Wow I'm very perched to read!

Lotan has to be last or I'm leaving the forum.

I'm afraid he won

(I assume we're playing by Pointless rules and the fewest points wins, yes?)

HOWLING my fanny off at this omh
http://i.imgur.com/AxRJKT6.gif

when you become so determined to stick to your shtick that you're willing to overlook two actually threatening ejectees because they "provide to the series" or w/e your lame ass comes up with every time

Hello police yes I'd like to report a murder

that came off harsher than i intended

i'm tired ok i apologise

*redirects this mood towards BB16 Joel*

****ING RENT BOY

When someone's pretty much insinuating "Lotan > Isabelle", one can never be too harsh

I'm especially confused by the defense of Kayleigh though. And not just because I put her last. She was aaaaaawful from start to finish and barely even featured in many episodes so can't, surely, have the "providing to the series" card played whenever she's brought up? She was just nasty.

Like I can understand the Lotan defence because production pretty much guaranteed he was the focus of all episodes between weeks 2 and 4 - for better or worse. (worse.)

She... made Chanelle look even better than she already did? idk I got nothing

Yes my eight-year long argument about the value of certain housemates over others is just 'schtick', I don't actually believe or mean what I say, I do it for effect and write several hundred posts on the matter each series because I love being part of an ever increasing minority! As for the ejectees...you are aware that I'm not much a fan of the way this production team run the show, aren't you? And that includes their stirring up of drama, only to then interfere immediately and be trigger-happy when it comes to warnings and ejections? I know there's many people on this forum who relish scouring the latest housemates' Twitter profiles in the hope that they'll be ejected for some homophobic joke they made six years ago, but I'm not one of them

I didn't agree with Lotan's ejection and wouldn't have agreed with Kayleigh's had it not been for her DR outburst. I've already conceded she's vile btw but I noticed you conveniently ignored that! There are many things Chanelle did that could've been ejection worthy but she's revered on here (myself included) so why would I care about a few aggressive arguments that I wasn't involved in? Anyway...not that I've seen the series but isn't BB5's Emma (an ejectee involved in the most infamous fight in BBUK history!) near universally loved on this forum? I'll remember this post the next time I see someone praise her

As for the insult, it's nice to see that people take this show and other people's opinions on it so seriously xx

I think Kayleigh's talking point was saying the c-word a lot? That's the best I got.

Meanwhile Charlotte's was...

...

...something about a cupboard? idk

:shrug:

Kayleigh was trash, time to face facts and face reality.

Good thing nobody's defending Charlotte either then isn't it

I fixed that for you. A bit more 'realistic' now

A trash person and a trash housemate also

wow it's almost like it's possible to acknowledge the shortcomings of A Loud Housemate like Kayleigh and an inert one like Charlotte

Kayleigh was just a bore with an annoying accent tbh

Is that so?

And it's less about defending and more about helping her to 35th in this ranking above the aforementioned names...which is what my original (flippant :rolleyes:) point was in the first place

Literally yes

never has =/= been more appropriate

Yes it's that possible that she was 35th in this ranking! Which by my calculations is at least fifteen places too high...that's sure acknowledging her shortcomings :joker:

Her accent was probably the best thing about her

Well, no, because even if the post was mainly one criticising three housemates, the phrases 'why should they beat' x, y and z because 'they were nice enough' is enough of a defence of the others rankings to me