North Korea has been threatening the same for decades, and they actually do have nukes. Trump seems to love Kim though.

:conf:

And that doesn't change the fact that it's true. Trump doesn't have a Hillary to rely on this time around, he won't have russian leaks either and if he tries the same tactics, everyone has a Ukraine sized counter argument to use against him.

He can't win this election without starting a war, whether you believe it or not doesn't matter to anyone really, you can deny reality but you can't stop it from happening.

The best ya got?

https://media0.giphy.com/media/7NWhfa1lEHPqw/giphy.gif

Accusing someone of whataboutism only works if they are trying to justify something by saying 'well, what about this?'. Highlighting someone's hypocrisy by mentioning their different reactions to two similar situations is not whataboutism, it's pointing out hypocrisy.

I'm sure you were calling a 2nd term for trump a little while back...calling has supporters idiots in the process. .I may be wrong so will admit it if I am.

It's possible, after all stupidity won the day in 2016 and I do fear the corruption that could steal this election but the more I hear about the stats and forecasts, the more hopeful I become.

Unlike some people, I look at facts that are contrary to my opinion and learn from them, not discard them. You should try it sometime.

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cp...v043811904.jpg

His Truck
hit by three super fast missiles
fired from a High up out of sight Drone.
Instant Death for Gen Qasem Soleimani


Iran says they will return with a
Harsh Attack on Americans?

https://www.lepoint.fr/images/2012/0...08_660x281.JPG

this guy, Esmail Ghaani is the replacement of Soleimani

I hope we stay the hell out of all this, but I doubt we will, since America will have us on a leash post-Brexit

That and bojo the clown as pm.
It is guaranteed he will do something stupid :laugh:
It's not if, it is when

it all depends how it pans out. If it escalates quickly, major powers will have to choose sides. A british tanker in the gulf is going to be a sitting target without protection and we just don't have the means for that without allies.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed that it is more sabre rattling than anything else.

depends if britain goes for the Alliance with USA

So far
its his Death.
Nothing else has begun.

Johnson PM
does not want another Error War.


Now , though, Iran is even more
United against Trump.

thankfully we dont have a labour government so the chance of us going into a stupid war in the middle east are much lower

We have a stupid government that would join anyway, labour or not.

It's a historical fact that conservative governments merely protect British soil.

the whole Government are stupid?

what on earth does that mean?

I’m not falling into the trap of answering the question you already know the answer to.

I’ll let Bojo the clown answer it for you though

The PM is a clown and the whole government are stupid?

this isnt twitter


:umm2:

They launched a drone attack on foreign soil, that is an act of war.

George Orwell would be impressed with this doublespeak

???

Jeremy Corbyn would definitely not get involved in any war, and I guess you’re referencing to Tony Blair which in fact was New Labour very different to labour today in some forms. And you’ll actually find it was a labour government under Harold Wilson that stopped us from being involved in the Vietnam war in the late 60s, even I know that and I wasn’t even alive.

https://media.giphy.com/media/l0HlNm...i7QI/giphy.gif

Is this a good or bad thing?

we are already in an alliance with the USA, it's called NATO

So if USA goes to war so do we?

Toppling that terror regime isn't exactly a bad thing, but they're not close or threatening to us for it to be worth the consequences.

Imagine supporting UK/US involvement in Middle Eastern politics

:laugh:

https://storify.com/services/proxy/2...Ljg_guardy.JPG

https://storify.com/services/proxy/2...fzia_times.JPG

https://storify.com/services/proxy/2...66hSL_indy.JPG

https://storify.com/services/proxy/2...uTsDDA_exp.JPG

Dont be obtuse. Did germany or france rush to join Iraqi war?
Theres alliance and theres being up america' rectum.
We know what is Britain's preference

Come on LT, you can't argue with reasoned, well thought out debate like that.

Parliament opens on Tuesday
do it then.

nope, Germany/France aren't that closely involved in that Iraqi war


our dutch foreign minister btw had stated we are gonna pull out our boats in the area, out of caution and risk of being attacked now because of America's crimes

if it escalates into a proper war with the USA against Iran then the NATO countries are duty bound to come to the assistance of the USA. That is the whole point about NATO. People really should be more aware of the world they live in

and then what, putting themselves into danger :umm2:


and as for that last sentence, i am aware of what world we live in, also Trump is in the wrong here

like i earlier stated, you should Always try to negotiate at a neutral location first of all, and only kill a major military official as a last resort, and i mean Trump's ''negotiating'' with the both korea's was a by the media called success so what is the difference here then


since North Korea also was a same (or even worse) nuclear threat towards the US, and now also a threat possibly when Kim had stated they are working on new strategic weapons