hormone-fed beef

Chlorinated chicken and hormone-fed beef are already infecting the debate over a post-Brexit trade deal, with one of the US’s most senior diplomats dismissing the European Union’s “museum of agriculture” approach to food safety.

The US ambassador, Woody Johnson, claimed fears over US food standards leading to lower quality food were “myths” and part of a “smear campaign” to cast American farming in the worst possible light.

The environment secretary, Michael Gove, has pledged that food standards will be the same if not better after the UK leaves the EU, but campaigners are concerned that welfare and environmental protections could be jettisoned in the rush to strike a US trade deal.

On Wednesday, the leading Brexit supporter George Eustice, who resigned from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs last week, wrote in the Guardian that the UK should not countenance signing any deal that would reduce food standards as it could “give free trade a bad name”. He called US agriculture “quite backward”.

Chlorinated chicken and the use of hormones in animals and animal feed, along with the use of pesticides and food colourants, remain among the top concerns of the Soil Association, which will launch an updated food risk list for US-UK trade talks later this week.

“UK public health and wildlife could be negatively affected if our food and farming standards are sacrificed in pursuit of a US trade deal,” said Rob Percival, the organisation’s head of policy. “UK farmers have been making positive strides in recent years, reducing farm antibiotic use and these efforts risk being undermined by a trade deal that floods the UK market with US meat.”

Food practices listed among the 10 risks to Britain in a US-UK trade deal by the Soil Association include:

Chlorinated chicken
In the US, farmers are allowed to use chlorine washes and other disinfectants to remove harmful bacteria that may have infected the birds during rearing and slaughter. The EU banned the practice 22 years ago, leading to a long-running dispute over imports of chicken from the US.

The US poultry sector has argued the ban in the EU is not based on science, but the EU is concerned that chlorine may compensate or mask poorer hygiene and animal welfare standards earlier in the food chain.

The European Food Safety Authority has concluded that “chemical substances found in poultry meat are unlikely to pose an immediate or acute health threat to consumers”, but a team of microbiologists from Southampton University found last year that some bacteria remained completely active after chlorine washing.

Antibiotics
The Soil Association report on risks to food in a US-UK trade deal says that the use of “antibiotics per animal in US farming is on average a shocking five times higher than in the UK”.

Antibiotic resistance is one of the gravest public health threats facing the world and investigations last year by the Food Safety and Inspection Service showed that powerful antibiotics were still being used despite new rules to curb their use and combat the spread of deadly superbugs.

Data from a US investigation seen by the Guardian showed that 13 separate antibiotics classed by the World Health Organization as “critically important” to human medicine were still being used in meat supply chains.

Hormone-fed beef
Cattle producers in the US and other countries use hormones to induce faster, bigger animal growth but they have been banned in the EU since 1989.

Australia and America are both pushing to have hormone-treated beef included in any future trade deal with the UK, arguing that the EU’s position on the subject is scientifically flawed.

The EU currently allows some imports of beef from the US but they are for high quality non-hormone treated meat.

American farmers have long complained that the EU quota was a bad deal for them because it was exactly the same as was made available to smaller WTO countries such as Australia and Uruguay.

Ractopamine
Ractopamine is a growth hormone used to promote leanness in animals by shifting nutrients into muscle and away from fat deposition. It is administered in the days leading up to slaughter.

It is banned by the EU, mainland China, Russia and almost 160 other countries but not in the US, Japan or North Korea. According to the European parliament, “the substance is widely used: according to some estimates, in the rearing of 60-80% of all pigs produced” in the US.

In swine, the drug is linked to several adverse effects including hyperactivity, broken limbs and trembling.

Food colouring
In the US, products that include Yellow 5 and 6, Red 3 and 40, Blue 1 and 2, Green 3 and Orange B are available for purchase and do not require labelling. The UK banned these food dyes following a 2007 double-blind study that found eating artificially coloured food appeared to increase children’s hyperactivity.

Food colours are contained in many foods and drinks, including snacks, margarine, cheese, jams and desserts.

Cherie 06-03-2019 02:19 PM

actopamine
Ractopamine is a growth hormone used to promote leanness in animals by shifting nutrients into muscle and away from fat deposition. It is administered in the days leading up to slaughter.

It is banned by the EU, mainland China, Russia and almost 160 other countries but not in the US, Japan or North Korea. According to the European parliament, “the substance is widely used: according to some estimates, in the rearing of 60-80% of all pigs produced” in the US.

In swine, the drug is linked to several adverse effects including hyperactivity, broken limbs and trembling.


Banned in Russia and China.....:idc: that doesn't sound very promising now does it?

user104658 06-03-2019 02:56 PM

To be fair, of that list, the heavy use of antibiotics in farming does concern me quite a bit. It's also one that affects all of us, no matter what we choose to eat.

arista 07-03-2019 03:42 PM

https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net...92&oe=5D16022A


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.