ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   The EU - Referendum - 23rd of June 2016 - in or out? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=275255)

arista 06-03-2016 11:07 AM

Love Boris AM
on Marr telling him to Stop the BBC Claptrap

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...7265133631.jpg

Kizzy 06-03-2016 11:12 AM

What Joey said.

DemolitionRed 06-03-2016 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 8547233)
Good gracious the insults fly on this thread at times,totally unnecessary.
There are misleading statements coming from all sides in this from the Politicians the in camp and the out camp.

People have the right to feel strongly for in or out without getting insulted for goodness sake.
There is no need for attacks as to political leanings or words like ****** to be used to make any points.

Honestly,it is ridiculous,the 'in' camp only need to point out how things are now,the securities, the success and the stronger we likely are in the EU, despite its many and I mean many failings.
The 'out' camp instead of attacking people as being on the left or otherwise,all they need to do is avoid all that and explain in full with 'substantiation of same', what the UK would be like out of the EU.

Instead of going on about old arguments, that are null and void that is what people undecided need to know from the out camp.
Just to make my point as to old arguments.

I agree with Kirk that the Conservative govt in the early 70s took us into Europe without asking the voters.
I agree that was wrong.

It happened however and had they not,then Harold Wilson and Labour would have likely done so after 1974.
The polling Kirk stated, had a healthy vote against going into Europe,then as now the polls are meaningless since after only 2 years in Europe and even a re-negotiation of sorts already needed to be done, the Nation voted by almost 2 to 1 to 'stay in',in Labour's referendum on the issue.

I was talking to 4 people who are totally undecided and are sick of the whole thing already.They listen to both sides and are getting no info as to what the really need to make a decision.
They have stopped listening to UKIP as they say all they go on about is immigration.

They want the picture, as near guaranteed picture as should be possible, if things are true and right from the out camp, as to the future of the UK out of the EU.
Nothing has been given as to such assurances so the likelihood for them is to stay with what they know for sure now in the EU.

If all the out camp are going to do is insult others of a different view and political leaning to them, then they will lose the argument bigtime.

I cannot say what the UK would be like out of the EU because I have seen and heard nothing to convince of any claims being right.
Statistics mean nothing, we know a good number of the EU statistics, statistics can say whatever a particular viewpoint wants then to say.
I don't know who said it but is was once said, there were 'lies,damned lies and statistics'.
Or words to that effect.

To change over from something, people have to be assured the change they are making is for the better of all and Country,if that cannot be shown and substantiated with right and true facts,then for me change is best avoided.
We have been in Europe for over 40 years now as a partner in this process.
If David Cameron is to be believed he has got in his deal, a fact of no further political union by the UK in the EU.

If the out camp can prove him wrong on that,do so if not then he should be afforded the benefit of the doubt on it since he did the re-negotiation.
Those in his party attacking and insulting him from 'the' out side, make the whole issue look ugly and they also paint a very bad picture indeed of being out of the EU too by that nonsense.
he is presenting his deal to the voters,he believes he did his very best and got the best he could.
I cannot bear the man but on this I applaud his work on this issue and believe him right.

I also do believe fully, that he has started a chain of events in the EU that will surface as more change within the EU is demanded now in light of what he has begun.
That for me is another reason why I will be voting to stay put and take no risks whatsoever.

:clap1:

MTVN 06-03-2016 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 8550768)
Love Boris AM
on Marr telling him to Stop the BBC Claptrap

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/...7265133631.jpg

Very poor performance from Boris, just waffling on without giving any clear answers or making any clear points

Kizzy 06-03-2016 12:40 PM

So what's new?...

joeysteele 06-03-2016 01:15 PM

Boris should be on more often if he performs the way he did this morning, really badly and came across very arrogant and at times ignorant too.

Looking to the floor when asked about ambitions to take over from Cameron was a very telling moment too.

Nothing much endearing at all as to his performance on Marr today at all for me and for sure no real concrete facts as to life outside the EU,in fact he seemed to be waffling most of the time.

Alf 06-03-2016 01:22 PM

The Head of British Chambers of Commerce suspended for saying we'd be better off out of EU.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...ow-reports-say

arista 06-03-2016 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 8550815)
So what's new?...


The British Chamber of Commerce
sacked there speaker
because he spoke from
a private matter about leaving Europe


He was not speaking about the B.C.C. view.

joeysteele 06-03-2016 01:28 PM

Perhaps the BCC would have been better to have reprimanded him rather than suspension, however they have put themselves in a position of neutrality on the EU issue therefore all connected to it should be held to that.
He spoke out breaking that condition so he asked for it really.

Keeping his views to himself and those around him would have been fine but speaking out publicly is in effect disobeying rules put in place.

Kizzy 06-03-2016 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alf (Post 8550856)
The Head of British Chambers of Commerce suspended for saying we'd be better off out of EU.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...ow-reports-say

He compromised neutrality, he deserved to be suspended.

