ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Meghan to receive £1 in damages after privacy case (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=379318)

Jordan. 06-01-2022 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11127078)
Those amounts are pathetic for a high profile couple who have been busy raising many many millions in deals all for themselves.

Interesting piece in the DM - must be all lies of course....:laugh:

[Financial details of the Sussexes' charities and companies in the US are far more scant, thanks to their decision to incorporate their organizations in Delaware, notorious for its lack of corporate transparency.

Anti-corruption organization Transparency International has slammed the state as 'a place where extreme corporate secrecy enables corrupt people, shady companies, drug traffickers, embezzlers and fraudsters to cover their tracks when shifting dirty money from one place to another,' – although law-abiding businesses also incorporate there.
Though both Archewell's HQ and the couple's home being in California, all their charities and associated companies are incorporated in Delaware.
Even a company set up to hold the Archewell trademark was founded in Delaware – and appears to have not yet filed documents with the California Secretary of State despite being based in Beverly Hills.]

None of this answered the question I asked.

jet 06-01-2022 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 11127079)
None of this answered the question I asked.

I work for charities, I'm not a high profile public figure that owns them....and I don't like to boast.

Jordan. 06-01-2022 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11127080)
I work for charities, I'm not a high profile public figure that owns them....and I don't like to boast.

Sure thing, odd such a charitable non boastful person like yourself would openly scoff at any amount raised.

Beso 06-01-2022 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11127062)
Tbh Meghan's gonna get abuse no matter what the sum ends up being.

It's her own fault.

jet 06-01-2022 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 11127081)
Sure thing, odd such a charitable non boastful person like yourself would openly scoff at any amount raised.

If you are happy with that paltry amount, which smacks of neglect, while H&M concentrate on making deals to fatten their bank account with millions upon millions, then what do you care what I think? :fan:

Jordan. 06-01-2022 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11127094)
If you are happy with that paltry amount, which smacks of neglect, while H&M concentrate on making deals to fatten their bank account with millions upon millions, then what do you care what I think? :fan:

Wasn't you gleefully telling us how broke they were recently? Hard to care what anyone who constantly changes the narrative to fit their argument has to say.

Cherie 06-01-2022 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11127077)
:facepalm:

:joker:

Jordan. 06-01-2022 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11127105)
:joker:

https://media.giphy.com/media/3gYWog...9K6D/giphy.gif

rusticgal 06-01-2022 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 11127076)
How much have you raised for charity in the last 12 months? I'm assuming a lot.


You do realise you are making a ridiculous comparison…:joker:

Jordan. 06-01-2022 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11127114)
You do realise you are making a ridiculous comparison…:joker:

Here I was thinking ridiculousness was the tone for the crimes of Meghan Markle threads.

rusticgal 07-01-2022 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 11127116)
Here I was thinking ridiculousness was the tone for the crimes of Meghan Markle threads.


Wrong on both accounts :hee:

thesheriff443 07-01-2022 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11127122)
Wrong on both accounts :hee:

His queen and her man child are compulsive liars, who lied to the world and it’s dog to get the sympathy card.

Won a court only to lose all credibility

Mystic Mock 07-01-2022 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11127073)
Mock, could you explain what you mean by the Mail fabricating details in the court case? Have you a link that refers to this? :conf:

Well again it was another personal attack against Meghan to try and paint her in a bad light with the letter exchange between Meghan and her Father with no impartiality.

Plus they shouldn't be reporting such personal conversations without the Celeb's permission.

jet 07-01-2022 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 11127099)
Wasn't you gleefully telling us how broke they were recently?

No, I was not. You are mistaken.

Mystic Mock 07-01-2022 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11127075)
It's actually 37k LT.
They are too greedy lining their own pockets to care about promoting their charity....and Harry's Travalyst had made the Princely sum of 12k.

Tbf we're in a Pandemic.

How many people do you think are donating to Charities full stop at the moment? Let alone specifically H&M's?

rusticgal 07-01-2022 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11127124)
Well again it was another personal attack against Meghan to try and paint her in a bad light with the letter exchange between Meghan and her Father with no impartiality.

Plus they shouldn't be reporting such personal conversations without the Celeb's permission.


