Perhaps the older generation should have done a better job at passing on their so called respect. It's no secret both Harry and Meghan’s fathers failed at that.

I think these people see decency and respect as a kind of weakness sadly. How anyone can support their behaviour is beyond me but those that have that mindset to treat people like that....always remember what goes around comes around...and it really does as we have seen with Meghan and Harry.
Anyone who thinks they are successful and happy are blind to the fact that the backlash they have had from the UK and the elite Americans is not what they want and it will eat away at them unless they can turn it around...but thats unlikely as the ugly untrustworthy traits have been well and truly exposed.

Proving the point that its always someone else's fault...:joker:

:laugh: We rest our case.

It's learned behaviour so yes it is someone else's fault.

Says the unaware person whose hatred and bile against any poster who doesn't agree with them is plain for all to see.

The court case evidence:

"The crash of Meghan's credibility has been dramatic. Her integrity hangs on a thin thread."

Tom Bower - bio of Meghan due next year.

Nothing we haven't heard before from those so desperate to see her cancelled :pat:

Meghans letter.

Camilla Long
The Sunday Times

"I feel ashamed of the way we are being induced to accept this manipulative document as remotely ‘private’. It is private in the sense the Trojan Horse was a convenient mode of transport. It looked like a letter and felt like a letter, but in fact it was something else entirely."

:clap1:

Really?...so as an adult you cant make your own decisions and recognise good and bad behaviour....thats sad.

Yes...it was manufactured "in case it was made public"...:laugh:

Never said otherwise? It would help however if the older generation you speak so highly of set a better example.

I feel sorry for Meghan, all these people claiming hate her and everything she does, but are still very happy to cash their cheques from her name, she’s being used as a patsy by people who are all too happy to use and manipulate the eternally angry in the process, poor woman, even her own ‘family’ are doing it, I couldn’t even imagine how hard that must be

Which is why you would think Meghan and Harry would know better...they are parents...you would think they would be setting an example for them..but clearly not. Its quite sad these children will grow up in isolation of their bigger family because of the bad decisions their parents made...but theres always the Chickens and The Bench...

She's nothing more than a cash cow to the media who know they can make money off of idiots who buy into tabloid gossip. These people who can't even see how easily manipulated they are deserve the most sympathy.

But the truth is, a lot isn't just tabloid gossip, its proven fact. You and others are the ones being manipulated and duped because you have blinkers on or you just refuse to admit she isn't the sweet lovely caring person she presented herself to be - far from it.

....and here is some more 'gossip' for you. According to Lady Colin Campbell an impeccable source has reported to her that Harry is privately 'in turmoil' because the blinkers are falling from his eyes.
If true, too bad Harry, you made your bed....

She has set herself up as an 'influencer' who jumps on any bandwagon going to gain approval from the woke generation, but really she is just an attention seeking super privileged, dollar greedy elite by marriage....and who wants their children influenced by a known liar, manipulator and hypocrite? Some do, apparently.

Her version of events have been disproved in court documents. Keep up.

Trump predicted this the other night

it will of course end in divorce and im sure

i would never be so unkind as to suggest that has always been part of the plan....

:skull:

It will end in divorce when she has served her purpose of keeping Andrew out the news.

She will live comfortably for ever after, as will andrew, Harry's favourite uncle.

The sad part is that I am sure Harry would just love his family to meet his daughter….Meghan has created this rift in the family and she won’t be setting foot in the UK again because of the backlash…so Unless Harry brings them here alone then it’s not going to happen. No wonder he is in turmoil…he really didn’t think it through did he?
It can go one of two ways….he will either continue to bear a grudge with his family or he will start to resent Meghan for it…:shrug:

i think we put too much of the blame on meghan. My own belief is that they fed each others paranoia and re-enforced their "truth" between them until they actually believed it was fact

Load of misogynistic nonsense as usual, even if you do think they (as a couple) are in the wrong. Poor wee Harry led astray by a woman. It’s just a completely false narrative and to believe it at all, you have to completely ignore Harry’s clear feelings about the firm, AND all of his clear feelings about the British press that were present long before he even met her. Harry’s issues with his family stem from his mothers death, not his wife. That is abundantly obvious and quite understandable.