Kizzy 06-03-2016 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 8550864)
The CBI
sacked there speaker
because he spoke from
a private matter about leaving Europe


He was not speaking about the CBI view.

My comment was a response to the comment about BOJO.

arista 06-03-2016 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 8550869)
My comment was a response to the comment about BOJO.


Yes Marr
kept doing the question muddle

He needed a full 30mins

Alf 06-03-2016 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 8550865)
Perhaps the BCC would have been better to have reprimanded him rather than suspension, however they have put themselves in a position of neutrality on the EU issue therefore all connected to it should be held to that.
He spoke out breaking that condition so he asked for it really.

Keeping his views to himself and those around him would have been fine but speaking out publicly is in effect disobeying rules put in place.

But what of his opinion that we should vote out?

Should we take his opinion as something to think about? or something to be ignored?

joeysteele 06-03-2016 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alf (Post 8550875)
But what of his opinion that we should vote out?

Should we take his opinion as something to think about? or something to be ignored?

Well for me his loyalty and word word be questionable from me personally.
Since he cannot abide by the strict ruling that the BCC demanded of all connected to them,neutrality on the issue, that he would then ignore that,knowing the ruling was made,sorry but for me, he comes out someone and his word not to be trusted.

So I will be ignoring him since again anyway, he made no clear factual substantiated points as to life out of the EU in any event.
Then again,he is among all in the out camp at present in that failing in my opinion.

arista 07-03-2016 11:37 AM

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-992x558.jpg

This is wrong
using public money

DemolitionRed 07-03-2016 07:41 PM

Whilst Boris is sharpening his proverbial knife to stick in the backs of Cameron and Osborne, I look forward to Sadiq Khan slipping into the mayor of London's seat.

Boris thinks he's the next PM and that's the only reason he's positioned himself with the "OUT" side in the EU Referendum. If we remain 'IN' which we probably will, Boris can blame the treachery on Cameron and Osborne and make a pitch for the leadership, which will be backed by the hard right. I doubt Boris wants to be PM if we come 'OUT' as the long years of disengagement from the EU are bound to be very harsh indeed and the Tory seat, after an initial period of right wing euphoria, will become a very uncomfortable place indeed.

joeysteele 07-03-2016 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed (Post 8552825)
Whilst Boris is sharpening his proverbial knife to stick in the backs of Cameron and Osborne, I look forward to Sadiq Khan slipping into the mayor of London's seat.

Boris thinks he's the next PM and that's the only reason he's positioned himself with the "OUT" side in the EU Referendum. If we remain 'IN' which we probably will, Boris can blame the treachery on Cameron and Osborne and make a pitch for the leadership, which will be backed by the hard right. I doubt Boris wants to be PM if we come 'OUT' as the long years of disengagement from the EU are bound to be very harsh indeed and the Tory seat, after an initial period of right wing euphoria, will become a very uncomfortable place indeed.

If as I hope it will, the vote is to remain in the EU.

Then that will put David Cameron into a stronger position having negotiated with the EU and then persuaded more of the UK to support his deal and stay in.
I would very much doubt then, that even the Conservative party at the time of David Cameron resigning as leader,would then elect a leader who had been an 'out' campaigner and therefore an MP who had publicly taken on the then PM Cameron.

If the vote is to stay in,with the issue settled then, it would be of no benefit at all for the UK to have the Conservatives or any other party elect a leader who had wanted out,even more than just electing a leader but a PM too for a time.

If he was willing to throw his hat in the leadership ring when Cameron goes,I would quite like to see Matt Hancock be a surprise candidate for the top job there.

DemolitionRed 07-03-2016 10:12 PM

Sorry Joey but I don't think Cameron's going to be in a stronger position whichever way this vote falls because of the upheaval going on in the Tory right. The present government is split right down the middle and its only going to get worse from here.

joeysteele 08-03-2016 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed (Post 8553003)
Sorry Joey but I don't think Cameron's going to be in a stronger position whichever way this vote falls because of the upheaval going on in the Tory right. The present government is split right down the middle and its only going to get worse from here.

I'd have said that too if he'd had intentions of staying on as leader.
However,if he gets the 'in' result he wants I do think even the Conservative party will overall see him as the stronger and the one who won the arguments.

The Conservative Party has been split since the 90s,odd how it used to ridicule, jeer and laugh a Labour when they were split in the early 80s on Europe.
However despite that split, I doubt they would elect as a successor to Cameron anyone who had gone against him on the EU issue and lost.
In that I think Gove and Johnson have taken a massive risk as I think both would like the job after Cameron.

If the result is an 'in' win however,then as to the important task of electing a leader,which the Conservative party takes very seriously indeed,I doubt the Conservatives would then elect an anti EU campaigner,who was at odds with the EU and indeed and the bulk of voters of the UK too, and I also hope Cameron does take some revenge on those Ministers who have set out to totally discredit him as leader and PM on this issue.