Hmmm….didn’t she feed details to her friends to leak?…and as it transpires she was exposed in e-mails of wording the letter to ‘tug at the heartstrings’ if it was made public :shrug:…manipulative to the core.

thesheriff443 07-01-2022 12:18 AM

Harry said, my pregnant wife was suicidal but I was powerless to do anything because at the time I was struggling to find organically farmed salmon

Those where dark days indeed.

Mystic Mock 07-01-2022 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 11127092)
It's her own fault.

But is it really?

From all accounts I just see the Media and the public just ripping her apart for anything (including a miscarriage fgs) the only thing where I can't tell if Meghan was in the wrong is ultimately if her & Kate's feud led to Harry & William to fall out with each other.

But the public & the Media have been the aggressors against H&M every step of the way imo, and until one of those two does something to change my mind on that then I'll defend them and say that it's "not their fault" that this country likes to single people out to harass, but of course everyone else in the country is a saint bar H&M in some people's eyes.

I bet that our Media even prefers some criminals to Meghan, it's become that much of a sickness for them.

Jordan. 07-01-2022 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11127126)
No, I was not. You are mistaken.

Easy to deny when the threads are so often deleted, Princess Pinocchio.

Jordan. 07-01-2022 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11127127)
Tbf we're in a Pandemic.

How many people do you think are donating to Charities full stop at the moment? Let alone specifically H&M's?

Don't try to bring rational thinking into these threads Mock :skull:

Mystic Mock 07-01-2022 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 11127132)
Don't try to bring rational thinking into these threads Mock :skull:

:joker:

In all seriousness though 2021 was the year of irrational opinions, we need 2022 to be an improvement on that.:laugh:

jet 07-01-2022 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11127124)
Well again it was another personal attack against Meghan to try and paint her in a bad light with the letter exchange between Meghan and her Father with no impartiality.

Plus they shouldn't be reporting such personal conversations without the Celeb's permission.

They published the letter at her fathers request after she had given 4 friends permission to reveal parts of it that painted her father in a bad light with no impartiality to People magazine. What Meghan had told them was out of context (as proven in the court documents). Her father asked the MOS that the letter be published to show the proper context.

Meghan should not have revealed personal conversations and lied while doing so to her unsuspecting friends, who took her words at face value, right?

Mystic Mock 07-01-2022 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11127134)
They published the letter at her fathers request after she had given 4 friends permission to reveal parts of it that painted her father in a bad light with no impartiality to People magazine. What Meghan had told them was out of context (as proven in the court documents). Her father asked the MOS that the letter be published to show the proper context.

Meghan should not have revealed personal conversations and lied while doing so to her unsuspecting friends, who took her words at face value, right?

Obviously any wrongdoing from Meghan in this case isn't right, but the DM did lose the case so the Courts have also taken issue with the way they conducted their "investigation."

thesheriff443 07-01-2022 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 11127131)
Easy to deny when the threads are so often deleted, Princess Pinocchio.

That’s the name given to your queen
A compulsive liar

Jordan. 07-01-2022 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11127135)
Obviously any wrongdoing from Meghan in this case isn't right, but the DM did lose the case so the Courts have also taken issue with the way they conducted their "investigation."

Yep the court rightfully ruled it wrong and unlawful. Some people must think crying till they are blue in the face about it is gonna change the fact.

jet 07-01-2022 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 11127131)
Easy to deny when the threads are so often deleted, Princess Pinocchio.

You are wrong, but its easy to accuse when threads are so often deleted. 'Broke' is not a word I'd associate with the super - privelged Princess Pinocchio and Hurrah Harry, courtesy of leeching off their Royal titles.

"Titles mean nothing" - Princess Pinocchio on Oprah. 2021. :laugh:

thesheriff443 07-01-2022 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11127135)
Obviously any wrongdoing from Meghan in this case isn't right, but the DM did lose the case so the Courts have also taken issue with the way they conducted their "investigation."

Mock give me your opinion on this,

Harry sits in a police interview room and the detective says to Harry you said in your statement when Meghan told you she was suicidal you said you felt to ashamed to as for help, Harry says yes I did

Detective then asks, how is this possible that you should feel like that when

You yourself have had therapy your brother has had therapy you and your brother and sister in law have not only spoken publicly about the need to speak openly about mental health and seek help but you represent a mental health charity

Do you believe Harry is telling the truth?

jet 07-01-2022 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11127135)
Obviously any wrongdoing from Meghan in this case isn't right, but the DM did lose the case so the Courts have also taken issue with the way they conducted their "investigation."

