Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 11296041)

GBN news with the infamous Dan Wootten been covering the story since 9pm with an interview with Eamonn Holmes on in a few minutes…:hehe:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11296049)

Andrew actually sexually assaulted a woman did he not?

did he?

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11296053)

Well there was an allegation which cost the Queen £12m…

An allegation one more than in this case. To compare them is ridiculous

Originally Posted by UserSince2005 (Post 11296056)

If you don’t think Phil groomed that child
Then you think that child prostituted himself for free meals and a job.

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 11296047)

Andrew actually sexually assaulted a woman did he not? As there has been no mention of sexual assault and contrary to everyone’s opinions, Phil had a consensual relationship. Do I agree that he cheated on his wife and lied, No. do I believe he groomed him because he had ulterior motives, also no.

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy (Post 11295752)

Glenn's stance is that it's OK to plant seeds in young lads so long as you wait until the fruit is ripe before you stick your cock in it. It's legal arista. Legal.

Originally Posted by Kate! (Post 11296088)

Glenn is blind, must be. Or selectively so. Why the Phillip bias him and Liam have?

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy (Post 11295791)

Can you IMAGINE the reaction if Piers Morgan had met a 10 year old through ITV, slid into her DM's at 15 and started a sexual relationship with her at 16-18?

Please Liam and Glenn, please try to argue that you'd take a "wait and see if he broke the law before judging" approach if that was the situation.

I think it's fairly obvious that you'd be all over it as soon as there was a sniff of inappropriate behaviour.

You both PROVABLY have no problem calling out Prince Andrew for his actions with teenage girls.

Why are you picking up the shields and going on the march for Philip?

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11296096)

Tbf to Glenn there have been people on the Internet accusing Phillip Schofield of being a Paedophile, which I think Glenn is objecting to, which I can understand.

Personally though I do think that Phillip's relationship with the teen should be thoroughly investigated, just to put it to rest once and for all on if he is an out and out Nonce, or if he has blurred the lines, but isn't technically doing anything illegal.

Originally Posted by arista (Post 11296097)

Yes Gays protect
other gays.

Problem is though, Kate
Phillip Schofield is a Paedophile

The Clock is Ticking...........

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 11295921)

And, the 'People are out to get me' that posted on Insta was completely tone deaf by Schofield. He deserves this cuz he's behaving very arrogantly given the circumstances

Originally Posted by Kate! (Post 11296100)

He's objecting to those of us who do think Schofield is a groomer and a nonce. Says we've nothing to go on. Why then did both Schofield and Matthew lie their heads off to cover it all up?

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11296104)

I'm also suspicious of Schofield for a few different reasons.

But tbf Glenn is right that it's speculation based on circumstantial evidence rather than out and out proof that he is a Nonce.

And I don't know if he meets the definition of a Groomer, so I'll leave that to the intellectuals.

Originally Posted by Kate! (Post 11296106)

But how is it circumstantial? Glenn's just playing devil's advocate and harping on it ad nauseum. Will he eat his words when the truth comes out?

The FACTS!

Phillip took an interest in Matthew from the age of 10. Got him a job. People have attested that they were a couple.

Matthew posted on social media that he was hurt, and he'd thought him and Schofield were forever.

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 11296109)

Legally speaking we know that Phillip knew him when he was 10, but had sex with him when he was 16 if I'm not mistaken.

Basically if the Police were to start investigating this case, they would need to find evidence of Phillip having sexual relations with the guy before he turned 16, because until then all any of us can do is speculate.

Personally I'm suspicious of Phillip, and I do think that it's weird that he had a sexual relationship with someone that he knew when he was a kid, but I know that my opinion isn't evidence to get Phillip arrested or sentenced.

Originally Posted by Josiah. (Post 11296114)

Can a mod or James close this thread? This is getting out of hand…