Until Harry accepts a drunk driver killed his mother and not "the meedjaaar" I fear he cannot move along and will be stuck in this toxic dependant relationship

Meghan won the case but what came out in the appeal was more damaging
Also Harry came out looking equally bad.

Not the type of person’s you could trust

Harry said himself that he wouldn’t have left the Firm if he hadn’t met Meghan. He may have resented certain press but he didn’t hate them as much as he says he does now when they say he was the one in the Royal family who bantered with them and even drank with them in the pubs before he met Meghan. Listen to some youtube vids of Sun photographer Arthur Edwards; his recollections of Harry’s relationship with the press and snappers may surprise many. Read a bio of him from 8 years ago or so by an author who was allowed access to him on his trips and engagements for 10 months and again, a completely different Harry appears.

Meghan played on his history, his sensitivities and his hot headed temperament to bring out his vulnerabilities. She played on being the poor victim, badly treated just like his poor mother and was a sweet, sensitve, caring soul who just wanted to change the ills of the world. She emulated Diana, his lost mother. All to make sure she got him back to the US with her and away from his family.

Everything points to that being her plan all along, and Harry was happy enough to fall in with it because he was besotted. Dividing and isolating is a typical move by a narcissist which I believe Meghan is.
It has nothing to do with misogyny either, Meghan could just as easily been a man and Harry a woman in this saga.

Harry was punching the air when he met Meghan…couldn’t believe his luck. Completely mesmerised by her and has been her lapdog ever since.

You are on about people who were sons of fathers, who's fathers were absent, or present. Very brutal words, especially after what they had to endure.


A few years, what felt like a lifetime, in the trenches of Belgium. A man thrust home into the world of a young child and a LOVING wife, after years of MYSERERY, alone but not alone in a foreign field.

The life of a young boomer comes in many guises dezzy, perhaps look at their upbringing, their mental health issues before being so dismissive.


Or just say the usual, **** their mental health issues though eh!!

Let's see how his court case goes.

Yep, and when Harry met Meghan it could have been more a case of strategic planning on her part than luck...:hee:

Meghan’s long time best friend Misha Nonoo’s husband was a close friend of Harry’s and she was the one thought to set them up on the blind date. Meghan was a member of Soho House and was close to Soho’s consultant Markus Anderson who also knew Harry well. Princess Eugenie frequented Soho House and Meghan befriended her through Markus.

Yet Meghan, who already knew these people who were friends with Harry (one of them for years, in Misha’s husband) and who was in London ‘looking for a famous English guy to date’ (her own words) said in the engagement interview that she didn’t know anything about Harry and didn’t even google him before their blind date but just wanted to know ‘was he kind’.
Well now, the mind does boggle. :think:

The Telegraph

Laws could be changed to protect press freedoms following Meghan, Duchess of Sussex's legal victory

Downing Street has hinted at introducing new safeguards to protect the freedom of the press, in the wake of the Duchess of Sussex’s legal victory over the Mail on Sunday.
The Government would “study the implications” of the Court of Appeal decision in the case “carefully”, a spokesman for Boris Johnson announced on Friday...

…..Politicians, lawyers and campaigners raised concerns in the wake of the latest judgment that the courts are interpreting the law in a way that extends privacy rights beyond what was intended by Parliament.
John Whittingdale, the former Tory culture secretary, accused judges of creating far-reaching privacy laws without parliamentary scrutiny, branding it a “matter of great concern”.
Geoffrey Robertson QC, the leading human rights barrister, said earlier this week: “Privacy is now a growth industry. The law has been developed – in fact, created – by judges. But instead of applying a presumption in favour of free speech, they purport to ‘balance’ it with often over-valued reputations of rich and famous litigants.”.....etc