It was nothing to do with the way they conducted any investigation - there was no 'investigation' by them?? - the MOS (not the DM) simply published the letter in full instead of just the relevant parts which would have shown Meghan had deceived by not giving the proper context.
The MOS lost because publishing the non - relevant parts was a breach of privacy and is currently unlawful. It was as simple as that.

jet 07-01-2022 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11127127)
Tbf we're in a Pandemic.

How many people do you think are donating to Charities full stop at the moment? Let alone specifically H&M's?

Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's charity - total for the year to 31 December 2020 was £11.8m, an increase of 77% on 2019 (£6.7m).

The Telegraph.

2020 was the worst year of the pandemic.

Mystic Mock 07-01-2022 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesheriff443 (Post 11127142)
Mock give me your opinion on this,

Harry sits in a police interview room and the detective says to Harry you said in your statement when Meghan told you she was suicidal you said you felt to ashamed to as for help, Harry says yes I did

Detective then asks, how is this possible that you should feel like that when

You yourself have had therapy your brother has had therapy you and your brother and sister in law have not only spoken publicly about the need to speak openly about mental health and seek help but you represent a mental health charity

Do you believe Harry is telling the truth?

Tbh I have no idea if Harry is telling the truth or not about what he was thinking at that precise moment in time.

But let's go with the theory that H&M were bull****ting about their mental health at the time, does it automatically make it okay for them to be more hounded by the Media and the public than actual criminals?

Mystic Mock 07-01-2022 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11127160)
Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's charity - total for the year to 31 December 2020 was £11.8m, an increase of 77% on 2019 (£6.7m).

The Telegraph.

2020 was the worst year of the pandemic.

2020 may have been worse for the Pandemic, but it's still a huge problem two years later.

thesheriff443 07-01-2022 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11127163)
Tbh I have no idea if Harry is telling the truth or not about what he was thinking at that precise moment in time.

But let's go with the theory that H&M were bull****ting about their mental health at the time, does it automatically make it okay for them to be more hounded by the Media and the public than actual criminals?

They are not hounded mock, more than criminals there has always been great interest in the royals

The press are there in the good times and the bad times

They have constantly told lies or manipulated the truth to suit their agenda, they preach about we need to save the planet while using private jets

People won’t be taken for fools .

joeysteele 07-01-2022 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11127130)
But is it really?

From all accounts I just see the Media and the public just ripping her apart for anything (including a miscarriage fgs) the only thing where I can't tell if Meghan was in the wrong is ultimately if her & Kate's feud led to Harry & William to fall out with each other.

But the public & the Media have been the aggressors against H&M every step of the way imo, and until one of those two does something to change my mind on that then I'll defend them and say that it's "not their fault" that this country likes to single people out to harass, but of course everyone else in the country is a saint bar H&M in some people's eyes.

I bet that our Media even prefers some criminals to Meghan, it's become that much of a sickness for them.

I obviously have to agree with all you say above.

I have never, not just on this, ever had any liking for the ' Mail publications.
Across near all issues.
I wouldn't believe much in it as it operates from whatever its agenda is to issues or people rather than truth and facts, in my opinion.
Why people spend hundreds of pounds a year on this publication and indeed other so called news publications, is a mystery to me.
However they do, so fine, hundreds of pounds a year thrown into recycling bins.

I rarely comment on these threads, there's in my view no point.
As views are too entrenched.

However when there has been a clear, decision and ruling from the Courts, that the Duchess of Sussex is and was right, also justified to bring this action.
With the Mail being told repeatedly they were and are in the WRONG.

Then even that the victory won is picked at with near derision of their child's charity they set up and on about their finances.

This was likely never about money, this was from what she saw as a part of the media launching personal attacks on herself and her privacy.
It led to her determination to fight back, which she has and where she has WON all through too even against the further appeals of the gutter trash Mail.

That is the real victory, not finance.
In my opinion only of course.

She took on one of the so called rotten big boys of the media and she has come out on top.
I repeat I applaud anyone who takes on our disgraceful so called press.
Even moreso when they win too.

