Originally Posted by Ammi (Post 10682600)

...Greta is leading the way for our children from China as well, Arista...all steps are important steps...

Originally Posted by Alf (Post 10682596)

Yeah! that'll be it.

So what you're saying is that every scientist who agrees with you is honest and correct, and every one who disagrees with you is corrupt and wrong. How fortunate for you.

Originally Posted by Twosugars (Post 10682603)

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position.
Nasa

The scientific consensus is that the global average surface temperature has risen over the past century. Scientific opinion on climate change was summarized in the 2001 Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The main conclusions on global warming at that time were as follows:

The global average surface temperature has risen 0.6 ± 0.2 °C since the late 19th century, and 0.17 °C per decade in the years 1971–2001.[5]
"There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities", in particular emissions of the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane.[6]
If greenhouse gas emissions continue the warming will also continue, with temperatures projected to increase by 1.4 °C to 5.8 °C between 1990 and 2100.[A] Accompanying this temperature increase will be increases in some types of extreme weather and a projected sea level rise.[7] The balance of impacts of global warming become significantly negative at larger values of warming.[8]
These findings are recognized by the national science academies of all the major industrialized nations;[9] the consensus has strengthened over time[10] and is now virtually unanimous.[11] The level of consensus correlates with expertise in climate science.[12]
Wikipedia

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 10682497)

it's not a good look attacking a child Arista

Originally Posted by Alf (Post 10682543)

People have been predicting these Doomsday scenarios for 1000s of centuries. They're nothing new.

In my lifetime, it's been a hole in the ozone layer, the Greenhouse effect, global warming and now climate change.

Do you buy everything a salesman offers you?

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10682757)

get the balloons oot ya door faced **** actress.

Originally Posted by Dia. (Post 10682764)

Bit of an odd thing to say about a 16 year old

Originally Posted by Dia. (Post 10682764)

Bit of an odd thing to say about a 16 year old

Originally Posted by Twosugars (Post 10682778)

Well when you dont have arguments, insults must do :shrug:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 10682827)

I'm a bit worried about her tbh, she seems genuinely depressed now... the realisation that governments don't want to help and worse actively agitate against green initiatives to protect big business must be hitting hard :(

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10682828)

She's being used now...opened up to ridicule and heartbreak...

Originally Posted by Twosugars (Post 10682830)

By the hard right

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10682837)

Probably by her parents, but of course I must remember the hard right is responsible for all the world's woes...silly me.

Originally Posted by arista (Post 10682843)

https://storify.com/services/proxy/2...2XlM_greta.JPG


Young Lady
China has Failed you
they do not care that you are watching them.

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10682847)

She's aged.....:nono:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10682837)

Probably by her parents, but of course I must remember the hard right is responsible for all the world's woes...silly me.

Originally Posted by Twosugars (Post 10682849)

They attack her all the time. As if climate change only affected liberals :laugh:
That's the sort of nasty destructive arseholes they are

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10682853)

We need a graph at least that shows the demographic and political leaning of all her online attackers before that can be held up....anywhere else, but tibb.

Originally Posted by Twosugars (Post 10682856)

Start with Aaron Banks the moneybags of farage
He hoped she'd have a yacht accident on her way to America.
What a charmer

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10682837)

Probably by her parents, but of course I must remember the hard right is responsible for all the world's woes...silly me.

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10682828)

She's being used now...opened up to ridicule and heartbreak...

Originally Posted by Alf (Post 10682877)

You can see in this thread why they use a child. Because any criticism will be met with the defence of "It's disgusting to say that about a child"

The Nazis also used a child to spread their propaganda. That child was also a girl, that girl also wore her hair in pigtails, (or whatever style of tails they're called which Greta wears her hair) just a coincidence, I'm sure.

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 10682888)

What makes me laugh is that even if you don't believe in climate change anything we can do to clean up the air and water is essential for our ongoing survival. How can anyone deny that? If someone came along and took a dump on your dinner, you would soon have something to say about it, and that's basically what is happening at the moment with the likes of Trump and China cheering them on.

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper (Post 10682891)

You're now using Dinesh D'souza, the convicted criminal and pseudo-historian for your memes?

You've used Ben Shapiro and this fool in the last few days. If you believe in truth as much as you claim, then look into the background of this charlatan.

Originally Posted by Alf (Post 10682896)

What's this, a report from Clown World?

I'm using Dinesh D'Souza and Ben Shapiro What are you talking about?

Does that mean you're using a 16 year old girl called Greta?

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper (Post 10682897)

No, you used the bs from Ben Shapiro about Nazi gun control, and now you've just recycled Dinesh.



Look familiar?

Originally Posted by Alf (Post 10682877)

You can see in this thread why they use a child. Because any criticism will be met with the defence of "It's disgusting to say that about a child"

The Nazis also used a child to spread their propaganda. That child was also a girl, that girl also wore her hair in pigtails, (or whatever style of tails they're called which Greta wears her hair) just a coincidence, I'm sure.

Originally Posted by Alf (Post 10682898)

Let's say for arguments sake I did (I didn't by the way) then what's your point?

Is your point that the Nazis didn't use children to push their propaganda, and that Dinesh is telling lies?

Originally Posted by Twosugars (Post 10682900)

Deluded argument.
The issue existed before she got involved and will exist after she's gone.
If you can't argue the message let's attack the messenger huh

That's why climate change deniers like trump or banks go after the girl, so much easier.
And also so cowardly.

Bolsonaro is even attacking the catholic church now for, wait for it, being too left bc it dares to be concerned about the environment. You couldn't make it up.

Sad. But not surprising.