DemolitionRed 08-03-2016 09:18 AM

Cameron will be blamed for bringing this about in the first place. I believe he's damned if we do and damned if we don't. The conservative party are tearing themselves apart and are now so viscerally divided that its become an open and very public warfare. The awkwardness is not going to go away any time soon.

I know a good few conservatives who are considering the out vote atm. The only thing that's stopping them (the ones I know) is this bandwaggon of petty nationalists and xenophobics that are riding at the front of the 'OUT' chariot. I had a very interesting conversation with a conservative friend of mine regarding what he thought about the present party divide and he told me that a lot of conservative MP's don't sit comfortably with this present government and blame Cameron's leadership for moving further and further away from what conservatism stands for. He said its likely the 'blue' parliamentary Brexit supporters just want to contribute to Cameron's and Osbornes downfall and squash this present leadership, because if they wait until the next election, the conservatives won't get in. Installing a new Tory PM would at least give the conservative party a fighting chance.

I say, if politicians within Cameron's own party are prepared to take such desperate measures to repair what's left of the conservative party, then things must be bad. I suspect that what we are seeing here is a modern version of the Roman senators conspiracy with Julius Ceasor.

arista 08-03-2016 10:32 AM

Love Boris on SkyNewsHD
he said the Message telling his staff off
is not longer legal.
He then said its removed from History
as he took his bike into Parliament


What a Guy

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-736x414.jpg


http://news.sky.com/story/1655721/bo...scinded-kaduuk
Video Clip.

[Boris Johnson has said he has "wiped from history"
a 'back Boris on the EU or keep your views
to yourself' edict on City Hall staff.]

smudgie 08-03-2016 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 8553286)
Love Boris on SkyNewsHD
he said the Message telling his staff off
is not longer legal.
He then said its removed from History
as he took his bike into Parliament


What a Guy

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-736x414.jpg


http://news.sky.com/story/1655721/bo...scinded-kaduuk
Video Clip.

[Boris Johnson has said he has "wiped from history"
a 'back Boris on the EU or keep your views
to yourself' edict on City Hall staff.]

What a plonker.

Alf 08-03-2016 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed (Post 8553230)

I know a good few conservatives who are considering the out vote atm. The only thing that's stopping them (the ones I know) is this bandwaggon of petty nationalists and xenophobics that are riding at the front of the 'OUT' chariot.

Why is it xenophobic to fight for the freedom of your country?

I'd say that the people that want to break up these countries and destroy the national identity of people, to form one almighty powerful union are far more xenophobic.

joeysteele 08-03-2016 12:09 PM

Wiped from history maybe only because it came out in the first place.
Against his wishes was this instruction given in the first place or is this statement now only because he was caught out on it.
I know where my suspicions lie.

joeysteele 08-03-2016 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed (Post 8553230)
Cameron will be blamed for bringing this about in the first place. I believe he's damned if we do and damned if we don't. The conservative party are tearing themselves apart and are now so viscerally divided that its become an open and very public warfare. The awkwardness is not going to go away any time soon.

I know a good few conservatives who are considering the out vote atm. The only thing that's stopping them (the ones I know) is this bandwaggon of petty nationalists and xenophobics that are riding at the front of the 'OUT' chariot. I had a very interesting conversation with a conservative friend of mine regarding what he thought about the present party divide and he told me that a lot of conservative MP's don't sit comfortably with this present government and blame Cameron's leadership for moving further and further away from what conservatism stands for. He said its likely the 'blue' parliamentary Brexit supporters just want to contribute to Cameron's and Osbornes downfall and squash this present leadership, because if they wait until the next election, the conservatives won't get in. Installing a new Tory PM would at least give the conservative party a fighting chance.

I say, if politicians within Cameron's own party are prepared to take such desperate measures to repair what's left of the conservative party, then things must be bad. I suspect that what we are seeing here is a modern version of the Roman senators conspiracy with Julius Ceasor.

That is a fascinating post and I do find some of my Conservative friends feeling exactly as you say in the post above.

However at my end most of my Conservative friends feel this has now become the real test for Cameron.
Few believe he can stay on as PM if the vote is to leave but by the same token they think he will be stronger after an 'in' result.

In all honesty however, it will be hard for the Conservatives not to be at the very least the party with the most seats after the 2020 election.
Not because they deserve to be but because of pure and simple arithmetic.

Labour will not turn around the Scottish losses within 5 years only,there will not be any mighty surge to bring about a landslide win for anyone now,I think anyway.
Also,there are boundary changes to come in likely 2018, these will reduce the number of MPs to 600 from 650 and will favour the Conservatives more,in a further 20 seats.

Not the picture I like to think of at all but while I see massive problems for the Conservatives due to this EU issue,they will not be tearing themselves to pieces once an election looms.
So even with the wrangling, the best result for anti Conservatives I can see at this moment in time for 2020,is that they get no overall majority again and then are forced to be far more accountable with totally heartless and unjust policy making thrown out.
Which is why I really believe they will be extra careful now as to who they elect as leader after Cameron with possibly all the leading favourites at present being rejected in the end.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.