Your second full paragraph I agree with fully too.
The Sussexes mean nothing to me.
I don't know them, they will never affect my life.
It's only on here I come across anything about them.

The threads all go the same way on them, so I rarely comment.
However as I said, anyone defeating fully, any of the gutter trash press of the UK.
That for me is a great thing to learn about.

The Mail being for me, one of the worst for misrepresentation and true gutter like reporting.
It's one of, IF not now the worst of all of them.
So sorry, articles from the Mail for me, I've not a scrap of time for.

jet 07-01-2022 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11127163)
Tbh I have no idea if Harry is telling the truth or not about what he was thinking at that precise moment in time.

But let's go with the theory that H&M were bull****ting about their mental health at the time, does it automatically make it okay for them to be more hounded by the Media and the public than actual criminals?

Actions have consequences.
Criminals are fined or imprisoned for many reasons.
H&M are ridiculed for many reasons.

Like Sheriff said, there will always be interest in the Royals. The ‘new generation’, the sons of Princess Diana and their wives are especially always going to be closely scrutinised. Meghan and Harry's attention seeking when they said they wanted a more private life, their outright lies, hypocrisies, manipulations, deceptions, pity partying etc lead to them being ridiculed.
Those in the public who don't have much interest in the Royals don't know the half of their devious shenanigans so don't understand peoples disdain of their actions.

To get good press and goodwill, being decent, sincere, honest people would work. :hee:

jet 07-01-2022 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 11127186)
The Mail being for me, one of the worst for misrepresentation and true gutter like reporting.
It's one of, IF not now the worst of all of them.
So sorry, articles from the Mail for me, I've not a scrap of time for.

You spend plenty of time moaning about the Mail. Stop reading it? :laugh:

joeysteele 07-01-2022 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11127202)
You spend plenty of time moaning about the Mail. Stop reading it? :laugh:

I never do.
I ONLY come across it on here when you for one post it's articles.

I wouldn't pick my dog's mess up with it.

Plus I moan about ALL the so called ,' news' papers.
I've no time for any of them.
Not one.
I buy and read NONE.

However on here it's hard to avoid seeing trash from the Mail and to a lesser degree other publications.
When it's used as possibly like gospel.

jet 07-01-2022 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 11127203)
I never do.
I ONLY come across it on here when you for one post it's articles.

I wouldn't pick my dog's mess up with it.

Plus I moan about ALL the so called ,' news' papers.
I've no time for any of them.
Not one.
I buy and read NONE.

However on here it's hard to avoid seeing trash from the Mail and to a lesser degree other publications.
When it's used as possibly like gospel.

I post articles from the Mail, the Times and the Telegraph, and people are free to make up their own minds/investigate further the validity of the stories like many do/ or not read them at all....:shrug:

Crimson Dynamo 07-01-2022 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 11127207)
I post articles from the Mail, the Times and the Telegraph, and people are free to make up their own minds/investigate further the validity of the stories like many do/ or not read them at all....:shrug:

quite right Jet

no one has to read them if they dont want to:laugh:

rusticgal 07-01-2022 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11127130)
But is it really?

From all accounts I just see the Media and the public just ripping her apart for anything (including a miscarriage fgs) the only thing where I can't tell if Meghan was in the wrong is ultimately if her & Kate's feud led to Harry & William to fall out with each other.

But the public & the Media have been the aggressors against H&M every step of the way imo, and until one of those two does something to change my mind on that then I'll defend them and say that it's "not their fault" that this country likes to single people out to harass, but of course everyone else in the country is a saint bar H&M in some people's eyes.

I bet that our Media even prefers some criminals to Meghan, it's become that much of a sickness for them.


People seem to forget that the public welcomed and liked Meghan when she came on the scene....look at the crowds that poured out for their wedding and watched it on television. She had a lot of good press and very little negativity (which will always come with the territory). People used to love Harry....
They are where they are now because of their lies and manipulation. At least 2/3 of the country no longer like them and its not all based on what is reported in the press... The Oprah dramatics where most of their accusations have been proven to be lies....the hypocritical preachings.. People can see it with their own eyes....you dont need to read a Newspaper.

jet 07-01-2022 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11127213)
quite right Jet

no one has to read them if they dont want to:laugh:

Exactly. :thumbs:


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.