No thats your deliberate misinterpretation of whats been said
They didnt dictate, but they may have managed to subdue, avoid, stall etc the media and the language barrier assisted in this

if anyone knows how to lie and cover things up its corrupt doctors and specialists. with some of them its become 1 of the main parts of their job description

There was no fingerprints from anyone else on the window though apart from Kates.

(According to numerous websites online)

But wouldn't a child abductor be very likely to wear gloves?

So I have deliberately misinterpreted it, but your argument is that they "may" have been able to stall it because of the language barrier? If I was a criminal, I'd move to Portugal. Seems like you only have to talk in English, but really slowly and in a portuguese accent that you "no comprende whata they a sayina'" and you're home free.

That is completely baseless.

And also, I do not believe that Kate's would have been the only fingerprints on a window used by hundreds of holidaymakers.

I have no idea

They didn't admit to doing it AFTER Maddie vanished. Did you watch the show?

I read numerous times on those different sites (the links that have been posted) that the only fingerprints found on the window/frame were Kates and the window had recently been washed too.

Not got a clue how they would find out about the washing of it but yeah that's what I read.

I assumed the only fingerprints that could be identified were Kate's.

So, hers were the only prints full stop?

I'm trying to find the part I read about the fingerprints, you could well be right though.

It's all splitting hairs... They're guilty of causing her death no matter what happened that night.

Let's imagine a child DID die in an accident after being left by their parents, alone, in a holiday appartment, after the children had clearly been distressed the previous night, and even if they reported it there and then.

Would they be regarded as innocent victims, or even applauded as heroes as the McCanns have been at times? Or would they RIGHTLY face the heat publicly and possibly even legally, for blatant careless neglect causing the death of their child?

I strongly suspect the latter.

That in mind - let's sat its exactly as they say. She didn't have an accident, instead, an abductor broke in, took her, and killed her or worse. Why is the response any different? Why does it matter WHAT happened to her? Why isn't it, in fact, even worse?

They are guilty as sin, whether it's a covered up accident or an abduction, and it's a bloody tragedy that from some people, they probably get more sympathy than the poor girl herself.

Now, you can say "they've suffered enough by losing her, imagine how they must feel, they're deserving if public sympathy" and all I can say in response is... I have a 3 and a half year old girl. If my careless, selfish, ridiculously neglectful actions lead to her death I would not WANT any sympathy, from anyone. I would want the worst that the world could throw at me.

http://themaddiecasefiles.com/topic111.html

Hmm. Cant believe I have never checked for other peoples statements tbh. Seems some of the restaurant employees make the timeline shorter than the Tapas 9 do. Child discovered missing at around 9.30 and the search began

(Checking the first line of each statement takes you to the PJ released files, so the statements seem to be real)

Edit. That does kind of fit in with a statement I read at one point a while ago, in which apparently the witness heard someone shouting 'Madeleine, madeleine' at about 9.30. Will try to find it

Where are they asking for sympathy?

The interviews are pleas for information so the mystery of where Maddie is can be solved.

At what point should this become the case?

Like say a child dies when their parent is in the bath, or while their having dinner out in their garden, or if they pop next door for a few minutes to borrow something, are the parents responsible for the death in all of these cases?

When they leave their distressed children completely alone for hours on end, in a foreign country, so that they can go out for drinks with their buddies.

Pretending that this is acceptable parenting, or comparable to popping out for a few minutes, is utter madness.

It wasn't for hours on end though, they were checking every half hour, I know you will say that they did do it for hours in previous nights but the fact that it happened on the night they never went half an hour without checking them shows that this can happen at any time or at any point when you leave your children unattended, even just for a few minutes

god, you have got it bad!

you cant do enough to make them out to be monsters,

they where not distressed when they left them, foreign country, yes a holiday resort, not war torn country.

it was not an 18 to 30 holiday and they where getting smashed every night.

how many parents are drunk or on drugs at night while in charge of their kids?
bloody thousands!

They're not monsters, they're just the same typically self-involved parents that embody the attitude of the entire western world. That doesn't make it any less neglectful (they have admitted themselves that Madeleine asked where they were the night before as thy were crying, they were distressed, and these "parents" were aware of that).

Leaving your kids alone to go OUT with friends is not bloody OK! and the fact that "loads of other people do it" doesn'take it any better, it only makes it more depressing.

No, they weren't BUT they had been distressed enough the night before to mention it to the parents on the morning. I don't think they're monsters but they were selfish and neglectful.

Also to add, anyone who would leave toddlers out of sight AND SOUND of a supervising adult even for a few minutes, is being careless. Yes you can go to the toilet, go upstairs, go for a shower, but you can always at least hear them if they need you.

I also don't understand the "where do you draw the line" argument? Why not argue that the other way? Accidents can happen in only a few moments, so why not throw caution to the wind and go to work leaving them? Leave them a sandwich and some water, they'll probably be fine.

Yes and when these things do happen the parents who are negligent are hauled over the coals as a rule... except now.
It's not always enough to say they have suffered enough.
The case they have brought against the detective is not beneficial to the case is it?

[QUOTE=the truth;6434537]Agreed and they did it for years BEFORE AND AFTER THIS TRAGEDY
SO DID THEIR FRIENDS

I will ask you again did they confirm this in the Crimewatch programme, because if they didn't this is yet another example of hysterical reporting of facts that are not facts at all.

The fact the British government personally intervened on the behalf of the McCanns and their personal connections to Tony Blair and Gordon Brown makes me believe even more than while they may not necessarily be guilty of her accidental death and subsequent cover up; there is certainly some kind of sinister government involvement in all of this that wouldn't be the case if they were a family of street cleaners who went down to the pub and left their three children home alone.

Quite simply, they've been given special treatment because they were affluent white doctors in a foreign country and their little girl has a cute face. That's why it's become a media fixture and that's why they've been given special treatment. I believe them to be guilty of negligence regardless of what actually happened to Madeleine and I think it's shocking they've not been fined, if not jailed for the amount of police time, energy and money they've wasted on this case. It's not going to be solved unless Madeleine escapes or the person responsible comes forward - whether that's an abductor, or one of the McCanns themselves. Truly depressing. It's been six years, no one has any information, they should accept this and just hope that they'll have good news one day. People aren't going to remember something after 6 years that they didn't already know.

Apparently Ben Needhams father is kicking off saying why hasn't his son had the same amount of attention as Madeleine. Valid question IMO.

Edit. Seems to be his grandfather.. http://www.itv.com/news/calendar/upd...vernment-help/