telegraph front page at mo

:laugh:

Subtle

I don't think there is any doubt now that it is Huw, and that is the best way to highlight his name without actually accusing him

because its under investigation now


that is why it isn't being mentioned who, for now


for privacy reasons

oops. the accused sent menacing and abusive messages to a young person on a dating app .... he is ****ed

:umm2:

welp
 

BBC presenter sent abusive and menacing messages to second young person

A young person has told BBC News they felt threatened by the BBC presenter at the centre of a row over payment for sexually explicit photos.

The individual in their early 20s was first contacted anonymously by the male presenter on a dating app.

They say they were put under pressure to meet up but never did.

When the young person hinted online they might name the presenter, they were sent abusive, expletive-filled messages.

Speaking to BBC News, the young person - who has no connection to the person at the centre of the Sun's story about payments for photos - said they had been scared by the power the presenter held.

They said the threats made in the messages had frightened them - and they remain scared.

The new allegations of menacing and bullying behaviour by the high-profile presenter raise fresh questions about his conduct.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-66165766

how many others has he done it to and the BBC tried to cover it up ...... again

its most definitely in the public interest for him to be named now

bbc news have verified that the phone number used to send the messages belongs to the tv presenter :skull:

Hes a daddy, its his job to dominate and control.

Oh deary deary deary

He'll be dominating a dole queue soon hopefully.

so he is a closet gay or bi or what ...:skull:

:joker:

There is no way back for him now and it is time the Beeb stopped protecting him

yeah, they have to name him now

the staggering arrogance of the man that he felt he would never be outed....hats off the the parents who took this all the way and didn't give up on their child who will thank them when they come to their senses

the reason it's important to name him now is because once named, many others may come foreword

Not sure how many kids with a £12k a year drug habit ever fully come to their senses unfortunately Cherie.

Furious BBC staff have accused bosses of protecting the high-profile presenter at the centre of an alleged sex scandal.

*They claimed the man in question is friendly with management and suggested that executives had failed to take the matter seriously.

*“We are all so sick and tired that these people are protecting their friend at the expense of the integrity of the BBC,” said one staff member.

*“We are really, really worried about this mess. Obviously everyone knows who the presenter is and, as ever, the bosses are keeping us all in the dark about the plans.

*“We’ve had young runners, apprentices and vulnerable guests around this man and now we don’t know who has been exposed to what. The presenter in question is very in with the management… it’s all just awful that they put us and our colleagues at risk to save themselves and their friend.”

*Staff were further angered when bosses came into the office over the weekend after the story broke. *

One said: “They were audibly moaning about missing out on time with their kids and watching the cricket. They sat in a conference room getting lunch and ice creams delivered.”


https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainm...2ebc1d2f&ei=18

I just don't understand how these people think they can get away with it....

yeah, and the bbc boss was obviously fudging in his responses. They haven't learnt their lessons from the past

*They sat in a conference room getting lunch and ice creams delivered.


:skull:

the moral was shockingly low after the job cuts and they haven't recovered from that yet

1 in 6 people in the UK know the presenters identity, and that number grows all the time :laugh:

If you don't understand that, have a look at how the BBC is helping him ... *checks notes* ... get away with it?

Yes Title
needs "Two" teens,

now the


Dirty Bugger BBC Worker
has more under his belt

Can we not just get rid of the BBC yet? What value is it that it's supposedly offering again? Some folk like the radio shows on their commute or something? :umm2:

Sell the valuable IPs like Doctor Who and stuff to other channels and dissolve the damn thing.