Stop generalising. You can still have emotion. Some peolpe just dont cry for people they have never met. No big deal.

How am I generalizing?
Isn't calling someone SAD generalizing? Yep.

It is okay to cry if a celebrity has died or if you met a celebrity. It is okay to cry at entertainment on the television because it might have been designed to make you cry, but to cry because your favourite star ran into a spot of bother is a bit pathetic. Millions of people with millions less money run in to much worse problems everyday. Crying at a celebrity like that also demonstrates a level of obsession that suggests you probably need to get out more in life.

Not crying is fine, but calling people sad for crying is possibly the issue.

No. I did cheer when Charles Bronson died as it won me £76.

You are generalising because you are suggesting people who dont cry at those things you mentioned have no emotions. Easy.

Neither is an issue. Its all about opinion. I can call a certain person pathetic over crying for a certain thing and its my opinion, just like it is their opinion to cry.

Then surely the other person is generalising by saying those that cry are sad? :tongue:

I never, ever said anyhting to the contrary?

Generalisation #1 : People that cry are sad.
Genralisation #2 : People that dont cry are void of emotion. What would you do if a newborn puppy was crushed by a statue of Saddam Hussein in Iraqs poorest villiage? ~ SATAN!

So as you can see, I took issue with what I believed to be the worst of the 2, and the one that conflicted with my own opinion.

Nope. I don't get to attached to any celebs out of what they're doing in media, so naturally I never find out what's been happening anyway.

And I know this sounds mean but I was almost laughing over some things people have cried about lol (No offence :P)

i cried when the spice girls split and when S club split and i know i wont be able to watch Eastenders next week when Wellard(the dog) dies ..........................but thats it i think!?!?:bawling: