It could be construed as inappropriate for a potential future prime minister


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

That was at a christening

:)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Police reassess decision not to investigate Angela Rayner allegations
 

The idea that she wasn’t trying to either get Boris’s attention or simply distract him when she was crossing / uncrossing her legs ( session after session) directly opposite a lecherous guy like Boris is kinda cute


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

As I said I don’t care for her ..

It’s a free country if you hadn’t noticed


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I remember my old boss years ago saying to me, "no-one has any respect for someone wearing a suit these days" .... This thread very much reminds me of that

Considering Johnson wandered round with his shirt out his trousers.
Hair like a badly made bird nest.
She looks very smart.

However being fair to Johnson here, on the issue of the accusation of her trying to distract him.

He himself categorically stated, that he disagreed with a lot Raynor stood for, HOWEVER he respected her as a parliamentarian and abhorred the misogyny being directed at her on this matter.

So he thought it utter nonsense too.

Your problem should be with said lecherous guy potentially getting overly distracted by a woman wearing a skirt to work, than the women wearing a skirt to work, which is completely normal

Police reassess decision not to investigate Angela Rayner allegations
 

It was presumably a bit of both … so they’re both equally culpable.

Everyone knows what Boris is like both she’s hardly a flamin’ angel ffs

Five minutes on Google shows she’s spent the last 15 years getting her legs out at any and every photo opportunity .




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[QUOTE=Zizu;11435121]It was presumably a bit of both … so they’re both equally culpable.

Everyone knows what Boris is like both she’s hardly a flamin’ angel ffs

Five minutes on Google shows she’s spent the last 15 years getting her legs out at any and every photo opportunity .

And what’s wrong with a woman getting her legs out!
You are a hypocrite because if it’s someone you fancy you lap it up

Poor Angela.
She can’t do right for doing wrong.
Nothing wrong with her dress sense, we live in the 21st Century, not the 1800’s

As if Boris did not have enough to deal with what with COVID, he did not need legs and co flashing her pins at him and falling out her dress

IV seen a couple of pics of her ample cleavage and does she not know Boris has a charming young wife??

Police reassess decision not to investigate Angela Rayner allegations
 

[QUOTE=thesheriff443;11435125]
It’s all about basic , acceptable standards and inappropriate behaviours … it’s not science of the rocket …


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Wearing a skirt to work is not inappropriate

[QUOTE=Zizu;11435130]Thankfully your opinion doesn’t count

Police reassess decision not to investigate Angela Rayner allegations
 

No sh1t Holmes .. bonus marks for missing the main point again though

Are you always this obtuse ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Are you always this misogynistic?

Oh that great avoider of truth, the gutter trash Mail.

She has actually said, she will produce her tax records if the Cons produce all theirs.
Which they won't.

Why anyone follows and takes notice of publications like the Mail or any other so called news papers, mystifies me.

Beats me as to why people are moaning about struggling with cost of living and energy costs.
Yet spend hundreds of pounds a year on ALL the now NON news? papers.
Who mostly print nonsense in the main now.

So much so they'd be better placed on comic or fiction stands

Clearly not given I prefer women over men in just about every conceivable situation..

Football and boxing / MMA the obvious exceptions


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Such a classy broad … fake fur coat , leapard-skin leggings and dock martin boots

Not many can pull that look off ..

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...66ff0fa7ba.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Zizu continues his attacks on how women dress

Woman


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Back on Topic

Raynor refuses to publish her data
of 2010

The person who advised her is dead

So Publish the Bloody Details


Ref: SkyNewsHD, GMBHD itv

…I love that Angela Rayner has her own very definite style identification…to me that shows a strong presence who can hold their own and stand out in a male dominated world of politics and that’s what we would…/…or I would want to see from any politician as a good foundation …in terms of strong women and fashion/style and being an individual leader in their field, Vivienne Westwood is right up there as a British icon and she would have and always did veer from ‘the more traditional’….i personally don’t want my political people to be ‘uniform’, I want to see who they are and feel their individuality because they can be so important to our lives…

…in terms of style as well…Angela is someone very refreshing to me as opposed to having a Prada draped PM that just screams….’I’m pretty much completely of a different species to many of the people I represent’…Rishi wears Prada and apparently the devil does as well…:NOT MY POLITICIAN banner:….

The misogyny and sexism in this thread os astounding. Unbelievable

So she's just a big blinker in general? Because if that's the case it could just be that she's nervous.

Isn't Rayner a sympathetic figure in that scenario?:conf:

Oh I know, those awful post office managers think they can do whatever they like, its disgusting.

Hey! There might be a reason to follow Politics more often.:joker:

You're selling the product, Zizu.:laugh:

I say that we change the clothing etiquette at the House Of Commons.:creep:

I agree.

And I am being serious when I say that btw, no pervy jokes or anything like that.:laugh:

I feel like people should dress how they want to dress, as long as you're at least wearing something anyway.:joker:

Look if she Broke the Law
it will come out.

She knows what she did wrong
in 2010.

If she has done NOTHING WRONG,
simply Publish her 2010 DATA

Well done Mock for lifting the mood on this thread.

I personally agree with Ammi too in what she says.

Blinking in itself is not a sign of lying
It's other mannerisms and hand gestures and movements that more likely indicate people being economical with the truth.

I've a cousin that blinks incessantly when anyone is talking to her .
Always has done.

As for publishing anything, why should she .
Since it's private advice and finances.

If, I stress IF she is found by police or other standards committees to have done wrong
Then that's the time to publish such private documents.

As she says, when the Cons publish all their advice and tax issues freely, then so will she
I won't hold my breath waiting for Cons to do so nor their hard-line supporters expecting them to.

[If, I stress IF she is found by police or other standards committees to have done wrong
Then that's the time to publish such private documents.]

At last,
some Great Words on this thread.

Thanks Joey.:blush:

What evidence are the Tories expecting to find on her that they didn't find the first time?

You're not even attacking her for anything substantive- if you went after her for calling Tories "scum", you might have a point in that she acted in an "unparliamentary manner", and that's better than going on about her clothes.


And for the record, my only problem with her using that word was that she effectively handed a narrative over to the Tories and the gutter-press, and anything else from her speech was basically ignored.

I honestly can’t find one redeeming feature about her … apart from being female of course


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I haven't a clue as it seems there's nothing new from what was known before.

The police decided then there was nothing to investigate as to her directly.
It may well be they reach the same conclusion.

It's a Con MP who reported it to the police, when they refused to investigate.
He made a complaint about their decision.
So they have to look over it again because they have to honour complaints.

The only thing this highlights to me is that across the board a lot of things need simplifying as to MPs affairs with the fullest transparency from the lot of them.

I don't like her, but her achievements in politics have to be admired