http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content...3/15901888.jpg


http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content...3/15901887.jpg

http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content...3/15901907.jpg

Here we go again

And quite rightly too.
As last time, the police don't seem to have released the name but the press have published both name and photos. Makes a mockery again of 'innocent until proved guilty.'
I found this spoof rather amusing but don't read it unless you can tolerate black humour
http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.c...=s1i89988#this

Yes. After the "eccentric" landlord we have the "quiet" Dutchman.

I wonder if we'll end up with enough characters for a game of Cluedo?

Bloody hell, someones touchy

:conf::conf::conf:

The above post seemed a little touchy and defensive of the alleged accused

I can't abide tabloids nor have any opinion really about this case at present as I don't know enough about it (and I may have misread the context of said above post) but it seemed touchy

Which post? (My settings show your post as being the 'last' one). I can't see any recent posts that seems 'a little touchy', and none that would warrant a 'bloody hell, someones touchy' reply. So I'm still :conf: and in the dark !!!

CarriKP's posts. As I say, I probably have read them out of context

I honestly think it's perhaps the way you've read it (maybe not mind you, but I don't think so). I read it as CarriKP was agreeing that it was best the police be wary of releasing info after the way the press jumped all over CJ - then Carri showed the way the press seem to be going down a similar line with a person that the police have not yet even named or confirmed to be the man all over the papers - an unnamed man not yet chraged/found guilty (which tbh, is fair comment given that some people have since the start, had CJ 'hung, drawn and quartered' without the man even being charged).

I think their Cluedo reference was showing a certain disdain through humour for the press now going to town with their 'labelling headlines', putting up pictures/details on this as yet, unnamed man (although given his employers are directing all enquires about this gentleman to A&S police, even Inspector Clouseau could work it out) - when although a suspect, the man hasn't yet been charged of anything and could be an innocent party. (Though I suspect that after the CJ situ, the police may have more tangible reasons for this arrest). We will soon find out!!

Again, I clearly may have read out of context and do NOT agree with tabloid speculation.

Yep, you'd think they'd wait a few days to see the outcome of the arrest before plastering pictures / family details all over the place. I'm all for freedom of information but at least wait until some credible information is released from the police. For all we know, this could be another CJ situation.

Surely the first thing they would have done is search all the flats in Jo's block, ESPECIALLY the next door neighbour? If not, what do they think they will find now after almost a month?

One would have thought so - especially when the did CJ, and had invovlement with the other neighbour - the chap whose car was taken away. They've certainly given this guy a month to clear up if he was invovled.

You are right there are some very defensive posts on here concerning all of the suspects. If you read back you will see. I wonder why.

Yes good one.


In his Flat there is something that connects him.


I think he is the one.

If that is true then the Police are remiss in not having searched ALL the neighbours' flats immediately Jo went missing - never mind waiting till they found a body. They won't find anything now.

Interesting too that he is an architect with close links to the company Joanna worked for, his girlfriend is very similar looking to Joanna and his particular field of expertise is as a people flow analyst.

If only life were that simple.

The police are bound by the very laws they uphold, they cant just search someones property without evidence, if the evidence is only a vague suspicion of a crime having been committed in a property there are certain procedures they have to follow.

In the event of the property owner not being available to give permission for a search they would have needed to obtain a warrant, in which case they have to prove to a senior officer that they had good reason to search.

I note in some reports it says the man had just returned from holiday, they may have needed to speak to him again to confirm something he had possibly already told him, prior to launching a full scale forensic search of his pad.

Due to the high profile of the case and the ever present presence of the media they will have been conducting this investigation by the book.

Police said he had an unusual picture on his website , long shadow is there a clue here.?

That's actually a good point, and I recall I also read a report saying that he had been on holiday. Additionally, I read that he hadn't been staying in the flat because of everything that had been going on.

You could be wrong there
as the First search was nothing like this Tech Team.

Very true, a preliminary search when someone goes missing will simply look for signs of a possible crime scene, evidence of a struggle, time manpower and financial resources limit it them to no more than a cursory look over.

However now they are able to zero in on possible crime scenes forensic team searches can find traces of blood invisible to the eye, even after it has been cleaned up.

Also carpets upholstery etc will be subject to trace searches, where the minutest traces of substances will be examined microscopically.

Its also a good sign to see the investigation team have applied for and been granted extra time to question Tabak.

So it seems it was Tabak's girlfriend that tipped the police off - the plot thickens!

They have until the end of the day to question him

Hmm, Tabak and his girlfriend split up in September and he was living alone. She bears a striking resemblance to Joanna. The landlord spoke to Tabak that evening telling him about Greg's difficulty in starting his car, so he would have known Joanna would be alone. Two separate people heard a woman scream "help me" around 9 pm on 17th coming from the direction of his flat. All pretty circumstantial at the moment, but adding up.

Which begs the question: was it Joanna that the CJ actually saw on Friday 17th - or was it Tabak's girlfriend?.......